SelfishPlayer wrote:Porzingis played against the Warriors without Derrick Rose and Carmelo Anthony. He had a -21, scored 8 points, no blocks, and 5 rebounds in 35 minutes. Okafor has to had play without Carmelo and Rose level perimeter players his entire NBA career. Porzingis is really good, but he could have shown the basketball world another level of his game if he would have produced average to above average against the Warriors without help.
Using nbawowy:
The Knicks have actually been better with Porzingis on the court and Melo/Rose off than they have with all 3 on the court.
Porzingis w/o Rose/Melo = 102.0 points per 100, opponent 101.7 = +0.3
Porzingis w/ Rose/Melo = 113.1 points per 100, opponent 115.4 = -2.3
Difference = +2.6
Sixers w/ Okafor this year = 99.9 points per 100, opponent 112.0 = -12.1
Sixers w/o Okafor this year = 102.0 points per 100, opponent 107.3 = -5.3
The Sixers are 6.8 points worse with Okafor on the court. Basketballreference actually lists the difference as -7.8. Last year it was -10.0.
Also Nerlens played with the same scrubs as Okafor last year and was significantly better. Actually, Nerlens had to play with one more scrub than Okafor did...
Porzingis would still have been good playing for us last year. It's not like he was playing on an elite team - he played with his fair share of scrubs on a 32 win team.