Sixers Offseason thread/ sixerfan1976 updated to page 84

SixerFever215 · Post #141 » by **SixerFever215** » Sat Jun 23, 2012 4:51 pm

so the 76ers don't like al jefferson

Post #142 » by **HartfordWhalers** » Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:00 pm

DiLeo is a Clipper GM candidate.

http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/22 ... lippers_GM

bigdavid · Post #143 » by **bigdavid** » Sat Jun 23, 2012 6:57 pm

corwin wrote:Well, if they're not adding the 7 or 8 pick by trade, it would seem that they don't think Waiters, Lamb, Rivers, etc. will be a major impact guy. If that's the case, I agree, there is no way they should take on Biedrins or Jefferson for two years. Draft the BPA at 15 & get your shooter elsewhere. I think Korver's contract isn't guaranteed & Chicago is way over the LT. Have you heard of any interest in bringing him back if he becomes a FA?

If Korver is available I would love to have him...especially if we loose LW.

BarkleyFan · Post #144 » by **BarkleyFan** » Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:08 pm

My question about the proposed Toronto trade would concern Ed Davis. He seems like a similar player to what John Henson can give us (whom we seem to like). If we think that Davis and Henson are fairly equal, then it may make sense to make the trade and move up to #8. Obviously, if we don't like Davis very much, then it wouldn't be worth it.

bmyers3317 · Post #145 » by **bmyers3317** » Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:10 pm

SixerFever215 wrote:so the 76ers don't like al jefferson

Richard Jefferson as part of any deal with Golden State they are referring to.

phiphan · Post #146 » by **phiphan** » Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:43 pm

BarkleyFan wrote:My question about the proposed Toronto trade would concern Ed Davis. He seems like a similar player to what John Henson can give us (whom we seem to like). If we think that Davis and Henson are fairly equal, then it may make sense to make the trade and move up to #8. Obviously, if we don't like Davis very much, then it wouldn't be worth it.

Davis is pretty much worthless.

bmyers3317 · Post #147 » by **bmyers3317** » Sat Jun 23, 2012 8:05 pm

SixerFever215 wrote:so the 76ers don't like al jefferson

Richard Jefferson as part of any deal with Golden State they are referring to.

ExplosionsInDaSky · Post #148 » by **ExplosionsInDaSky** » Sat Jun 23, 2012 8:08 pm

I'm all for the Toronto deal but we are keeping the 15th pick if we do that deal. Offer up a second round pick for christ sake or a lotto protected first.

SparksFly87 · Post #149 » by **SparksFly87** » Sat Jun 23, 2012 8:34 pm

Could we nab Barganani and 8pick from Toronto?

ExplosionsInDaSky · Post #150 » by **ExplosionsInDaSky** » Sat Jun 23, 2012 8:57 pm

SparksFly87 wrote:Could we nab Barganani and 8pick from Toronto?

It was stated that Toronto didn't want to part with him. However I would give up Iggy and 15 for Bargs and 8 if it was offered.

Mike Louch · Post #151 » by **Mike Louch** » Sat Jun 23, 2012 9:04 pm

ExplosionsInDaSky wrote:
SparksFly87 wrote:Could we nab Barganani and 8pick from Toronto?

It was stated that Toronto didn't want to part with him. However I would give up Iggy and 15 for Bargs and 8 if it was offered.

I would definitely take Barganani and #8 for Iggy and the 15th pick. I have to take a look at Barg's contract first tho. At 8 we would probably be in line to nab Waiters or Lamb also. I like it. Would still need an athletic big or shot blocker however to play alongside Barg's. Have no clue where to find that guy however. Maybe bring back Sammy D 8-)

, or spend both 2nd's on big men.

phillysixed · Post #152 » by **phillysixed** » Sat Jun 23, 2012 9:37 pm

^ Would love such a deal but it seems too good to be true.

If it were to happen, I would not hesitate for a second on offering HIbbert a max deal. Can you frontload an offer (with Brand's cap space being freed up) to where IND can't possibly match or is that against the CBA?

BarkleyFan · Post #153 » by **BarkleyFan** » Sat Jun 23, 2012 9:40 pm

What players would we most likely have to take back from Sacramento if we moved Iguodala for pick 5 (salary cap purposes) ? Also, just curious - hypothetically if we had the #2 pick who would we choose?

Post #154 » by **HartfordWhalers** » Sat Jun 23, 2012 10:42 pm

phillysixed wrote:^ Would love such a deal but it seems too good to be true.

If it were to happen, I would not hesitate for a second on offering HIbbert a max deal. Can you frontload an offer (with Brand's cap space being freed up) to where IND can't possibly match or is that against the CBA?

Indy can match anything anyone can offer, and can actually offer more.

SJSF · Post #155 » by **SJSF** » Sat Jun 23, 2012 10:50 pm

toronto will not trade Barg for Iggy no way. And to think they would also swap picks too...lol

BarkleyFan · Post #156 » by **BarkleyFan** » Sat Jun 23, 2012 10:52 pm

SJSF wrote:toronto will not trade Barg for Iggy no way. And to think they would also swap picks too...lol

Yeah pretty sure that's not what they are offering. And they want us to give up Igs and 15 to move up, which we are laughing at. Don't know if there is a happy medium.

Do the Jrue · Post #157 » by **Do the Jrue** » Sun Jun 24, 2012 12:40 am

Hmmm...we brought in Teague for a private workout. What does this mean?

Cru Thik · Post #158 » by **Cru Thik** » Sun Jun 24, 2012 1:09 am

Do the Jrue wrote:Hmmm...we brought in Teague for a private workout. What does this mean?

Means we suck :-?

Mik317 · Post #159 » by **Mik317** » Sun Jun 24, 2012 1:25 am

lol.

Cru Thik could be right or he could be a target in case a trade back (Boston) is in order.

We do technically need a point guard....with Lou opting out. Teague could be a solid replacement...but not at 15.

He could also be a guy we buy an extra pick for if he drops a bit.

Or we could just be crazy and pick him..

CURVEBALL MOFOS

sixerfan1976 · Post #160 » by **sixerfan1976** » Sun Jun 24, 2012 2:04 am

if Andre is traded before/during the draft....Golden state is now the front runner. They have aggressively pursued Andre in the last 24 hours.

They came to us and asked us if we took Richard Jefferson ...they would send us additionally either Brandon Rush or Dorrell Wright as well in a deal for Andre that still included #7. The two teams will talk more as we get closer to draft. From what I heard, we would keep #15 but may give up a future first or maybe our two 2nds..something like that.

We liked Henson the most today....he is a distinct possibility if we moved to 7...also liked Perry jones workout as well. Drummond is evidently a possibility but the front office is split on him(not sure who is his biggest supporter and who is the biggest detractor)

We have also talked to OKC about buying their pick at 28 depending on what we do earlier in the draft(no specifics given)

things are pretty fluid but the big news is GSW massive attempt of late to try and make this work.

Sounded liked if something went down- drummond/henson at 7.......then hopefully ross at 15 but there are some in front office that love waiters at 7. Gonna be a fun week leading up to draft