RealGM

I think Bagley can be had on a draft day trade. He needs a change of scenery and so does Mo Bamba.

Do you think 2 2nd round draft picks and Bamba would be enough to sway Sacremento to deal him?

We really do not need to get younger at the power forward position and Bagley could breakout next season.

Thoughts?

J_Magic wrote:I think Bagley can be had on a draft day trade. He needs a change of scenery and so does Mo Bamba.

Do you think 2 2nd round draft picks and Bamba would be enough to sway Sacremento to deal him?

We really do not need to get younger at the power forward position and Bagley could breakout next season.

Thoughts?

I would have thought a straight up Bamba for Bagley is enough

Mo Buckets for Mo Bags?

Even though I was pretty low on Bagley I’d take him. I would love a straight swap with Mo Bamba. Both guys could use a change of scenery.

Not a bad swap honestly

Bagley has underachieved. No doubt. Sacramento will have to sell low on him if they deal hi. But he has put up decent numbers. I think it would cost a lot more than just Bamba. That would be a steal if we could do it. I think we would at least have to give up the future Chicago pick, but even then I would do it.

Bagley vs Barnes vs Okeke vs Isaac pre-draft comparison:
http://www.tankathon.com/players/compare?players=marcus-bagley--jonathan-kuminga

Barnes is a knuckle-dragger.
Bagely with the crazy good stats (but short arms).

Im ashamed to say i was the co captain of the Balgey-Luka ship. I had them at 1A and 1B with Trae probably #6. lol

Probably my Duke-colored glasses. And my fetish for the double-jump ability.

So yeah.. im all for this. Throw in the 33 with Bamba of that what it takes.

I wouldn't mind Bagley has potential, may just a change of scenery.

Rainwater wrote:I wouldn't mind Bagley has potential, may just a change of scenery.

If I'm not mistaken he needs to find his durability

TDJacksonville wrote:

Rainwater wrote:I wouldn't mind Bagley has potential, may just a change of scenery.

If I'm not mistaken he needs to find his durability

This is straight facts, I think that may be his biggest issue.

No thanks. I'd rather have Bamba and I am far from optimistic about Mo. Bagley stinks and has attitude problems.

Bagley has no feel and isn’t good at anything that provides value. I’d rather keep Bamba.

Xatticus wrote:Bagley has no feel and isn’t good at anything that provides value. I’d rather keep Bamba.

He is a superstar role player kind of player if you get what I mean. He has no scoring niche but he scores in a variety of ways. Watching him from the ncaa I would have thought he would someday lead the league in rebounds.

Thats his value which I think is more useful than Mo.

I'd rather see if Mo can put anything together with a coach that doesn't irrationally hate him first.

Orlando is not exchanging deck-chairs. Bamba will either get better or not be resigned. For me the only way I see Bamba being shipped off is in a trade-up move. That would not involve Bagley.

Bagley has more upside and is more talented IMO. The problem with him is with his mentality and those surrounding him. He seems like he's unwilling to humble himself. And a team like this with a who bunch of young players with little to no vet leadership I can't see how he'd be able to change his attitude to push him in a direction for success.

Tarheel wrote:I'd rather see if Mo can put anything together with a coach that doesn't irrationally hate him first.

Being an insanely lazy player/person would drive most people mad. I've worked with countless people like him. I would not call it "irrational hatred" at all. He's earned that himself.

Tarheel wrote:I'd rather see if Mo can put anything together with a coach that doesn't irrationally hate him first.

What?! Cliff wasn’t irrational. Bamba played like a damn bum and it’s mostly his own fault. We can only pray that he decides not to be a lazy ass and takes advantage of a healthy offseason and gets better, although outside of looking in a mirror I don’t know how one improves approach to the game

Bamba + MCW + 2(33) for Bagley + Metu.

Metu added because we need another C, unless we draft one at 33 and in that case just Bamba + MCW for Bagley.