ImageImageImage

Worst Player Acquisition of the Process/Embiid Era

Moderators: BullyKing, HartfordWhalers, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan

Who Was Worst Player Acquisition of the Embiid/Process Era

Jahlil Okafor
7
14%
Ben Simmons
2
4%
Markelle Fultz
15
31%
Zhaire Smith
5
10%
Tobias Harris
11
22%
Al Horford
6
12%
James Harden
0
No votes
Paul George
2
4%
Other
1
2%
 
Total votes: 49

agiaco
Analyst
Posts: 3,709
And1: 1,144
Joined: Jun 26, 2009

Re: Worst Player Acquisition of the Process/Embiid Era 

Post#21 » by agiaco » Wed Jun 4, 2025 12:36 am

Fultz
FlyingArrow
Starter
Posts: 2,471
And1: 1,568
Joined: May 29, 2018
   

Re: Worst Player Acquisition of the Process/Embiid Era 

Post#22 » by FlyingArrow » Wed Jun 4, 2025 2:56 am

I went with Zhaire Smith based on a combination of worst process and worst opportunity cost.

In terms of process... he had a short power forward skillset. He never had a profile to warrant being drafted that high.

In terms of opportunity cost... we easily could have had either Mikal Bridges or Shai instead.

For all the others, there was a reasonable expectation that it could have worked out. If Ben or Markelle had even played like a top-15 draft pick. Not even a #1 overall. If Tobias had remained a borderline all-star. Horford has proven that he wasn't washed up. I think we just never figured out how to mesh him with Embiid. PG may yet be a borderline all-star for us. Harden worked out pretty well for a while. And while Jahlil Okafor didn't work out, none of the next 7 draft picks did, either. Several later in the draft did, but it wasn't like we "almost" had somebody better. We would've had to buck conventional wisdom by a lot (or trade down) to get a winner in that draft.

He wasn't the worst outcome. That's either Ben or Markelle. But there are multiple ways to answer this question. It's been bad in lots of different ways.
User avatar
mjkvol
Head Coach
Posts: 6,579
And1: 6,250
Joined: Apr 13, 2019

Re: Worst Player Acquisition of the Process/Embiid Era 

Post#23 » by mjkvol » Wed Jun 4, 2025 1:04 pm

FlyingArrow wrote:I went with Zhaire Smith based on a combination of worst process and worst opportunity cost.

In terms of process... he had a short power forward skillset. He never had a profile to warrant being drafted that high.

In terms of opportunity cost... we easily could have had either Mikal Bridges or Shai instead.

For all the others, there was a reasonable expectation that it could have worked out. If Ben or Markelle had even played like a top-15 draft pick. Not even a #1 overall. If Tobias had remained a borderline all-star. Horford has proven that he wasn't washed up. I think we just never figured out how to mesh him with Embiid. PG may yet be a borderline all-star for us. Harden worked out pretty well for a while. And while Jahlil Okafor didn't work out, none of the next 7 draft picks did, either. Several later in the draft did, but it wasn't like we "almost" had somebody better. We would've had to buck conventional wisdom by a lot (or trade down) to get a winner in that draft.

He wasn't the worst outcome. That's either Ben or Markelle. But there are multiple ways to answer this question. It's been bad in lots of different ways.


Good points, but I disagree on Tobias, who was never really a borderline all-star other than in the national media's eyes. Trading for him was a bad idea, and extending him a hideous one, because it involved letting Butler walk. If he was actually a borderline all-star, someone would have made a trade offer for him at some point.

Okafor was a dreadful pick, but the possibility is that Hinkie had nowhere else to go in that draft and that the plan was always to pump-and-dump him, which would have worked like a charm if Silver hadn't intervened.
"Most people do not really want freedom, because freedom involves responsibility, and most people are frightened of responsibility." - Sigmund Freud
User avatar
Stanford
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 53,346
And1: 18,451
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Location: Parts Unknown
   

Re: Worst Player Acquisition of the Process/Embiid Era 

Post#24 » by Stanford » Wed Jun 4, 2025 1:37 pm

I'm pretty sure they would have traded for Tobias even without the Miami pick. They would have just thrown in something else.
FlyingArrow
Starter
Posts: 2,471
And1: 1,568
Joined: May 29, 2018
   

Re: Worst Player Acquisition of the Process/Embiid Era 

Post#25 » by FlyingArrow » Wed Jun 4, 2025 9:47 pm

mjkvol wrote:Good points, but I disagree on Tobias, who was never really a borderline all-star other than in the national media's eyes. Trading for him was a bad idea, and extending him a hideous one, because it involved letting Butler walk. If he was actually a borderline all-star, someone would have made a trade offer for him at some point.

Okafor was a dreadful pick, but the possibility is that Hinkie had nowhere else to go in that draft and that the plan was always to pump-and-dump him, which would have worked like a charm if Silver hadn't intervened.


For 4 years, Tobias was a 19ppg scorer with 39% on threes, and was always 80%+ at the line. If one year was a slight up year and one year a down year (same averages) he would've had an All-Star season in there. Regardless, he never did make an All-Star team.

I was in favor of signing Tobias with that huge contract (or whatever it took to keep him - we were bidding against ourselves, I think so we probably could have signed him for less). But I meant to do it if we had also kept Jimmy and JJ. We had a great 2019 team but fell short. Running it back was the best move basketball-wise, but they wouldn't (or couldn't) do it. If we kept everyone, then we wouldn't have cap room to go out and find other players. It would have been expensive, but we had the rights to do it. Jimmy + Tobias + JJ >>> Al Horford + Tobias.

Spending the money on Al Horford instead of Jimmy and JJ was a bad move to begin with. That was a worse move in retrospect, and I thought it was bad at the time.

Paying Tobias all that money was also a bad move. They actually should have paid him (imo), but only if they were going to go over the cap signing Butler and JJ, leaving them no way to sign any other player as good as Tobias. Since they stayed under the cap to sign Al Horford, they could have stayed WAY under the cap by not signing Tobias. In that case, there would have been much better uses for that money.
User avatar
mjkvol
Head Coach
Posts: 6,579
And1: 6,250
Joined: Apr 13, 2019

Re: Worst Player Acquisition of the Process/Embiid Era 

Post#26 » by mjkvol » Thu Jun 5, 2025 2:14 am

FlyingArrow wrote:
mjkvol wrote:Good points, but I disagree on Tobias, who was never really a borderline all-star other than in the national media's eyes. Trading for him was a bad idea, and extending him a hideous one, because it involved letting Butler walk. If he was actually a borderline all-star, someone would have made a trade offer for him at some point.

Okafor was a dreadful pick, but the possibility is that Hinkie had nowhere else to go in that draft and that the plan was always to pump-and-dump him, which would have worked like a charm if Silver hadn't intervened.


For 4 years, Tobias was a 19ppg scorer with 39% on threes, and was always 80%+ at the line. If one year was a slight up year and one year a down year (same averages) he would've had an All-Star season in there. Regardless, he never did make an All-Star team.

I was in favor of signing Tobias with that huge contract (or whatever it took to keep him - we were bidding against ourselves, I think so we probably could have signed him for less). But I meant to do it if we had also kept Jimmy and JJ. We had a great 2019 team but fell short. Running it back was the best move basketball-wise, but they wouldn't (or couldn't) do it. If we kept everyone, then we wouldn't have cap room to go out and find other players. It would have been expensive, but we had the rights to do it. Jimmy + Tobias + JJ >>> Al Horford + Tobias.

Spending the money on Al Horford instead of Jimmy and JJ was a bad move to begin with. That was a worse move in retrospect, and I thought it was bad at the time.

Paying Tobias all that money was also a bad move. They actually should have paid him (imo), but only if they were going to go over the cap signing Butler and JJ, leaving them no way to sign any other player as good as Tobias. Since they stayed under the cap to sign Al Horford, they could have stayed WAY under the cap by not signing Tobias. In that case, there would have been much better uses for that money.


We're just going to disagree completely on Tobias, who to me was the living definition of an empty stats tank commander type. You look at his stats without seeing him play and he appears to be a contributor, but you watch the games and this is a guy who never met a big spot where he wouldn't disappear. He didn't take a single charge in five years here, which is still one of the most remarkable things I've ever heard about a player.

The trade made no sense at the time, and the signing made even less sense. His presence mucked up the cap situation for five years, and he was impossible to move, which is kind of odd for a "borderline all-star", isn't it? The media treated him like a star because of his salary, but the league knew he was an albatross and a losing player.
"Most people do not really want freedom, because freedom involves responsibility, and most people are frightened of responsibility." - Sigmund Freud
M2J
Analyst
Posts: 3,420
And1: 1,699
Joined: Sep 04, 2012

Re: Worst Player Acquisition of the Process/Embiid Era 

Post#27 » by M2J » Thu Jun 5, 2025 6:06 am

mjkvol wrote:
FlyingArrow wrote:
mjkvol wrote:Good points, but I disagree on Tobias, who was never really a borderline all-star other than in the national media's eyes. Trading for him was a bad idea, and extending him a hideous one, because it involved letting Butler walk. If he was actually a borderline all-star, someone would have made a trade offer for him at some point.

Okafor was a dreadful pick, but the possibility is that Hinkie had nowhere else to go in that draft and that the plan was always to pump-and-dump him, which would have worked like a charm if Silver hadn't intervened.


For 4 years, Tobias was a 19ppg scorer with 39% on threes, and was always 80%+ at the line. If one year was a slight up year and one year a down year (same averages) he would've had an All-Star season in there. Regardless, he never did make an All-Star team.

I was in favor of signing Tobias with that huge contract (or whatever it took to keep him - we were bidding against ourselves, I think so we probably could have signed him for less). But I meant to do it if we had also kept Jimmy and JJ. We had a great 2019 team but fell short. Running it back was the best move basketball-wise, but they wouldn't (or couldn't) do it. If we kept everyone, then we wouldn't have cap room to go out and find other players. It would have been expensive, but we had the rights to do it. Jimmy + Tobias + JJ >>> Al Horford + Tobias.

Spending the money on Al Horford instead of Jimmy and JJ was a bad move to begin with. That was a worse move in retrospect, and I thought it was bad at the time.

Paying Tobias all that money was also a bad move. They actually should have paid him (imo), but only if they were going to go over the cap signing Butler and JJ, leaving them no way to sign any other player as good as Tobias. Since they stayed under the cap to sign Al Horford, they could have stayed WAY under the cap by not signing Tobias. In that case, there would have been much better uses for that money.


We're just going to disagree completely on Tobias, who to me was the living definition of an empty stats tank commander type. You look at his stats without seeing him play and he appears to be a contributor, but you watch the games and this is a guy who never met a big spot where he wouldn't disappear. He didn't take a single charge in five years here, which is still one of the most remarkable things I've ever heard about a player.

The trade made no sense at the time, and the signing made even less sense. His presence mucked up the cap situation for five years, and he was impossible to move, which is kind of odd for a "borderline all-star", isn't it? The media treated him like a star because of his salary, but the league knew he was an albatross and a losing player.



I'm confused myself, because I chose fultz... But Fultz turned into Maxey.

I still struggle to say Tobias though, because he was always supposed to be a number 3 guy for this team and the team tried to max out success before they have ben Simmons his extension and they couldn't get over the cap with talent. Clearly they should've chosen Jimmy over Tobias, but just like I'm complaining about in the draft thread... Organization choose pliability over the talent in Jimmy. Meaning they chose the guy willing to try and be the 3 and D guy over Jimmy who refused to shoot, but was clearly more talented.... Was willing to bump heads too and was older.

At the end of the day because of the timing regarding the need to use the money. It does seem as if Tobias was a better fit game and age wise. Also, Even if Tobias didn't cower and he did cower... Joel was never healthy in the 2nd round and when it comes to the Sixers overall results it starts and stops with Joel.

Still feels like if Fultz worked out, it puts less pressure on even the Tobias move or even the need to make it. Better to say if Tatum was on the roster instead
Winejk
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,500
And1: 435
Joined: Jun 28, 2010

Re: Worst Player Acquisition of the Process/Embiid Era 

Post#28 » by Winejk » Fri Jun 6, 2025 7:09 pm

Ok I'll go with Zaire Smith because if the Sixers didn't trade for him, they probably would have kept Mikal Bridges. And Bridges is the type of player the team could have used during Embiid's prime. And if the Sixers had kept Bridges, the trade for Tobias Harris probably doesn't take place.
User avatar
Stanford
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 53,346
And1: 18,451
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Location: Parts Unknown
   

Re: Worst Player Acquisition of the Process/Embiid Era 

Post#29 » by Stanford » Fri Jun 6, 2025 7:26 pm

Winejk wrote:And if the Sixers had kept Bridges, the trade for Tobias Harris probably doesn't take place.


You kidding? Bridges would have been IN the Tobias trade!
SixersSince82
Junior
Posts: 361
And1: 286
Joined: Sep 11, 2020
   

Re: Worst Player Acquisition of the Process/Embiid Era 

Post#30 » by SixersSince82 » Fri Jun 6, 2025 10:36 pm

Boy there were a lot of missteps. But the correct answer is Tobias Harris. He cost us the most in terms of assets. He cost us the most in terms of finances. He sunk Joel's prime.

Ben and Fultz worked out poorly after the fact. Overpaying for Tobias Harris was dumb at the time and they still did it. Twice! Once via trade, once via Free Agency.
Murray_17
RealGM
Posts: 13,588
And1: 13,399
Joined: Mar 20, 2020
   

Re: Worst Player Acquisition of the Process/Embiid Era 

Post#31 » by Murray_17 » Sat Jun 7, 2025 12:32 am

Winejk wrote:Ok I'll go with Zaire Smith because if the Sixers didn't trade for him, they probably would have kept Mikal Bridges. And Bridges is the type of player the team could have used during Embiid's prime. And if the Sixers had kept Bridges, the trade for Tobias Harris probably doesn't take place.



The Sixers didn't make that trade because they wanted Zaire, they made the trade to get the unprotected pick from Miami. If you look at that pick when the trade was made, it had unbelievable value, i'll never judge that trade harshly because the pick was worthed at the moment and Bridges ended up being better than what anyone projected.

The front office was loading itself on picks to get a "game changer" and then used those picks on Tobias. As said above, Bridges would have been included on the Tobias trade without that pick. Team was high on Shamet at the time and they included him in the trade anyways.
LeonJordanJr24
Starter
Posts: 2,194
And1: 707
Joined: Jul 18, 2013

Re: Worst Player Acquisition of the Process/Embiid Era 

Post#32 » by LeonJordanJr24 » Sat Jun 7, 2025 3:56 pm

Hmm if we lose Yabu I'm all for a Simmons reunion. Can play 1/3/4/5 defense,reb and assists and will be cheaper and younger than Yabu in free agency.
the_process
RealGM
Posts: 28,698
And1: 10,060
Joined: May 01, 2010

Re: Worst Player Acquisition of the Process/Embiid Era 

Post#33 » by the_process » Thu Jun 12, 2025 10:49 pm

Just checking to remind everyone that even though Fultz was a gigantic bust... the answer to the question at hand is still overwhelmingly Tobias.
Eyeamok
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,922
And1: 3,796
Joined: Mar 02, 2006
 

Re: Worst Player Acquisition of the Process/Embiid Era 

Post#34 » by Eyeamok » Fri Jun 13, 2025 5:58 pm

LeonJordanJr24 wrote:Hmm if we lose Yabu I'm all for a Simmons reunion. Can play 1/3/4/5 defense,reb and assists and will be cheaper and younger than Yabu in free agency.


BS: He is a part time player now and you will always be playing 4 vs 5 on offense. Thank you but no thank you, we have already done that dance. Klutch does not want him, the Nets don't want him, he has never met a shot he liked yet he is always working on his game. Absolutely not.

Initially I said Fultz, but we managed to turn Fultz into Maxey, so i'm good with that. I still recall how TJ was basically reduced to babysitting Fultz and teaching him how to be a basketball player so Fultz could take TJ's backup position and eventually be a starter. Crazy how that has worked out.

After reading all the Harris recaps I have to agree, Harris was the worse. And I liked him as a person. But as a max player he just never ever delivered when it mattered the most. Just bad all the way around.
You want it to be one way....but it's the other way.

Marlo
User avatar
mjkvol
Head Coach
Posts: 6,579
And1: 6,250
Joined: Apr 13, 2019

Re: Worst Player Acquisition of the Process/Embiid Era 

Post#35 » by mjkvol » Fri Jun 13, 2025 10:06 pm

I voted Okafor because aside from being an atrocious pick, he was the the central figure in the move that led to Hinkie's dismissal when he had worked out the trade with Ainge that d-bag Silver nixed.

But all things considered, it's Tobias. An awful trade followed by a hideous signing, and 5 1/2 years of mediocre play and disappearing acts that seemed like a couple of decades. The fact that his untradable presence prevented us from making the necessary roster changes to maximize Embiid's prime only adds to the utter disaster that Brand created.
"Most people do not really want freedom, because freedom involves responsibility, and most people are frightened of responsibility." - Sigmund Freud

Return to Philadelphia 76ers