Page 1 of 2

Marbury?

Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 8:57 am
by AgEnT50
Marbury A Chance To Be Bought Out?

Jun 29, 2008 4:15 AM EST

According to the report, if president Donnie Walsh acquires a point guard, Marbury likely will be released, according to a league source.

David Lee, who is looking for a contract extension, seems the most likely candidate to be dealt for a point guard, with Raymond Felton from Charlotte and the Steve Blake from Portland possible options.



If he's bought out. . .do you think there's a chance that we may look into acquiring him? What do you think?
Personally i'm kind of "iffy" about it. . .he's a good talent, but I question his character and attitude at times.

Ideas. . .?¿

Re: Marbury?

Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 9:02 am
by MagicMadness
Not interested. Hopefully, the Magic aren't either.

Re: Marbury?

Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 9:46 am
by FFBlitzace
I'd be interested. We're talking about a guy who can average 3 or 4 dimes and 5 or 6 assists per game here. And when he shoots to win, he shoots to win.

Re: Marbury?

Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 9:53 am
by MagicStarwipe
If he could be had for cheap, I'd take him.

Re: Marbury?

Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 10:07 am
by SOUL
Arroyo for Marbury ;)

Re: Marbury?

Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 10:50 am
by drsd
Soul wrote:Arroyo for Marbury ;)



More realistic, Arroyo could sign with New York. He would sell tickets in NYC, and fits their style of play.

As for a trade Redick for Lee works straight up.

Re: Marbury?

Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 4:17 pm
by trebone
arroyo wont work in a trade if bought out but I would do it he would be good off the bench, I feel we have enough character guys to take care of his attitude if not dwight can body slam him a few times to let him know whos boss

Re: Marbury?

Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 4:23 pm
by CourtsideTV
I wouldnt take marbury if he paid us to play.

He just isn't a winner.

Re: Marbury?

Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 4:59 pm
by theTHIEF
Marbs at the vet min if we're still looking for that 3rd PG, absolutely...this guy knows how to get to the basket, he can control a game from the FT stripe unlike many PG's in the game, he's fairly good size and he's not a bad distributor...maybe hes one of those change of scenery guys...idk...even though he's a "big shot" I think his talent outweighs his downside...he would never come here though, too many negatives on the track record...

Re: Marbury?

Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 5:31 pm
by j-ragg
drsd wrote:
Soul wrote:Arroyo for Marbury ;)



More realistic, Arroyo could sign with New York. He would sell tickets in NYC, and fits their style of play.

As for a trade Redick for Lee works straight up.


A guy who only gets garbage minutes vs a guy who has averaged a double double off the bench?

Sign me up!

Re: Marbury?

Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 5:34 pm
by Orange Ave.
Oh my no.

Cancer. And I suspect his ego wouldn't allow him to sit quietly as a 3rd stringer. I'd rather have Hedo be the 3rd string PG than bring in this sour-puss.


It's taken me years to get over seeing Vernon Maxwell in a Magic uni as is.

Re: Marbury?

Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 5:45 pm
by G-Heel
Please say no to Starbury. EVERYWHERE he went, he made his teams worse than before. I'm 100% sure after he leave NY, they'll fare better than before.

Re: Marbury?

Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 5:47 pm
by Cigamodnalro
Yeah, I don't want Faloop on my team.

Re: Marbury?

Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 6:13 pm
by Knicksfan20
drsd wrote:
Soul wrote:Arroyo for Marbury ;)



More realistic, Arroyo could sign with New York. He would sell tickets in NYC, and fits their style of play.

As for a trade Redick for Lee works straight up.





Um....ya...WTF are you smoking?

Re: Marbury?

Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 6:28 pm
by CourtsideTV
Cigamodnalro wrote:Yeah, I don't want Faloop on my team.


what the heck does faloop mean?

I can't believe you guys are accepting a guy who has a huge ego to be part of this team. The only time marbs was ever good was his rookie year with KG..then his head got big...or maybe it was before but he never expressed it publicly.

I'd take a mature francis over an egotistical starbury

Re: Marbury?

Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 6:35 pm
by Magic.City.23.
Arroyo + JJ 4 Lee + bum

Re: Marbury?

Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 6:39 pm
by Knicksfan20
Magic.City.23. wrote:Arroyo + JJ 4 Lee + bum


Lol...still no


Only way we take back **** from u guys, is if u take randolph



check the Randolph thread, somthing like that i would do...not trade Lee for scrubs

Re: Marbury?

Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 6:44 pm
by aleZ
NYKnicksfan11 wrote:Only way we take back **** from u guys, is if u take randolph


Actually we may need Randolph more than Marbs if and when he wants to play defense/get boards and not be a (fringe, mostly wannabe) star anymore.

As for Loserbury, how you guys call him some days, we already tried that with SteveFrancis and although fun, that season threw us into the lottery headfirst.

Re: Marbury?

Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 10:05 pm
by EasternMagic
I'm iffy on him.. don't really like him but if his attitude was straight he could really help, if he could be purchased for a cheap price and he pulled his stuff together id take a chance on him.. I'd rather go after Livingston though.

Re: Marbury?

Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 10:26 pm
by spinedoc
He's a bad fit, and I doubt he would sign somewhere for the minimum. We should have other targets in mind imo.