ImageImageImage

Article on Nba.com -Surprising Sixers Spirit

Moderators: BullyKing, HartfordWhalers, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan

User avatar
IggyTheBEaST
RealGM
Posts: 14,452
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 31, 2003

Article on Nba.com -Surprising Sixers Spirit 

Post#1 » by IggyTheBEaST » Thu Apr 10, 2008 11:42 pm

===========

ITBs Dream Team:

Iverson/Iggy/Lebron/Amare/Dwight

I <3 Thaddeous
The Guilty Party
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 17,697
And1: 8
Joined: Aug 26, 2002
Location: Zoo Jersey
 

 

Post#2 » by The Guilty Party » Fri Apr 11, 2008 12:05 am

Thoughts? Something? Anything? Seriously... a link is all we get.
ryst
Banned User
Posts: 7,777
And1: 506
Joined: Feb 18, 2003

 

Post#3 » by ryst » Fri Apr 11, 2008 1:22 am

i didnt like the hate twards Ed Stefanski.
BK was fired because the terrible job he did during his entire time at the Sixers.
thats got nothing to do with Ed.
dond
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,483
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 25, 2003

 

Post#4 » by dond » Fri Apr 11, 2008 1:55 am

Nice Article. It is nice to see the Sixers getting some notice and Andre Miller especially.
User avatar
Pure Hatred
Sophomore
Posts: 198
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 07, 2008

 

Post#5 » by Pure Hatred » Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:12 am

Well earned respect :clap:
dbodner
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,474
And1: 536
Joined: Feb 18, 2002
Location: Philadelphia
Contact:

 

Post#6 » by dbodner » Fri Apr 11, 2008 3:27 am

ryst wrote:i didnt like the hate twards Ed Stefanski.
BK was fired because the terrible job he did during his entire time at the Sixers.
thats got nothing to do with Ed.


Which doesn't disprove the fact that Ed has taken entire more credit for the Sixers resurgence than he has earned. This is a credit to Mo, a credit to the players, and yes, even a credit to Billy King and his drafting. This has very little to do with Ed.
ankle420breaker
General Manager
Posts: 9,046
And1: 2,089
Joined: Sep 21, 2005
Location: South Jersey

 

Post#7 » by ankle420breaker » Fri Apr 11, 2008 3:29 am

I've been soaking in the league wide respect for the last 2 months...

FYI... watching the Clips/Lakers game on TNT... one of the commentators asked Reggie Miller if Thornton should be on the All Rookie Team and Reggie responded by saying, 'Horford and Durant have to be on there and I like that kid from Georgia Tech out in Philly, Thaddeus Young.' Its nice to see Thad getting props from a guy like Miller.
User avatar
barkley34
Veteran
Posts: 2,945
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 28, 2003
Location: Washington Township, NJ

 

Post#8 » by barkley34 » Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:04 am

We tried to dump Reggie Evans? That is news to me. Also he said we tried to trade Miller for Jason Williams, I am pretty sure we would have been getting back more than just Williams.

Also he said the Nuggets had to clear a back court slot for their newly acquired superstar. That is just wrong, Karl didn't want to part with Miller he only did because the Sixers insisted he was part of the deal.
User avatar
Wildfire
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,817
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 07, 2004

 

Post#9 » by Wildfire » Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:16 am

ankle420breaker wrote:I've been soaking in the league wide respect for the last 2 months...

FYI... watching the Clips/Lakers game on TNT... one of the commentators asked Reggie Miller if Thornton should be on the All Rookie Team and Reggie responded by saying, 'Horford and Durant have to be on there and I like that kid from Georgia Tech out in Philly, Thaddeus Young.' Its nice to see Thad getting props from a guy like Miller.


I don't like Thad's chances. But, if Durant is considered a guard, he has a chance. I think it will be..

C: Horford
PF: Scola
SF: Green or Moon
SG: Durant
PG: Navarro?/Conley?

Stats usually dictate rookie teams, and Thad's are lower than Moon's and Green's.
ryst
Banned User
Posts: 7,777
And1: 506
Joined: Feb 18, 2003

 

Post#10 » by ryst » Fri Apr 11, 2008 5:52 am

dbodner wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Which doesn't disprove the fact that Ed has taken entire more credit for the Sixers resurgence than he has earned. This is a credit to Mo, a credit to the players, and yes, even a credit to Billy King and his drafting. This has very little to do with Ed.


no one disprove that.
but the writer makes it look like Ed S. was trying to hurt the team by trading Korver and trying to deal Evans , and saying that Mo had to play the kids because he had no choice.
the writer may feel that BK got done wrong because he was fired but there is no need to make Ed S. look like he doesnt know what he is doing.

if the writer has problems with BK being fired he should take them with Ed Snider.
dond
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,483
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 25, 2003

 

Post#11 » by dond » Fri Apr 11, 2008 12:46 pm

barkley34 wrote:We tried to dump Reggie Evans? That is news to me. Also he said we tried to trade Miller for Jason Williams, I am pretty sure we would have been getting back more than just Williams.

Also he said the Nuggets had to clear a back court slot for their newly acquired superstar. That is just wrong, Karl didn't want to part with Miller he only did because the Sixers insisted he was part of the deal.


That was my understanding of the situation also. However, I don't know that for sure. Do you know that for sure ? If so .... how ?
darius08
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,254
And1: 10
Joined: Nov 19, 2004

 

Post#12 » by darius08 » Fri Apr 11, 2008 12:56 pm

dbodner wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Which doesn't disprove the fact that Ed has taken entire more credit for the Sixers resurgence than he has earned. This is a credit to Mo, a credit to the players, and yes, even a credit to Billy King and his drafting. This has very little to do with Ed.


Agree with the broad sentiment here except for one key word: Ed hasn't taken more credit than he deserves, he's been given more credit than he deserves. Ed's the first one to argue the credit falls to Cheeks and the players.
steveb21
Pro Prospect
Posts: 907
And1: 123
Joined: Nov 07, 2007
     

 

Post#13 » by steveb21 » Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:00 pm

Wow...I mean...wow. This crap article was on nba.com? The only thing he said of note was this:

Between shopping sprees at every player's favorite shoe store, the Sixers went 21-7. Only one team played better basketball, and they had to make history to do so.


I almost feel dumber after reading the whole thing.

Here's a couple of points that should've been considered before this article was posted:

It's widely acknowledged that BK was good at drafting. What he fails to mention is all the bad conctracts he gave out. He doesn't talk about the rotaing door of Larry Hughes, Tim Thomas, Keith Van Horn, Glenn Robinson, Chris Webber who were all failed attempts to give a supporting cast to Iverson. He doesn't mention that we had 3 first round picks last year and Billy failed to use them to move up in the draft to get the guy he really wanted. He also doesn't talk about how BK wasted one of those picks because he couldn't afford three guaranteed contracts..after he failed to get Yi. BK was fired because things weren't going as planned.

The guy talks about the Korver trade. He doesn't mention we got a first round pick for him. Cap space and a first round pick for a one dimentional player who was a second round pick is a pretty good return on investment.

I also recall that it was Pat Riley who wanted Andre Miller not Stefanski wanting Jason Williams. Not to mention, at that point in the season we were not in a playoff race so it might've made sense to trade Miller for more cap space. Ed did the smart thing by holding steady. I can't comment on a Reggie Evans trade because I didn't hear anything about that.

And lastly, Ed deserves a lot of credit for the success of this team by putting Cheeks in to position to play the young guys. Yeah, BK's fingerprints are on this team but so are Ed's. Just look at the records to see who's better at directing the ship.
Sixerscan
Senior Mod - 76ers
Senior Mod - 76ers
Posts: 33,946
And1: 16,326
Joined: Jan 25, 2005

 

Post#14 » by Sixerscan » Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:09 pm

This guy needs an editor
User avatar
barkley34
Veteran
Posts: 2,945
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 28, 2003
Location: Washington Township, NJ

 

Post#15 » by barkley34 » Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:28 pm

dond wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



That was my understanding of the situation also. However, I don't know that for sure. Do you know that for sure ? If so .... how ?


Which part are you asking me about Dond? Reggie Evans? It wasn't reported any where else we were trying to "dump" him like this guy stated. That was the 1st time I heard that mentioned.

Or the part about Andre Miller? George Karl has said several times he didn't want to include Miller and wanted to pair him with Iverson but the Sixers insisted on getting Miller in the deal. So the guy is wrong when he said they wanted to get rid of Miller to create room in their back court for AI.
arjwdotcom
Sophomore
Posts: 199
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 18, 2005
Location: Charlotte (Philly native)
Contact:

 

Post#16 » by arjwdotcom » Fri Apr 11, 2008 6:03 pm

It reads more like a blog than a news article/editorial; but one gets what they paid for I guess.

Still, its good to see some attention coming the Sixers way. Though I am thinking it would probably be better if so much attention doesn't come their way as they ARE young and ARE more likely to listen to hype. Given the effect Mo has had, one could say media attention could end up being something else he'd have to coach them against moreso than in other parts of their season.

Return to Philadelphia 76ers