I already knew some of ya'll were
but now some of ya'll are takin it to new heights with the posts in this threadModerators: BullyKing, HartfordWhalers, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan
but now some of ya'll are takin it to new heights with the posts in this threadMik317 wrote:I swear you simply like to be a contrarian sometimes
Doc stinks as a coach. Just tonight he had Maxey on SGA; he took Biid out too soon, he featured Trez on offense during his stint, and then as we got it closer the first time spamming Biid was the actual answer...we went away from it.
He constantly made the wrong choice. Sometimes yeah a move doesn't work out...but all of them? His lack of adjustments and general lack of a second idea has cost his teams time and time again throughout his entire career..going back to Orlando ffs. Is it all on him? Of course not... no ONE person holds responsibility for anything regarding basketball...HOWEVER his job is to put the team in the correct spots to overcome down nights from players, hot nights from opponents...that means putting the right guys out there for example...something Doc has always struggled with. He has lived off of his ONE ring for decades now and even then he should have two but because he couldn't overcome the loss of Kendric **** Perkins he doesn't.
I cannot believe we are even having this discussion honestly. Ben got rightfully shat on for the Hawks series but I still say havign Danny on Trae in game one was the actual turning point....it allowed the Hawks to believe they could hang. Also lost in Ben's implosion was the fact that dude had Seth Curry on Huerter as he was killing us in Game 7. Yeah Biid could have been better with the ball. Not denying that. Yeah Ben could have had some balls....totally agree. I am in no way removing the players from the equation here especially the best players...but the fact remains that Doc failed at his own job as well...and it is a constant theme throughout his career. You keep bringing up Kawhii and PG bad shooting night as this teflon defense when it shouldn't even come to that if Doc would have just not played Trez....he gives the other team life and confidence and makes his own teams have to clean up his mess and that just doesn't always work out. Its been so long but I wonder how many games that Celtics team had to grit out due to Doc overplaying his hand...i remember a lot of clutch shots had to be made...which is nice but was it necessary?
And yeah coaches don't get fired unless the best players want them gone...but there is no way you go into next season with Doc if you are a serious franchise. Even under your dream world of him actually doing a good job...we are at the stage in which our only remaining move before the rebuild is to fire the coach anyway....
76Love wrote:Some of you guys really need a break from here
I already knew some of ya'll werebut now some of ya'll are takin it to new heights with the posts in this thread
76Love wrote:Some of you guys really need a break from here
I already knew some of ya'll werebut now some of ya'll are takin it to new heights with the posts in this thread
Mik317 wrote:
Its been so long but I wonder how many games that Celtics team had to grit out due to Doc overplaying his hand...i remember a lot of clutch shots had to be made...which is nice but was it necessary?
76ciology wrote:
My take? We need to play more close games in reg season and be really good at in. We dont have a good win-loss record on close game, and we only shoot 40%. While Nets, Celts and Bucks are top teams in close games.
Murray_17 wrote:The Celtics that won the title should have sweep their way to the finals and instead went 7 against the Hawks, 7 against The Lebron Cavs and 6 against the corpse of the Pistons.
Mik317 wrote:76Love wrote:Some of you guys really need a break from here
I already knew some of ya'll werebut now some of ya'll are takin it to new heights with the posts in this thread
we willingly root for the Philadelphia 76ers
I thought the mental illness was obvious
76ciology wrote:Good NetRtg and Good at winning close games, that should be what we should try to be good at. That version of ourselves is the Nets.
Murray_17 wrote:76ciology wrote:Good NetRtg and Good at winning close games, that should be what we should try to be good at. That version of ourselves is the Nets.
The point is, if you have a good-great NeRtg, you aren't playing that many close games
Jailblazers7 wrote:Embiid, Harden, PJ, and Tobias all have more than enough close game playoff experience (results not always great lol). Even young guys like Melton & Maxey have taken their lumps.
Regular season basketball won’t significantly improve the odds of Embiid or Harden finally putting it together in the biggest moments.
76Love wrote:Some of you guys really need a break from here
I already knew some of ya'll werebut now some of ya'll are takin it to new heights with the posts in this thread
76ciology wrote:
Cavs +4.9 NetRtg 27 close games
Sixers +4 NetRtg 19 close games
Murray_17 wrote:76ciology wrote:
Cavs +4.9 NetRtg 27 close games
Sixers +4 NetRtg 19 close games
Sorry, what do you understand for "close game"? because i saw the schedule and the Cavs have 10 games decided by 5 points or less.
If your answer is 10 points, then sure, your prerogative but that would mean that an average NBA game is a "close game" because no team has a plus 10 netrtg right now. Under that definition we're playing a lot of close games
phillynative wrote:Are we too predictable down the stretch of close games?