ImageImageImage

Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble

Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Sixerscan, sixers hoops, Foshan

The Guilty Party
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 17,697
And1: 8
Joined: Aug 26, 2002
Location: Zoo Jersey
 

Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble 

Post#21 » by The Guilty Party » Fri Sep 5, 2008 1:20 pm

According to Chris Broussard, this story goes as follows:

The smoke alarm in Chalmers/Arthur's room went off at 2AM in the morning. Hotel management went up to the room but the door was locked and they were told they could not come in. Management went and got security who opened the door and they found at least 2 women, the stench of marijuana, and someone (Arthur? Chalmers? Someone else?) in a locked bathroom flushing the toilet. The hotel called the cops, the cops came in and found nothing. Chalmers and Arthur stayed at the hotel that night (Tuesday Night/Wednesday Morning) and were sent home Wednesday by a pissed off Stern.

Ok... so here's pot smoking tip #2 that almost every college kid knows. The first was to put a towel under the door, the second is that if there is a smoke alarm in the room... you smoke in the bathroom with the shower running. What are they teaching the kids at KU??
geiger
Banned User
Posts: 1,665
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 17, 2008

Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble 

Post#22 » by geiger » Fri Sep 5, 2008 2:24 pm

People are bothered by it because it's against the law, because these guys are public figures, because many children view these guys as role models and try to emulate them. People might be bothered because in the last 5 months, more US men in uniform have died as a result of smuggling of pot from Mexico than US men in uniform dying in Iraq. People are bothered by it because these guys are young, rich, famous and seem to think that the laws don't apply to them and that they think they are above the law. People might be bothered by it because these guys play in a professional sports league where a number of players of late have been arrested for a variety of criminal acts. Some might be bothered by it because these guys are young, rich, good looking and black. People might be bothered by it because it is against the NBA rules. Not saying I agree with all or any of these reasons, but they are a few of the reasons why people might be bothered by it.
Loose Cannon
Senior
Posts: 700
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 06, 2008
Location: Houston

Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble 

Post#23 » by Loose Cannon » Fri Sep 5, 2008 4:16 pm

It's their personal lives. Professional athletes are not, these guys do have lives, and I guarantee the around the same percentage of people wouldn't approve of the population smoking pot either.
geiger
Banned User
Posts: 1,665
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 17, 2008

Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble 

Post#24 » by geiger » Fri Sep 5, 2008 7:14 pm

That I can be on board with 100%, but the money and fame have a price and in this case, your mistakes are out there for the world to judge. Most of us would probably take that trade off.
geiger
Banned User
Posts: 1,665
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 17, 2008

Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble 

Post#25 » by geiger » Fri Sep 5, 2008 7:23 pm

Rookies Mario Chalmers and Darrell Arthur could face a five-game suspension following their explosion from the NBA's Rookie Transition Program, according to South Florida Sun-Sentinel.

It has already been reported that Chalmers and Arthur have been fined $20,000, just as the Collective Bargaining Agreement suggests.

According to Article VI, Section 4(b) of the NBA's CBA, "When a player, without proper and reasonable excuse, fails or refuses to attend 'mandatory program,' he shall be fined $20,000 by the NBA." That clause also contains the wording "that if the player misses the Rookie Transition Program, he shall be suspended for five (5) games."

Of course, this situation is slightly different.

"That language was put in for a case in which a guy wants to skip it. …Nothing is definitive until the Commissioner makes a decision," NBA Vice President Tim Frank said Thursday.
Skates
Head Coach
Posts: 7,306
And1: 3,851
Joined: Feb 18, 2008
       

Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble 

Post#26 » by Skates » Fri Sep 5, 2008 7:26 pm

Arthur claims he was not using marijuana (hey Mario buddy, how do you like it there under the bus?) in this article:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3570994

The best part of the article is here:

"Sources told ESPN The Magazine's Chris Broussard that Chalmers and Arthur were caught in Arthur's room at the Doral Arrowwood resort in Rye Brook, N.Y., when a smoke alarm went off Wednesday at about 2 a.m. Hotel management went to the room, but the players refused to allow them in.

Management then left to get security, which used its own key to enter the room minutes later. Once inside, security found Chalmers, Arthur and at least two women, sources told Broussard. There was a strong stench of marijuana in the room, and one person was in the bathroom with the door locked, repeatedly flushing the toilet, sources said."

These guys are smooooooth. :lol:
The Guilty Party
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 17,697
And1: 8
Joined: Aug 26, 2002
Location: Zoo Jersey
 

Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble 

Post#27 » by The Guilty Party » Fri Sep 5, 2008 7:35 pm

This is where I get a little lost with this column. Which of the following is Broussard saying??

1) Security busts in and they see 2 women, Chalmers, and Arthur in the room with someone else in locked in a bathroom flushing the toilet??? If so, why didn't they just wait the person out?

or

2) Security found Chalmers, Arthur, and the 2 women when they got in the room but while they were trying to break in, they heard the toilet flushing and have no idea who was doing the flushing.

Is there a missing 5th person or not?

Return to Philadelphia 76ers