Can Antawn Jamison be our #4 next year

UptownPhilly · Post #21 » by **UptownPhilly** » Wed Jan 9, 2008 4:17 am

wow444 wrote:I'd add Brandon Bass to the young ones list. He is stuck behind Nowitzki in Dallas and is a big body with a low post game and a decent jumper. To me the guy who makes the most sense, both in quality and acquirability is Shelden Williams. To me he has the potential to be Brand light. Don't let the forehead cloud your judgement.

I'm not too high on Shelden Williams, but I would love to have a one-on-one with Candace Parker, if you know what I mean. :lol:

sec-106 · Post #22 » by **sec-106** » Wed Jan 9, 2008 7:36 pm

If the $$$ and length of contract are equal, who would you rather have:

Jamison or Randolph?

UptownPhilly · Post #23 » by **UptownPhilly** » Wed Jan 9, 2008 9:05 pm

sec-106 wrote:If the $$$ and length of contract are equal, who would you rather have:

Jamison or Randolph?

Jamison. Randolph's stats look good on paper, but he destroys team chemistry.

Randolph would be my choice if he weren't such a selfish player, but we would go backwards with him.

Ganon19 · Post #24 » by **Ganon19** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 2:35 pm

Roletagg wrote:He'd be worth the risk if he's available after we already grab our Stoudemire, Brand, Gasol type PF.

If we could sign him for less than $10 Million why not. He'd be a very solid six man. We really have no chance of getting him though.

It's good to dream...

He would be coming off the bench on this team?

L.O.L.

Post #25 » by **The Guilty Party** » Sat Mar 15, 2008 10:21 pm

I've given this some more thought and I think I would all for going after Jamison if we drafted Anthony Randolph or if we somehow traded for either Tyrus Thomas or Brandan Wright.

I would only offer Jamison a 3 year deal and have him here as a starter for the first year or two while the teams grooms the young PF and then use Jamison's expiring contract as trade bait in year three.

Post #26 » by **dbodner** » Sun Mar 16, 2008 12:23 am

With our recent winning ways, I might re-evaluate Jamison. It depends who's available, though.

freshie2 · Post #27 » by **freshie2** » Sun Mar 16, 2008 12:32 am

I don't think Jamison leaves Washington...

queridiculo · Post #28 » by **queridiculo** » Sun Mar 16, 2008 1:56 am

Jamison has absolutely no incentive to leave Washington. He's on a perennial playoff team that can challenge for the East crown when the team is healthy. He likes the coach, loves the area and loves his teammates.

Sounds like a pipedream to me.

Cru Thik · Post #29 » by **Cru Thik** » Sun Mar 16, 2008 2:24 am

hermitkid wrote:Jamison has absolutely no incentive to leave Washington. He's on a perennial playoff team that can challenge for the East crown when the team is healthy. He likes the coach, loves the area and loves his teammates.

Sounds like a pipedream to me.

It's a pipe dream to say Washington is going to challenge for anything in the East when the team is healthy. I said it before i'll say it again I would welcome Jamison with open arms as our PF.

sec-106 · Post #30 » by **sec-106** » Sun Mar 16, 2008 3:01 pm

The Guilty Party wrote:

I would only offer Jamison a 3 year deal and have him here as a starter for the first year or two while the teams grooms the young PF and then use Jamison's expiring contract as trade bait in year three.

Adding him and the draft pick to this intact squad might not be a bad idea.

Miller
AI
Thad
Jamisom
Sam

LW
Green
Carney
Evans
Smith