ImageImageImage

Portland seeking experience ... (Andre Miller)?

Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Sixerscan, sixers hoops, Foshan

arjwdotcom
Sophomore
Posts: 199
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 18, 2005
Location: Charlotte (Philly native)
Contact:

 

Post#21 » by arjwdotcom » Sat Apr 19, 2008 12:51 am

While I think Miller would like to go to Portland (solid bigs there, suitable coaching staff); his value for the Sixers might be higher than what Portland will want to give. The Sixers would have to pick up a solid backup/starter at the point, and then they would be placing AI plus another youthier (ha) player in a leadership position. Unless I am missing something, we don't have that aspect in anyone currently on the roster else Miller would have already been gone.
carltong23
Junior
Posts: 458
And1: 6
Joined: Aug 01, 2006
Location: DE

 

Post#22 » by carltong23 » Sat Apr 19, 2008 6:39 am

How about instead of dealing with Portland we deal with the LA Clippers. They need a veteran point gaurd to team with Brand, Kaman, & Thorton so that they can get back into the playoffs. Heres my trade proposal(and I preference this with us trading Utah's 09 pick for Portlands #13 pick):

LA Clippers get:

Andre Miller
Portland's #13 pick
Sixers #16 pick

Philly gets:

Corey Maggette(must not opt out)
Brevin Knight(to match salaries)
Clippers #6 pick

With the Clippers pick we take Donte Greene. Then we use our cap space and a conditional future 1st round pick to take TJ Ford off of Toronto's hands. Our team would look like this:

Ford
Iguodala
Maggette
Greene
Dalembert

Bench:
Williams
Carney
Young
Evans
Smith

How about it?
User avatar
ahwi_quacoe
Senior
Posts: 530
And1: 3
Joined: Jun 30, 2004

 

Post#23 » by ahwi_quacoe » Sat Apr 19, 2008 7:50 am

Andre Miller is THE reason why we are playing well, No one else is as important. Decision making; knowing when to give it to Iguodala or take on the defense himself makes him invaluable. We trade him and we are back to square one. Keep him Trade Iguodala if need be.
freshie2
RealGM
Posts: 11,383
And1: 599
Joined: Jun 24, 2004

 

Post#24 » by freshie2 » Sat Apr 19, 2008 11:35 am

I agree he's a huge part of the success, but when they look at building a championship team, will he be as valuable to the team as he is now? It's a tough decision with Miller, and with Iguodala...if either can bring back multiple players and a PF, you'd have to consider it.
Wilfried
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,339
And1: 2,023
Joined: May 24, 2007

Re: Portland seeking experience ... (Andre Miller)? 

Post#25 » by Wilfried » Sat Apr 19, 2008 11:35 am

Fire BK wrote:
Andre Miller for the 13th pick seems like pretty even value to me... We all know Andre Miller is not the long-term solution at PG. I say flip him to POR for #13.


I would fire YOU immediately
Butter
General Manager
Posts: 8,728
And1: 384
Joined: Aug 14, 2002
Location: Youth movement, here we come
 

 

Post#26 » by Butter » Sun Apr 20, 2008 5:56 pm

What would it actually take to do this deal? I think any deal with the Blazers, the Sixers would probably ask for either Webster or Outlaw. Outlaw seems like a bit of duplication of Thadeus Young.

The Blazers do have quite a few PG's on their roster. Jarrett Jack could easily be included. I'd be really hesitant to give up Blake because of his perimeter shooting, but a combo of Jack/Blake would give the Sixers a pretty solid duo.

Also, is Iguodala a straight SF, or can be play SG?
Rip City, baby!!!!
eyeatoma
RealGM
Posts: 29,833
And1: 13,133
Joined: Feb 25, 2005
     

 

Post#27 » by eyeatoma » Sun Apr 20, 2008 6:03 pm

^^He plays SG just as well...
Red Robot
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,351
And1: 127
Joined: Oct 12, 2005
 

 

Post#28 » by Red Robot » Sun Apr 20, 2008 6:36 pm

Miller would be a one-year rental because he is much older than the Blazers' core and Portland is planning for cap space next summer. Miller would be a huge help next year, so the Blazers would love to exchange Miller's expiring for LaFrentz's. However, because he's not in the long-term plans, I can't really see Portland including much in the way of young players. I'm guessing that whatever the Blazers offer wouldn't be enough.

Miler would make Jack expendable, so he could be included. Maybe one of Rodriguez or the draft pick. I don't think the Blazers would want to part with Outlaw, Webster, Frye, or Blake in this deal, but it's possible.

Portland might like: Miller + Filler = LaFrentz + Jack + Draft Pick

Another possibility--one I'm not sure Portland would like--is:
Miller = Blake + Jack + (Frye or Webster)
Butter
General Manager
Posts: 8,728
And1: 384
Joined: Aug 14, 2002
Location: Youth movement, here we come
 

 

Post#29 » by Butter » Sun Apr 20, 2008 6:52 pm

Red Robot wrote:Miller would be a one-year rental because he is much older than the Blazers' core and Portland is planning for cap space next summer. Miller would be a huge help next year, so the Blazers would love to exchange Miller's expiring for LaFrentz's. However, because he's not in the long-term plans, I can't really see Portland including much in the way of young players. I'm guessing that whatever the Blazers offer wouldn't be enough.

Miler would make Jack expendable, so he could be included. Maybe one of Rodriguez or the draft pick. I don't think the Blazers would want to part with Outlaw, Webster, Frye, or Blake in this deal, but it's possible.

Portland might like: Miller + Filler = LaFrentz + Jack + Draft Pick

Another possibility--one I'm not sure Portland would like--is:
Miller = Blake + Jack + (Frye or Webster)


Red Robot, I think you are spot on about the primary pieces that would have to be involved. The Blazers GM feels they very close to championship contention, within a few years. A player lihe Miller could help them turn the corner in the short run, and them transition a young star PG for that longer championship run.

I do agree that they'd have to extend Miller though.

From Philly's perspective, I think the Blazers would give up one of Webster or Outlaw, Jack, maybe Blake, and some other fringe players. I don't know how much it would effect things, but the Blazers have 2 high second round picks, Josh McRoberts, and Joel Freeland (a PF bruiser from Europe).

I think there is definitely the potential for some kind of deal between these two teams.
Rip City, baby!!!!
AZ BLAZER
Starter
Posts: 2,359
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 09, 2005
Location: TEMPE, AZ.

 

Post#30 » by AZ BLAZER » Sun Apr 20, 2008 7:57 pm

Miller will be a free agent when Portland has their cap space. If he is considered too old to be part of the core now, and will be a year from now, why give up players like Webster, Outlaw or a lottery pick for him when you can just make a run at him in free agency? At least then he will cost half of what he is making now and you keep your other assets.
freshie2
RealGM
Posts: 11,383
And1: 599
Joined: Jun 24, 2004

 

Post#31 » by freshie2 » Sun Apr 20, 2008 9:37 pm

From a selfish/biased view, I would think Frye would need to be part of the deal, then I would think Webster and one of the young PGs. Problem is, I don't know if the $'s work in that scenario, in which case you have to add some other players to make things work...maybe Willie Green and Raef Lafrentz. Portland has a lot of young chips to deal, so they may give up a bit more to get a higher end PG, even if he's 32. Miller is a big upgrade over what they currently have, and would help any of the young PGs develop.
chuckerz
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,496
And1: 161
Joined: Jan 18, 2008

 

Post#32 » by chuckerz » Mon Apr 21, 2008 7:28 pm

why trade to rebuild when philly's in the playoffs and miller was a big factor in the getting them there
User avatar
c-mac 4.35
Sophomore
Posts: 119
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 27, 2008

 

Post#33 » by c-mac 4.35 » Tue Apr 22, 2008 6:07 pm

How do you guys feal about Webster... How would you think the sixers would utilize him???
tester551
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,524
And1: 1,237
Joined: Jan 10, 2005
Location: Missing the Coast & Trees

 

Post#34 » by tester551 » Tue Apr 22, 2008 8:40 pm

c-mac 4.35 wrote:How do you guys feal about Webster... How would you think the sixers would utilize him???


I personally want to keep Webster in Portland and would not include him in a deal to Philly. If Webster can get his handle down and has more confidence in driving to the basket - I think he could be lethal in Portland....

If Philly would deal Miller for Reaf + #13 + #34 (or Sergio) then I think a deal could be made.
freshie2
RealGM
Posts: 11,383
And1: 599
Joined: Jun 24, 2004

 

Post#35 » by freshie2 » Wed Apr 23, 2008 12:21 am

Then I don't think a deal could be made...I don't think the general idea of a deal between the teams is crazy, but Miller for draft picks and Raef is a bit silly.
User avatar
c-mac 4.35
Sophomore
Posts: 119
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 27, 2008

 

Post#36 » by c-mac 4.35 » Wed Apr 23, 2008 1:48 am

tester551 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I personally want to keep Webster in Portland and would not include him in a deal to Philly. If Webster can get his handle down and has more confidence in driving to the basket - I think he could be lethal in Portland....

If Philly would deal Miller for Reaf + #13 + #34 (or Sergio) then I think a deal could be made.



Like i said in the portland forum i've known him since i was 10... I know that he loves to play in Portland but i cant stand the way they utilize him their!!! He actually says some games he's told to stand in the corner and shoot 3's! He is way better off when he is attacking and slashing to the hoop!

Return to Philadelphia 76ers