Cheatergriffin wrote:Unbreakable99 wrote:Simmons25 wrote:
I think most people thought the trade was best for both teams. Boston didn't want a point guard/shooting guard (They had IT and then Irving) and we needed a combo guard who happened to be consensus #1 pick in the draft.
Not sure why Celtics fans are happy about Fultz not playing. What they should really be ecstatic about is that Josh Jackson told Danny Ainge to go f himself whilst on a plane... because that is what really saved them from having a disastrous draft.
It doesn’t matter what happened. Ainge got the better end of the trade. It was obvious then and even more obvious now. And we both know why Celtics fans are happy Fultz isn’t playing. It’s becausr he plays for a division rival and most people thought Fultz was the best prospect so it makes them feel good most people were wrong so they want to see Fultz fail. Seeing him fail will make them even happier. I hate Boston fans. They are so unbearable. BC did this. He and the Cavs just helped the Celtics tremendously. The Cavs gave them Kyrie and we gave them a high draft pick in 2028 or 2019.
So we are determining trades now as clear winners after 15 games of the first year the trade takes place? Way too early to say anything was obvious about that trade. Does it seem like boston won the trade now? Yes. Has fultz only played 4 games w/ a flukey injury and questionable mechanics on his shot? Yes. Does tatum look good? Yes.
Still think its way too early to give winners and losers in a trade involving rookies. Boston fans probably thought marcus smart was a better pick too than embiid at the time. Give it time
You’re forgetting the high draft pick Boston will also get from the trade.
