Skin wrote:MoMM wrote:So we got Jeff Teague from the Celtics too?
Magic told him not to fly over. They are waiving him.
Nice, at least he will save the flight tickets!
Moderators: Knightro, Howard Mass, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, ChosenSavior, SOUL, UCF
Skin wrote:MoMM wrote:So we got Jeff Teague from the Celtics too?
Magic told him not to fly over. They are waiving him.
Skin wrote:I have Okeke, Hampton, Harris available in my fantasy league. If I can only add one, who should I pick up?
Skin wrote:pepe1991 wrote:Don't pretend that we are now locked to draft Cade or Suggs.
Sitting at 4th worst record gives us 42% chance to end up with 5th or 6th pick.
And there is only 28-30 games to play, T wolves and Detroit is lock for 2 worst records.
Trade grades are wild .From people crying in joy to people crying in anger. Truth is in between.
Magic didn't really get anything major, picks are huge unknown,but odds are, non of them will end up in lottery regardless.
It's a rebuild. Most of the time it's nothing but live- casting for some imaginary future " good roster" . ( not really, almost always once you get star, almost all "assets" are traded ,but it's easier to sell it to fans notion of casting ).
Are you a Magic fan or are you going to transition to the Bulls forum?
We are sitting at 4th worse NOW, but I doubt we win another game the rest of the year. As long as we are just ONE of the bottom 3 teams then we will have an EQUAL CHANCE as any of the other 2 to get the top pick.
Lastly, I'd take Green ahead of Cade and Suggs, but that's my personal preference.
As long as we are just ONE of the bottom 3 teams then we will have an EQUAL CHANCE as any of the other 2 to get the top pick.
pepe1991 wrote:Skin wrote:pepe1991 wrote:Don't pretend that we are now locked to draft Cade or Suggs.
Sitting at 4th worst record gives us 42% chance to end up with 5th or 6th pick.
And there is only 28-30 games to play, T wolves and Detroit is lock for 2 worst records.
Trade grades are wild .From people crying in joy to people crying in anger. Truth is in between.
Magic didn't really get anything major, picks are huge unknown,but odds are, non of them will end up in lottery regardless.
It's a rebuild. Most of the time it's nothing but live- casting for some imaginary future " good roster" . ( not really, almost always once you get star, almost all "assets" are traded ,but it's easier to sell it to fans notion of casting ).
Are you a Magic fan or are you going to transition to the Bulls forum?
We are sitting at 4th worse NOW, but I doubt we win another game the rest of the year. As long as we are just ONE of the bottom 3 teams then we will have an EQUAL CHANCE as any of the other 2 to get the top pick.
Lastly, I'd take Green ahead of Cade and Suggs, but that's my personal preference.
Your question is moronic, as usual. You didn't know basic fact that FG missed under a foul doesn't count in stat sheet, so i can't expect much i guess...
We are sitting at 4th worst, yes. Right now, yes. T wolves lost 34 of 44 games they payed. IT's not like they are now going to win 15 games .
There are only 28 games to play.As long as we are just ONE of the bottom 3 teams then we will have an EQUAL CHANCE as any of the other 2 to get the top pick.
This is why i never take any of your comment serious, and this is execlly why i said almost all your posts are mix of : lies, false informations and simply low quality reads , other than rare, and fare between draft posts ,where you right once every 5 years, but keep remind people about that one time.
Anyway, back to orginal missinformation.
No, top 3 worst records don't have same odds for top pick. Worst record can't fall outside top 5, second worst can't fall outside top 6 ,and 3rd can't fall pass 7. But it's very clear that drafting seventh isn't really rewarding. Issue with 3rd worst record is rather simple one, team that draft with 3rd worst record ( Magic expectet landing spot ) has 47,8% chance to NOT draft in top 4 and 60% to no not draft in top 3.
mattyBoi wrote:If I'm being honest I think this was an awful outcome. We traded 3 starters, one a current all-star, and the 3 best players in the trades and came away with bench guys and protected picks. We absolutely didn't get fair value or come ahead in any trade. I get that it is a reset but damn.
mattyBoi wrote:If I'm being honest I think this was an awful outcome. We traded 3 starters, one a current all-star, and the 3 best players in the trades and came away with bench guys and protected picks. We absolutely didn't get fair value or come ahead in any trade. I get that it is a reset but damn.
Bensational wrote:Wow. I go to bed, wake up expecting to see a simple Gordon trade and there is a Vuc appreciation thread at the top of the board and RGM headlines not mentioning any Magic trades.
I can’t believe they blew it all up completely.
WCJ/Bamba/Birch
Okeke/Aminu/(Isaac)
OPJ/Ennis
Bacon/Ross/(Harris)
MCW/Hampton/(Cole)/(Fultz)
We’re on top position to add a Cade/Suggs/Green/Kuminga/Mobley to that team. A mid-late 1st from the Bulls and one from the C’s.
Really gotta get some new looks out of the 2/3 spot, and hopefully lead playmakers.
Blue_and_Whte wrote:AG is going to be SO good with all that spacing in Denver.
mattyBoi wrote:If I'm being honest I think this was an awful outcome. We traded 3 starters, one a current all-star, and the 3 best players in the trades and came away with bench guys and protected picks. We absolutely didn't get fair value or come ahead in any trade. I get that it is a reset but damn.
Skin wrote:pepe1991 wrote:Skin wrote:Are you a Magic fan or are you going to transition to the Bulls forum?
We are sitting at 4th worse NOW, but I doubt we win another game the rest of the year. As long as we are just ONE of the bottom 3 teams then we will have an EQUAL CHANCE as any of the other 2 to get the top pick.
Lastly, I'd take Green ahead of Cade and Suggs, but that's my personal preference.
Your question is moronic, as usual. You didn't know basic fact that FG missed under a foul doesn't count in stat sheet, so i can't expect much i guess...
We are sitting at 4th worst, yes. Right now, yes. T wolves lost 34 of 44 games they payed. IT's not like they are now going to win 15 games .
There are only 28 games to play.As long as we are just ONE of the bottom 3 teams then we will have an EQUAL CHANCE as any of the other 2 to get the top pick.
This is why i never take any of your comment serious, and this is execlly why i said almost all your posts are mix of : lies, false informations and simply low quality reads , other than rare, and fare between draft posts ,where you right once every 5 years, but keep remind people about that one time.
Anyway, back to orginal missinformation.
No, top 3 worst records don't have same odds for top pick. Worst record can't fall outside top 5, second worst can't fall outside top 6 ,and 3rd can't fall pass 7. But it's very clear that drafting seventh isn't really rewarding. Issue with 3rd worst record is rather simple one, team that draft with 3rd worst record ( Magic expectet landing spot ) has 47,8% chance to NOT draft in top 4 and 60% to no not draft in top 3.
Reading comprehension continues to be your struggle. Not sure if I should continue to respond. You won't get it anyways.
I didn't say anything against the fact that we could still pick outside of the top 3 if we have one of the 3 worst records. I said we would have an equal chance to win the lottery as those other 2 teams in the bottom 3.
Blue_and_Whte wrote:AG is going to be SO good with all that spacing in Denver.
Knightro wrote:The amount of vitriol over the trades is perplexing to me.
If it’s residual sourness over the fact they didn’t do this sooner, then so be it. I can accept that.
But if that isn’t what people are feeling and they’re just mad that they didn’t get perceived fair value... like... this team was absolutely terrible WITH all these guys and now people are upset that the last place team didn’t get enough value back for their last place players?
I don’t get it.
Simply unloading these guys period was the big victory in and of itself.
They unquestionably picked a lane. That’s all I really could have asked for.
jonbob17 wrote:Do you think Bamba gets the next start? Birch? WCJ?