I spent last couple of days during free time thinking why Magic fans ( not just here ,but on pretty much any place on internet ) don't really like Cole all that much and are way more objective about him, but in same time blow Fultz out of proportion on daily bases.
Even at first sight, it's not very hard to notice that Cole is way better player, way more productive, way less harmful to a team and on top of that, younger.
But fans prefer Fultz? Why.
My only logical conclusions were:
1) fans still have some illlogical hope that "Washington Fultz" exists somwhere. This is just bizzare to me, since his college season happened half of a decade ago, and even before that season, scouts weren't sold on his outside jumpshot. And everything that happened after he went 1# pick made it that much more impossible for him to translate into elite shooter in nba. ( even average for that matter ).
What makes "Washington Fultz" any closer to reality than "Duke Jah Okafor" or "Duke Bagley" ? Nothing really. it's combination of desparation from fans for star and being irrational about notion that some players never live up to draft stock.
1) Connecting Fultz season with times when team was betterI went back and forth with this one. But than i tuned in reddit and saw like 80 posts how amazing Fultz was at running a team. Again, it was complete fabrication of reality, but it's not any different than hope "DC Fultz" is.
Even during that season, Magic fans refused to admit there is basically no difference between DJ running offense vs him. Fans were claiming he can "get anywhere on the floor" and "shoot mid range like Chris Paul".
And indeed, Fultz had very nice mid range shooting season. But if you look back, Magic had 42-40 record with DJ Augustin ( and less injuries all around, as some objective outside factor) than they had with Fultz "running point".
They also,by default, tune brain cells out on 7 games sample size before ACL tear where every single aspect of his game reverted back to 76ers- meme Fultz- self.
Overall Fultz wasn't all that important for Magic season. He didn't do much harm, but also didn't really lifted team as it was claimed. Ranking Magic most important players ,he was behind Vuc, Isaac, Gordon, Ross,Evan.
Cole has his portion of downside. He is miniature, lack size, has no clue how to position himself on defense, his awarness is shameful at times. He is trigger happy and at times freezes own teammates with tunnel vision.
But Cole isn't any worst at running offense than Fultz. Cole is much better shooter. But much worst finisher around rim ( can he stop attemping dunks ? )
Overall, any objective Magic grading guards would rank Cole as better player and prospect than Fultz.
Now, it depends to Suggs how he will hold up, but he is very young and only played 20 games. So he could end up being better than both. And hopefully he will. But Fultz being treated as some De'aaron Fox type of player who will "save" franchise and Cole as trade asset and "bench player" really blows my mind. Cole might be in future Clarkson / Sexton type player. That doesn't change fact that Fultz NBA career has been, to this point super overhyped Ramon Sessions.
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon