Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Sixerscan, sixers hoops, Foshan
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
-
Murray_17
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,957
- And1: 14,131
- Joined: Mar 20, 2020
-
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
Also, let's be honest. That stupid "white" party probably cost more than the tax penalties
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
-
Slacktard
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,319
- And1: 24,095
- Joined: Jun 26, 2006
-
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
mg wrote:Can they match and renegotiate the terms? This just reeks of Ainge using a loophole in order to gain another trade asset.
Nope. That's the thing about offer sheets. You have to match them exactly as they are. The NBA does have some things in place to prevent teams from front-loading or back-loading a deal because at one time a team would have like 3 yrs/$20m and had it be $15m/$5m/$5m if a team was in cap trouble or something.
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
-
Jailblazers7
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,494
- And1: 6,271
- Joined: Oct 23, 2017
-
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
The second round loophole is also a nice bit of business by Reed’s agent. They know that the Sixers are likely to match & want to make sure Reed gets a fully guaranteed deal.
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
-
Jailblazers7
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,494
- And1: 6,271
- Joined: Oct 23, 2017
-
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
The luxury tax is also irrelevant here. We have potential Harden & Harris trades to be made where we can easily find a way to get under that line before the season starts.
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
-
sixers hoops
- Senior Mod - 76ers

- Posts: 10,081
- And1: 3,529
- Joined: Jun 28, 2002
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
Slacktard wrote:Murray_17 wrote:Slacktard wrote:Pay a guy $15m in 2024 who you are playing like 10 minutes a game?
The offer sheat is 23 million for 3 years. Where are the 15 million?
Woj's second tweet.
I wonder if I misread what Woj says. Is it the final 2 years become fully guaranteed for a total of $15.7m and not (what I was thinking) $15.7m each year.
I thought the same thing for a few seconds
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
-
Andrew Toney
- Senior
- Posts: 513
- And1: 260
- Joined: Feb 23, 2017
-
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
Reed to Jazz
Morey crushing it
Morey crushing it
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
-
Slacktard
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,319
- And1: 24,095
- Joined: Jun 26, 2006
-
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
sixers hoops wrote:Slacktard wrote:Murray_17 wrote:
The offer sheat is 23 million for 3 years. Where are the 15 million?
Woj's second tweet.
I wonder if I misread what Woj says. Is it the final 2 years become fully guaranteed for a total of $15.7m and not (what I was thinking) $15.7m each year.
I thought the same thing for a few seconds
Yea... So if we take it as a 3/23 and the last two years are 15.7. Then it might break down something like
Year 1: 7.3m, Year 2: 7.7m, Year 3: 8.0m
Make it out of the first round and the last 2 years are guaranteed and Reed's cap hit for 2024-2025 would probably be somewhere around 7.5m-7.8m.
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
-
mg
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,813
- And1: 4,652
- Joined: Jun 12, 2003
-
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
Slacktard wrote:mg wrote:Can they match and renegotiate the terms? This just reeks of Ainge using a loophole in order to gain another trade asset.
Nope. That's the thing about offer sheets. You have to match them exactly as they are. The NBA does have some things in place to prevent teams from front-loading or back-loading a deal because at one time a team would have like 3 yrs/$20m and had it be $15m/$5m/$5m if a team was in cap trouble or something.
Got it. If I'm the agent I would at least want that 2nd year fully guaranteed and not reliant on the team making the conf finals.
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
- Stanford
- Forum Mod

- Posts: 53,672
- And1: 18,919
- Joined: Feb 07, 2005
- Location: Parts Unknown
-
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
That's an EASY match.
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
-
sixers hoops
- Senior Mod - 76ers

- Posts: 10,081
- And1: 3,529
- Joined: Jun 28, 2002
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
Jailblazers7 wrote:The second round loophole is also a nice bit of business by Reed’s agent. They know that the Sixers are likely to match & want to make sure Reed gets a fully guaranteed deal.
I thought it said conference finals.
Doesn’t seem like a great loophole. If the Sixers don’t match, he essentially got his client a one year deal to play for a bad team. If he ends up getting a one year deal, wouldn’t he rather play for the Sixers? The playoff exposure would prob help him heading into unrestricted free agency.
Unless he really believes the Sixers will match, i wouldn’t want to discourage the better team from matching the contract.
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
- Stanford
- Forum Mod

- Posts: 53,672
- And1: 18,919
- Joined: Feb 07, 2005
- Location: Parts Unknown
-
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
If they don't match this, I'm officially out.
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
-
sixers hoops
- Senior Mod - 76ers

- Posts: 10,081
- And1: 3,529
- Joined: Jun 28, 2002
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
Stanford wrote:That's an EASY match.
You would think, but they really seem focused on not taking back deals greater than one year, and the Mo Bamba and Harrell deals seem like possible indications that they were planning not to match a Reed deal.
On the other hand, Reed is much more important than the guys they let walk, and Mo and Harrell deals are essentially nothing.
I guess I’m trying too hard to find clues in Morey’s haphazard plan.
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
-
Jailblazers7
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,494
- And1: 6,271
- Joined: Oct 23, 2017
-
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
sixers hoops wrote:Jailblazers7 wrote:The second round loophole is also a nice bit of business by Reed’s agent. They know that the Sixers are likely to match & want to make sure Reed gets a fully guaranteed deal.
I thought it said conference finals.
Doesn’t seem like a great loophole. If the Sixers don’t match, he essentially got his client a one year deal to play for a bad team. If he ends up getting a one year deal, wouldn’t he rather play for the Sixers? The playoff exposure would prob help him heading into unrestricted free agency.
Unless he really believes the Sixers will match, i wouldn’t want to discourage the better team from matching the contract.
I think it’s a fair & reasonable contract so I don’t really get why the Sixers would be discouraged from matching. The loophole is just a way to get him a fully guaranteed deal at his preferred destination. $8m is a highly tradeable contract for a 24 year old capable of playing both frontcourt spots with a proven playoff track record now so it’s not like we’re stuck with him forever.
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
-
sixers hoops
- Senior Mod - 76ers

- Posts: 10,081
- And1: 3,529
- Joined: Jun 28, 2002
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
Stanford wrote:If they don't match this, I'm officially out.
My first reaction was that they wouldn’t match, but the optimism here is telling me it’s more of a no-brainer than I thought.
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
-
sixers hoops
- Senior Mod - 76ers

- Posts: 10,081
- And1: 3,529
- Joined: Jun 28, 2002
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
Jailblazers7 wrote:sixers hoops wrote:Jailblazers7 wrote:The second round loophole is also a nice bit of business by Reed’s agent. They know that the Sixers are likely to match & want to make sure Reed gets a fully guaranteed deal.
I thought it said conference finals.
Doesn’t seem like a great loophole. If the Sixers don’t match, he essentially got his client a one year deal to play for a bad team. If he ends up getting a one year deal, wouldn’t he rather play for the Sixers? The playoff exposure would prob help him heading into unrestricted free agency.
Unless he really believes the Sixers will match, i wouldn’t want to discourage the better team from matching the contract.
I think it’s a fair & reasonable contract so I don’t really get why the Sixers would be discouraged from matching. The loophole is just a way to get him a fully guaranteed deal at his preferred destination. $8m is a highly tradeable contract for a 24 year old capable of playing both frontcourt spots with a proven playoff track record now so it’s not like we’re stuck with him forever.
I guess I’m struggling to figure out Morey’s plan. Letting McDaniels walk on that cheap contract led me to believe they only want one-year deals to clear cap space, but I actually have no clue what he is doing.
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
- Stanford
- Forum Mod

- Posts: 53,672
- And1: 18,919
- Joined: Feb 07, 2005
- Location: Parts Unknown
-
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
sixers hoops wrote:planning not to match a Reed deal.
They haven't heard that I will be officially out if they don't. Once they do, they will match.
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
-
sixers hoops
- Senior Mod - 76ers

- Posts: 10,081
- And1: 3,529
- Joined: Jun 28, 2002
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
Stanford wrote:sixers hoops wrote:planning not to match a Reed deal.
They haven't heard that I will be officially out if they don't. Once they do, they will match.
B-ball owes you
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
- ProcessDoctor
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,642
- And1: 6,400
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
-
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
sixers hoops wrote:Jailblazers7 wrote:sixers hoops wrote:
I thought it said conference finals.
Doesn’t seem like a great loophole. If the Sixers don’t match, he essentially got his client a one year deal to play for a bad team. If he ends up getting a one year deal, wouldn’t he rather play for the Sixers? The playoff exposure would prob help him heading into unrestricted free agency.
Unless he really believes the Sixers will match, i wouldn’t want to discourage the better team from matching the contract.
I think it’s a fair & reasonable contract so I don’t really get why the Sixers would be discouraged from matching. The loophole is just a way to get him a fully guaranteed deal at his preferred destination. $8m is a highly tradeable contract for a 24 year old capable of playing both frontcourt spots with a proven playoff track record now so it’s not like we’re stuck with him forever.
I guess I’m struggling to figure out Morey’s plan. Letting McDaniels walk on that cheap contract led me to believe they only want one-year deals to clear cap space, but I actually have no clue what he is doing.
You wanna know his super secret plan?
Spoiler:
2025-2026 Philadelphia 76ers:
Maxey/McCain/Lowry
Edgecombe/Grimes/Gordon
George/Oubre/Edwards
Barlow/Watford/Walker
Embiid/Bona/Drummond/Broome
Maxey/McCain/Lowry
Edgecombe/Grimes/Gordon
George/Oubre/Edwards
Barlow/Watford/Walker
Embiid/Bona/Drummond/Broome
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
-
zaz102
- Starter
- Posts: 2,144
- And1: 1,293
- Joined: Nov 08, 2016
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
It would be a shame if he's not retained. He's the only backup C I've seen behind Embiid that could somewhat hold down the fort during the playoffs. And that's with Doc refusing to play him much during the regular season. And from what I read from Magic fans, I wouldn't expect much from Bamba.
I only want pay money to guys that would contribute in the playoffs and he's one of them and really the only one of their FA group.
Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
I only want pay money to guys that would contribute in the playoffs and he's one of them and really the only one of their FA group.
Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
-
Skates
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,307
- And1: 3,851
- Joined: Feb 18, 2008
-
Re: Sixers Offseason Thread Part 3
Hopefully Morey hasn’t confused run it back with run it backwards.




