ImageImageImage

No MLE for the Sixers

Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Sixerscan, sixers hoops, Foshan

GrandAdmiralDan
RealGM
Posts: 15,159
And1: 1,439
Joined: Jul 24, 2004
Location: New Berlin, WI (Milwaukee)
Contact:
     

Re: No MLE for the Sixers 

Post#61 » by GrandAdmiralDan » Tue Jul 1, 2008 3:12 am

The Guilty Party wrote:Take a look at Stefanski's quote for a second....


“We’ll see July 1 who has opted out, who is unrestricted and restricted,” he said. “Ourselves and Memphis are the only two teams that really have substantial money to deal with. So I think we can just go down our list and don’t forget, we have the (mid-level exception) too.”

The thing that jumps out to me is that the term "mid-level exception" was never actually said by Ed and apparently placed in the quote by author. Perhaps the author of this is wrong and believed Ed was referring to the MLE when he was talking about something else.



Perhaps he actually said/meant MSE or minimum salary exception. Teams always can use as many MSEs as they need. It is basically an unlimited exception that doesn't get granted on a limited basis and likewise isn't something that carries a cap hold that you need to renounce. I'd be somewhat surprised if Stefanski actually was mistaken about a basic CBA principle. Likely it is the quote that is incorrect. As was pointed out, they put that part in parentheses so he didn't actually say those exact words.

It seems that it has already been pretty well established that you will not have the MLE in addition to cap space, but I will my voice to the chorus of voices confirming that you will not.
I was one of a small handful of people who helped Larry Coon create the 2005 CBA FAQ, so perhaps that will help settle it for the few remaining holdouts :)

Also, I saw that killbuckner chimed in on this. He is very knowledgeable on these matters as well. If you have future questions that he happens to chime in on, the safe default assumption would be that what he says is accurate.
97-98
Nick Van Exel (LAL) on defending the Stockton-Malone pick-and-roll: "Yeah,
I got a way to defend it. Bring a bat to the game and kill one of them."
Phillyboy
Analyst
Posts: 3,400
And1: 19
Joined: Aug 04, 2002
Location: Philly

Re: No MLE for the Sixers 

Post#62 » by Phillyboy » Tue Jul 1, 2008 12:58 pm

Dabods,

Got up this morning and I was disappointed to read your response. It's truly a shame you feel you have to continue this. Isn't it obvious that you were mistaken and I'm not saying this to ring the bell for the next round.

My PM function doesn't work so when you reply with a link and a lock I was left no alternative but to post in the forum to get your attention. As TGP stated I really was trying to be kind yet pointed. Guess I missed the mark.

I have no intention of continuing this with you so you can have the last word. It was exactly this type of uneccesary banter that made me decide to leave before.

I'm not putting you on ignore but I won't address you again for a while after this. I'll then test the waters to see if you have any civility towards me. In the meantime I'll continue to discuss the Sixers with my fellow posters.

It's up to both of us. What say you?
sixers hoops
Senior Mod - 76ers
Senior Mod - 76ers
Posts: 10,073
And1: 3,523
Joined: Jun 28, 2002

Re: No MLE for the Sixers 

Post#63 » by sixers hoops » Tue Jul 1, 2008 1:13 pm

Well, I think the mid-level discussion has run its course. If Dabods has anything further to post, he can unlock this thread.

Return to Philadelphia 76ers