ImageImageImage

Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3

Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Sixerscan, sixers hoops, Foshan

Murray_17
RealGM
Posts: 13,957
And1: 14,131
Joined: Mar 20, 2020
   

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1241 » by Murray_17 » Sat Jul 8, 2023 4:14 pm

Also, let's be honest. That stupid "white" party probably cost more than the tax penalties
Slacktard
RealGM
Posts: 13,319
And1: 24,095
Joined: Jun 26, 2006
         

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1242 » by Slacktard » Sat Jul 8, 2023 4:14 pm

mg wrote:Can they match and renegotiate the terms? This just reeks of Ainge using a loophole in order to gain another trade asset.


Nope. That's the thing about offer sheets. You have to match them exactly as they are. The NBA does have some things in place to prevent teams from front-loading or back-loading a deal because at one time a team would have like 3 yrs/$20m and had it be $15m/$5m/$5m if a team was in cap trouble or something.
Jailblazers7
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,494
And1: 6,271
Joined: Oct 23, 2017
     

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1243 » by Jailblazers7 » Sat Jul 8, 2023 4:15 pm

The second round loophole is also a nice bit of business by Reed’s agent. They know that the Sixers are likely to match & want to make sure Reed gets a fully guaranteed deal.
Jailblazers7
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,494
And1: 6,271
Joined: Oct 23, 2017
     

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1244 » by Jailblazers7 » Sat Jul 8, 2023 4:16 pm

The luxury tax is also irrelevant here. We have potential Harden & Harris trades to be made where we can easily find a way to get under that line before the season starts.
sixers hoops
Senior Mod - 76ers
Senior Mod - 76ers
Posts: 10,081
And1: 3,529
Joined: Jun 28, 2002

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1245 » by sixers hoops » Sat Jul 8, 2023 4:19 pm

Slacktard wrote:
Murray_17 wrote:
Slacktard wrote:Pay a guy $15m in 2024 who you are playing like 10 minutes a game?



The offer sheat is 23 million for 3 years. Where are the 15 million? :-?

Woj's second tweet.

I wonder if I misread what Woj says. Is it the final 2 years become fully guaranteed for a total of $15.7m and not (what I was thinking) $15.7m each year.


I thought the same thing for a few seconds
Andrew Toney
Senior
Posts: 513
And1: 260
Joined: Feb 23, 2017
 

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1246 » by Andrew Toney » Sat Jul 8, 2023 4:26 pm

Reed to Jazz

Morey crushing it
Slacktard
RealGM
Posts: 13,319
And1: 24,095
Joined: Jun 26, 2006
         

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1247 » by Slacktard » Sat Jul 8, 2023 4:28 pm

sixers hoops wrote:
Slacktard wrote:
Murray_17 wrote:

The offer sheat is 23 million for 3 years. Where are the 15 million? :-?

Woj's second tweet.

I wonder if I misread what Woj says. Is it the final 2 years become fully guaranteed for a total of $15.7m and not (what I was thinking) $15.7m each year.


I thought the same thing for a few seconds


Yea... So if we take it as a 3/23 and the last two years are 15.7. Then it might break down something like

Year 1: 7.3m, Year 2: 7.7m, Year 3: 8.0m

Make it out of the first round and the last 2 years are guaranteed and Reed's cap hit for 2024-2025 would probably be somewhere around 7.5m-7.8m.
mg
General Manager
Posts: 8,813
And1: 4,652
Joined: Jun 12, 2003

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1248 » by mg » Sat Jul 8, 2023 4:29 pm

Slacktard wrote:
mg wrote:Can they match and renegotiate the terms? This just reeks of Ainge using a loophole in order to gain another trade asset.


Nope. That's the thing about offer sheets. You have to match them exactly as they are. The NBA does have some things in place to prevent teams from front-loading or back-loading a deal because at one time a team would have like 3 yrs/$20m and had it be $15m/$5m/$5m if a team was in cap trouble or something.


Got it. If I'm the agent I would at least want that 2nd year fully guaranteed and not reliant on the team making the conf finals.
User avatar
Stanford
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 53,672
And1: 18,919
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Location: Parts Unknown
   

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1249 » by Stanford » Sat Jul 8, 2023 4:31 pm

That's an EASY match.
sixers hoops
Senior Mod - 76ers
Senior Mod - 76ers
Posts: 10,081
And1: 3,529
Joined: Jun 28, 2002

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1250 » by sixers hoops » Sat Jul 8, 2023 4:34 pm

Jailblazers7 wrote:The second round loophole is also a nice bit of business by Reed’s agent. They know that the Sixers are likely to match & want to make sure Reed gets a fully guaranteed deal.


I thought it said conference finals.

Doesn’t seem like a great loophole. If the Sixers don’t match, he essentially got his client a one year deal to play for a bad team. If he ends up getting a one year deal, wouldn’t he rather play for the Sixers? The playoff exposure would prob help him heading into unrestricted free agency.

Unless he really believes the Sixers will match, i wouldn’t want to discourage the better team from matching the contract.
User avatar
Stanford
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 53,672
And1: 18,919
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Location: Parts Unknown
   

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1251 » by Stanford » Sat Jul 8, 2023 4:35 pm

If they don't match this, I'm officially out.
sixers hoops
Senior Mod - 76ers
Senior Mod - 76ers
Posts: 10,081
And1: 3,529
Joined: Jun 28, 2002

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1252 » by sixers hoops » Sat Jul 8, 2023 4:39 pm

Stanford wrote:That's an EASY match.


You would think, but they really seem focused on not taking back deals greater than one year, and the Mo Bamba and Harrell deals seem like possible indications that they were planning not to match a Reed deal.

On the other hand, Reed is much more important than the guys they let walk, and Mo and Harrell deals are essentially nothing.

I guess I’m trying too hard to find clues in Morey’s haphazard plan.
Jailblazers7
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,494
And1: 6,271
Joined: Oct 23, 2017
     

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1253 » by Jailblazers7 » Sat Jul 8, 2023 4:40 pm

sixers hoops wrote:
Jailblazers7 wrote:The second round loophole is also a nice bit of business by Reed’s agent. They know that the Sixers are likely to match & want to make sure Reed gets a fully guaranteed deal.


I thought it said conference finals.

Doesn’t seem like a great loophole. If the Sixers don’t match, he essentially got his client a one year deal to play for a bad team. If he ends up getting a one year deal, wouldn’t he rather play for the Sixers? The playoff exposure would prob help him heading into unrestricted free agency.

Unless he really believes the Sixers will match, i wouldn’t want to discourage the better team from matching the contract.


I think it’s a fair & reasonable contract so I don’t really get why the Sixers would be discouraged from matching. The loophole is just a way to get him a fully guaranteed deal at his preferred destination. $8m is a highly tradeable contract for a 24 year old capable of playing both frontcourt spots with a proven playoff track record now so it’s not like we’re stuck with him forever.
sixers hoops
Senior Mod - 76ers
Senior Mod - 76ers
Posts: 10,081
And1: 3,529
Joined: Jun 28, 2002

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1254 » by sixers hoops » Sat Jul 8, 2023 4:40 pm

Stanford wrote:If they don't match this, I'm officially out.


My first reaction was that they wouldn’t match, but the optimism here is telling me it’s more of a no-brainer than I thought.
sixers hoops
Senior Mod - 76ers
Senior Mod - 76ers
Posts: 10,081
And1: 3,529
Joined: Jun 28, 2002

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1255 » by sixers hoops » Sat Jul 8, 2023 4:42 pm

Jailblazers7 wrote:
sixers hoops wrote:
Jailblazers7 wrote:The second round loophole is also a nice bit of business by Reed’s agent. They know that the Sixers are likely to match & want to make sure Reed gets a fully guaranteed deal.


I thought it said conference finals.

Doesn’t seem like a great loophole. If the Sixers don’t match, he essentially got his client a one year deal to play for a bad team. If he ends up getting a one year deal, wouldn’t he rather play for the Sixers? The playoff exposure would prob help him heading into unrestricted free agency.

Unless he really believes the Sixers will match, i wouldn’t want to discourage the better team from matching the contract.


I think it’s a fair & reasonable contract so I don’t really get why the Sixers would be discouraged from matching. The loophole is just a way to get him a fully guaranteed deal at his preferred destination. $8m is a highly tradeable contract for a 24 year old capable of playing both frontcourt spots with a proven playoff track record now so it’s not like we’re stuck with him forever.


I guess I’m struggling to figure out Morey’s plan. Letting McDaniels walk on that cheap contract led me to believe they only want one-year deals to clear cap space, but I actually have no clue what he is doing.
User avatar
Stanford
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 53,672
And1: 18,919
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Location: Parts Unknown
   

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1256 » by Stanford » Sat Jul 8, 2023 4:45 pm

sixers hoops wrote:planning not to match a Reed deal.


They haven't heard that I will be officially out if they don't. Once they do, they will match.
sixers hoops
Senior Mod - 76ers
Senior Mod - 76ers
Posts: 10,081
And1: 3,529
Joined: Jun 28, 2002

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1257 » by sixers hoops » Sat Jul 8, 2023 4:47 pm

Stanford wrote:
sixers hoops wrote:planning not to match a Reed deal.


They haven't heard that I will be officially out if they don't. Once they do, they will match.


B-ball owes you
User avatar
ProcessDoctor
RealGM
Posts: 11,642
And1: 6,400
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
   

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1258 » by ProcessDoctor » Sat Jul 8, 2023 4:48 pm

sixers hoops wrote:
Jailblazers7 wrote:
sixers hoops wrote:
I thought it said conference finals.

Doesn’t seem like a great loophole. If the Sixers don’t match, he essentially got his client a one year deal to play for a bad team. If he ends up getting a one year deal, wouldn’t he rather play for the Sixers? The playoff exposure would prob help him heading into unrestricted free agency.

Unless he really believes the Sixers will match, i wouldn’t want to discourage the better team from matching the contract.


I think it’s a fair & reasonable contract so I don’t really get why the Sixers would be discouraged from matching. The loophole is just a way to get him a fully guaranteed deal at his preferred destination. $8m is a highly tradeable contract for a 24 year old capable of playing both frontcourt spots with a proven playoff track record now so it’s not like we’re stuck with him forever.


I guess I’m struggling to figure out Morey’s plan. Letting McDaniels walk on that cheap contract led me to believe they only want one-year deals to clear cap space, but I actually have no clue what he is doing.


You wanna know his super secret plan?

Spoiler:
Run it back doe
2025-2026 Philadelphia 76ers:

Maxey/McCain/Lowry
Edgecombe/Grimes/Gordon
George/Oubre/Edwards
Barlow/Watford/Walker
Embiid/Bona/Drummond/Broome
zaz102
Starter
Posts: 2,144
And1: 1,293
Joined: Nov 08, 2016

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1259 » by zaz102 » Sat Jul 8, 2023 4:52 pm

It would be a shame if he's not retained. He's the only backup C I've seen behind Embiid that could somewhat hold down the fort during the playoffs. And that's with Doc refusing to play him much during the regular season. And from what I read from Magic fans, I wouldn't expect much from Bamba.

I only want pay money to guys that would contribute in the playoffs and he's one of them and really the only one of their FA group.

Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
Skates
Head Coach
Posts: 7,307
And1: 3,851
Joined: Feb 18, 2008
       

Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3 

Post#1260 » by Skates » Sat Jul 8, 2023 4:52 pm

Hopefully Morey hasn’t confused run it back with run it backwards.

Return to Philadelphia 76ers