PhillyFan wrote:lol, true that.
but i meant, without Brand and not getting any big in return...not something I would even want to imagine
Kobblehead wrote:For as bad as Brand's contract as been, he's still been a force this year and probably our best all-around player. Trading him and getting nothing but freeing ourselves of his contract would not be in our best interest. Our frontcourt would be deadly thin.
Wow. I don't care if we have a cardboard cutout of Muggsy Bogues manning the middle, if we can clear Brand's salary then we need to jump on that without hesitation. What is this team's best interest? To hold onto players in their 30s with large contracts while not winning anything?