Magic Exercise Team Options on Franz Wagner, Jalen Suggs and Paolo Banchero

Post #1 » by **Knightro** » Wed Oct 4, 2023 2:34 pm

Read on Twitter

As expected.

Post #2 » by **eyriq** » Wed Oct 4, 2023 3:51 pm

Pretty much proof that Black is going to be in the rotation

fendilim · Post #3 » by **fendilim** » Wed Oct 4, 2023 4:12 pm

Any news on Houstan? Or his will be before free agency next yr?

ORLMagicGirl15 · Post #4 » by **ORLMagicGirl15** » Wed Oct 4, 2023 4:13 pm

Did we decline’s Houstan’s? Honestly, he is a huge bet and a great asset to have. I really like Houstan.

orlando_joe · Post #5 » by **orlando_joe** » Wed Oct 4, 2023 4:22 pm

ORLMagicGirl15 wrote:Did we decline’s Houstan’s? Honestly, he is a huge bet and a great asset to have. I really like Houstan.

he is already guaranteed for next season he had 3 of 4 yrs in contract

fendilim · Post #6 » by **fendilim** » Wed Oct 4, 2023 5:00 pm

orlando_joe wrote:
ORLMagicGirl15 wrote:Did we decline’s Houstan’s? Honestly, he is a huge bet and a great asset to have. I really like Houstan.

he is already guaranteed for next season he had 3 of 4 yrs in contract

Year 3 is no guaranteed
Year 4 is team option

I havent seen the deadline on those though

The-Stallion70 · Post #7 » by **The-Stallion70** » Wed Oct 4, 2023 5:08 pm

Shocker

orlando_joe · Post #8 » by **orlando_joe** » Wed Oct 4, 2023 11:03 pm

fendilim wrote:
orlando_joe wrote:
ORLMagicGirl15 wrote:Did we decline’s Houstan’s? Honestly, he is a huge bet and a great asset to have. I really like Houstan.

he is already guaranteed for next season he had 3 of 4 yrs in contract

Year 3 is no guaranteed
Year 4 is team option

I havent seen the deadline on those though

i saw it its june 30th 2024

purpleswordfish · Post #9 » by **purpleswordfish** » Wed Oct 4, 2023 11:09 pm

The Magic should have declined the option on Suggs. He's available about half the time and when he is on the court he's relatively inefficient. It's just another guy who will be paid to rehab.

Ducklett · Post #10 » by **Ducklett** » Thu Oct 5, 2023 12:11 am

purpleswordfish wrote:The Magic should have declined the option on Suggs. He's available about half the time and when he is on the court he's relatively inefficient. It's just another guy who will be paid to rehab.

That is quite a take.

Post #11 » by **Knightro** » Thu Oct 5, 2023 12:19 am

purpleswordfish wrote:The Magic should have declined the option on Suggs. He's available about half the time and when he is on the court he's relatively inefficient. It's just another guy who will be paid to rehab.

Watch on YouTube

Skin · Post #12 » by **Skin** » Thu Oct 5, 2023 1:22 am

eyriq wrote:Pretty much proof that Black is going to be in the rotation

Yeah, something about the thought of a Black, Suggs, Wagner, Banchero, Carter starting 5 just screeeeams, "Come match our shooting Golden St!" :lol:

Post #13 » by **SOUL** » Thu Oct 5, 2023 1:25 am

Knightro wrote:
purpleswordfish wrote:The Magic should have declined the option on Suggs. He's available about half the time and when he is on the court he's relatively inefficient. It's just another guy who will be paid to rehab.

Watch on YouTube

Honestly I'd debate even declining Banchero because he's going to leave for Seattle anyway so why not let him go where he wants earlier :wink:

purpleswordfish · Post #14 » by **purpleswordfish** » Thu Oct 5, 2023 2:05 am

Knightro wrote:
purpleswordfish wrote:The Magic should have declined the option on Suggs. He's available about half the time and when he is on the court he's relatively inefficient. It's just another guy who will be paid to rehab.

Watch on YouTube

It really isn't bait. I'm not looking to incite an argument. I just don't think he's done anything to have the Magic not make him prove himself this year.

Post #15 » by **Bensational** » Thu Oct 5, 2023 5:42 am

Excellent! Now we just need to extend Fultz and Cole and we’re set.

(now that’s bait!

)

drsd · Post #16 » by **drsd** » Thu Oct 5, 2023 7:37 am

Bensational wrote:Excellent! Now we just need to extend Fultz and Cole and we’re set.

(now that’s bait! )

For perspective, this is what 43M looks like, which is what the combined cost of these two will be annually.

pepe1991 · Post #17 » by **pepe1991** » Thu Oct 5, 2023 8:21 am

drsd wrote:
Bensational wrote:Excellent! Now we just need to extend Fultz and Cole and we’re set.

(now that’s bait! )

For perspective, this is what 43M looks like, which is what the combined cost of these two will be annually.

in context of a team, it would look more like this

Skybox · Post #18 » by **Skybox** » Thu Oct 5, 2023 11:58 am

pepe1991 wrote:
drsd wrote:
Bensational wrote:Excellent! Now we just need to extend Fultz and Cole and we’re set.

(now that’s bait! )

For perspective, this is what 43M looks like, which is what the combined cost of these two will be annually.

in context of a team, it would look more like this

Wow...and-1 wouldn't be enough :lol:

Post #19 » by **ChosenSavior** » Thu Oct 5, 2023 12:25 pm

pepe1991 wrote:
drsd wrote:
Bensational wrote:Excellent! Now we just need to extend Fultz and Cole and we’re set.

(now that’s bait! )

For perspective, this is what 43M looks like, which is what the combined cost of these two will be annually.

in context of a team, it would look more like this

Kudos on the response here :lol:

Post #20 » by **Knightro** » Thu Oct 5, 2023 12:42 pm

Bensational wrote:Excellent! Now we just need to extend Fultz and Cole and we’re set.

(now that’s bait! )