Iverson Armband wrote:I think the one thing we can all agree on is that there is ALOT of talent in the NBA.
Yup. Thats why nobody should be untouchable. You are rooting for THE TEAM not THE PLAYER
Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan
Iverson Armband wrote:I think the one thing we can all agree on is that there is ALOT of talent in the NBA.
Jailblazers7 wrote:Happy for Killian Hayes for sure. The NBA is always better when talented guards like him figure it out.
Great for the Pistons too. I’d be looking to trade him for a young wing with his trade value boosted.
the_process wrote:Jailblazers7 wrote:Happy for Killian Hayes for sure. The NBA is always better when talented guards like him figure it out.
Great for the Pistons too. I’d be looking to trade him for a young wing with his trade value boosted.
Hayes for Thybulle? I'll take that shot even though we know Hayes immediately turns back to a pumpkin as soon as he gets off the plane in Philly.
Negrodamus wrote:Spoiler:
And NAW won them that game! Clutch final two steals.
Kobblehead wrote:Between Duren, Williams, and Kessler, I think Duren was the correct pick for the guy coming off the board first.
He's the youngest, he's the best athlete, and he's the best passer of the three. They're all quality bigs, though. Chet is the ace, but there are three other starting Cs in this draft behind him, IMO. Really strong draft for that C position.
76ciology wrote:Which williams? Jalen Williams?
Duren.
Defensively he projects to be a Bam Adebayo type defender. Mobile, good rebounder, strong, athletic but not much of a rim protector (Duren 1.3 per 36 blks per game), this is consistent to his days in college.
Offensively, Duren is shooting below 50% on FTs. He is nowhere near as good as Bam. No disrespect, but Comparing Duren (.9 apg per 36) to Bam on offense is like comparing D12 to Jokic.
Overall, I think Duren will have a good career because of his tools and where he was drafted. He will get his opportunity to shine and he’d be great at it because he can be a switchable defended from 1-5, great defender and rebounder plus a great lob threat around the paint. Even Nick Claxton can play that role.
Kobblehead wrote:76ciology wrote:Which williams? Jalen Williams?
Duren.
Defensively he projects to be a Bam Adebayo type defender. Mobile, good rebounder, strong, athletic but not much of a rim protector (Duren 1.3 per 36 blks per game), this is consistent to his days in college.
Offensively, Duren is shooting below 50% on FTs. He is nowhere near as good as Bam. No disrespect, but Comparing Duren (.9 apg per 36) to Bam on offense is like comparing D12 to Jokic.
Overall, I think Duren will have a good career because of his tools and where he was drafted. He will get his opportunity to shine and he’d be great at it because he can be a switchable defended from 1-5, great defender and rebounder plus a great lob threat around the paint. Even Nick Claxton can play that role.
Mark Williams from Duke.
Bam went through A TON of development with his freethrows and playmaking to get to this point, though. It's not a fair comparison if you're looking at what Bam has become verses what Duren is at the start. Let's look back to their college output for a more fair perspective.
Adebayo at Kentucky: 65.3% free throw, 4.7% assist
Duren at Memphis: 62.5% free throw, 10.5% assist
Duren was actually a BETTER playmaker than Adebayo as a prospect.
Bam was a 20 year old rookie. Duren played the first three months of his rookie year at age 18. In two years, I bet his playmaking and free throws make major improvements and he looks a lot closer to Bam on offense (but far better on defense than Bam can even dream of).