https://theswishtheory.com/2025-nba-draft-articles/2025/06/contextualizing-production-vj-edgecombe-and-miles-byrd/The article basically argues that VJ Edgecombe was misused at Baylor. They ran a slow-paced, PnR-heavy offense that didn’t suit his strengths, especially with two bigs often on the floor, which clogged the paint. That kind of setup exposed his weaknesses, he’s not a polished ballhandler, can’t create efficiently in tight spaces, and struggles finishing in the halfcourt (just 49% at the rim and 44% on layups in non-transition).
That said, it’s not a death sentence. His rim struggles aren’t new, his AAU data flagged this too, but his athleticism and feel are still elite. He’s explosive off two feet, and his transition scoring is legit. It’s just that Baylor’s system didn’t give him many chances to attack downhill against a tilted defense.
What’s encouraging is his shooting profile. He came into college shooting 39% from three and around 80% from the line. The pull-up jumper isn’t there yet (24% on off-the-dribble threes), but his spot-up potential is strong. That gives him real value as an off-ball weapon.
The author positions VJ as a “utility guard” (think Josh Hart or Gary Payton II) but with a better jumper. He rebounds like a big, defends like a wing, and has the athletic tools to fill a role that flexes between perimeter and frontcourt responsibilities. You can use him as a spacer, a screener, or someone who attacks mismatches. In that context, his weaknesses are manageable.
He’s not going to be a lead initiator or high-volume creator, and trying to make him that (as Baylor did) actually lowers his value. But in a secondary or tertiary role, with NBA spacing and simplified reads, he could thrive. He’s the type of guy who helps you build flexible lineups without sacrificing spacing, defense, or physicality.
So they dont see him to be a lead guard or primary creator. But he’s also not just a glue guy. And there’s real upside here if you use him the right way.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.