Bensational wrote:lol. nothing's a simple matter of logic with you. it's a simple matter of skewed statistics to back up your point. i don't even know who you were referring to with the whole "a player who's played over 250 games" comment, and you well know that. that was an open ended sentence that had a whole lot of holes in it, as i pointed out.
The hole is in your thought process. Obviously it was an example without reference to a particular player and its right there in the post in plain English. I don't need to specify a particularly player when I was using a hypothetical example referring to players in general. further more you prove you understand it completely by applying the example to a player I didn't specify -
by your reasoning, you don't expect Dwight to develop AT ALL, because he's played over 250 games before turning 23 and all the rational people have "seen what his game is". lol. yet David West could become the next Moses Malone because he hasn't fulfilled his 250 game quota.
So you knew I was using it generally of players because you understood it enough to apply my example to your specific.
However Sorry please reference what a strawman argument is because you just made one. No one said a player could not get better AT ALL. Thats your invention. What Rich said and logic concurs is that playing time not just age OBVIOUSLY is a factor when determining the chances of a player getting better. The more you see of a player the more likely you are to know what his skill set is and the more likely you are to accurately forecast his possibilities for improvement. Continue to argue against common sense.
seriously, i don't get what you were referring to with that. games started don't reflect player ability.
Oh brother. Starting doesn't reflect playing ability? and starting doesn't indicate increased and regular playing time? and regular playing time doesn't give you a better indication of what a player's skill sets are? and knowing those things doesn't give you a better picture of future ability?
Dwight will improve more in areas where he has shown improvement We saw in preseason and toward the early part of the season some additional offensive moves he's working on. He'll get better at footwork and learning the game more. So of course you are talking pure nonsense about me not expecting him to improve at all. But do I expect Dwight to become a prolific three point shooter? of course not. We've seen enough of his skillset to know that three point shooting is not going to be his thing. He's not likely to be a dirk like player from the arc. Is this really that hard to understand?