ImageImageImage

The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV

Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Sixerscan, sixers hoops, Foshan

youngcrev
RealGM
Posts: 28,786
And1: 9,699
Joined: Jun 12, 2005
Location: Philadelphia(ish)
   

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1581 » by youngcrev » Sat Jan 30, 2021 3:43 pm

Ferry Avenue wrote:
youngcrev wrote:
Ferry Avenue wrote:That doesn't seem very threatening to me. In other words, I'm not losing any sleep about to play Simmons's new team by virtue of his presence on it.

Compare that to any player in the league regarded as a closer (LeBron, Harden, Durant, Butler, Leonard, George, Giannis, etc. -- even Jayson Tatum) and it's a completely different feeling. I'm concerned about those players' ability to beat me by themselves in the clutch. Simmons, not even close.


Giannis is regarded as a closer? News to me. Seems like that's Middleton's job to me, which has similar question marks to our team's set up. Embiid's a far better late game option than Giannis is in terms of scoring in the half court and making his free throws.

But anyway, those guys you listed are simply better than Ben, of course they're a bigger threat in general. Top-15 (and with some of the names, top-5) players are bigger threats than top-30 players.

If your point is that you worry more about scorers, sure. There's more potential for those types to have a hot shooting game and destroy you. In general I think people worry more about Donovan Mitchell than Rudy Gobert against the Jazz, even though Gobert is the best/most impactful player on their team. I'm not sure worry-level is a perfect barometer of impact.

Regardless, is someone trading us an elite player for Ben? I guess that's what I'm missing here. If Morey can get us a guy that's clearly better in a deal, he should probably do it. Until then, do we really need to harp so heavily on what Ben can't do that we ignore the things that he does do so well? I get the frustration with him, but he's clearly an impactful player in general. If you replace him with a guy that does the things he doesn't, but does none of things that he does do well (like say, Zach LaVine) you're left with a clearly worse overall product on the floor.

And I guess that's the issue when you boil it down, that this team as it's currently configured needs for Simmons to be a top player or it won't be competitive with the best teams in the league in a playoff series. Certainly when it drafted him #1 overall it envisioned that. He hasn't developed in that manner however.

Trust the process was the deal back then. Well we trusted the process, but it didn't result in enough firepower. The missing piece is precisely Simmons's lack of development.


That feels like your own misplaced expectation though. He was never going to be an elite perimeter scorer. Being drafted #1 doesn't change that. The other #1 pick that we had was supposed to be that guy. And then Jimmy was supposed to be that guy. And then based on the contract they gave Tobias (as a guy that's primary role is that if a scorer), I guess they thought to some extent he could be that guy.

That's not to say there wasn't an expectation that he'd be better than he currently is based on early returns. He's turned himself into a defensive stud, but the offensive improvement has been stagnant.
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 66,098
And1: 27,044
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1582 » by 76ciology » Sat Jan 30, 2021 4:08 pm

Zumramania wrote:No, our biggest fail was drafting Fultz. 45 out of 73 first draft picks made at least one all star game appearance, so drafting Fultz was a mistake which a competent franchise should not do. He had a bad workout with us and that should have been enough of a red flag for something as serious and franchise-defining as the first draft pick. Simmons' lack of development also hurts us but I don't really know what can be done about it. I guess the coaching staff is already doing what they can. We should either be concerned with finding other pieces or even trade him eventually if the right opportunity comes along.


Can you blame the franchise when Fultz mysteriously injured his shoulder?

I dont blame them for drafting Fultz. Fultz is still the type of player this team needs even since 3-4 years ago. We still try to find it with Harden or Beal.

Drafting Ben on the other hand is more of our fault. Draft analysts have already said that Ben is shooting with the wrong hand. They even had articles about how Ben could be more like Draymond Green than LeBron James. And still, we drafted him. Why? Because he’s the sexy pick.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
Iverson Armband
Veteran
Posts: 2,978
And1: 2,504
Joined: Nov 26, 2020
 

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1583 » by Iverson Armband » Sat Jan 30, 2021 4:26 pm

76ciology wrote:
Zumramania wrote:No, our biggest fail was drafting Fultz. 45 out of 73 first draft picks made at least one all star game appearance, so drafting Fultz was a mistake which a competent franchise should not do. He had a bad workout with us and that should have been enough of a red flag for something as serious and franchise-defining as the first draft pick. Simmons' lack of development also hurts us but I don't really know what can be done about it. I guess the coaching staff is already doing what they can. We should either be concerned with finding other pieces or even trade him eventually if the right opportunity comes along.


Can you blame the franchise when Fultz mysteriously injured his shoulder?

I dont blame them for drafting Fultz. Fultz is still the type of player this team needs even since 3-4 years ago. We still try to find it with Harden or Beal.

Drafting Ben on the other hand is more of our fault. Draft analysts have already said that Ben is shooting with the wrong hand. They even had articles about how Ben could be more like Draymond Green than LeBron James. And still, we drafted him. Why? Because he’s the sexy pick.

There were a lot of respected draft experts who said there was a reasonable chance Brandon Ingram would be better.

They were right.
always a jump shot away.
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 66,098
And1: 27,044
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1584 » by 76ciology » Sat Jan 30, 2021 4:31 pm

Iverson Armband wrote:
76ciology wrote:
Zumramania wrote:No, our biggest fail was drafting Fultz. 45 out of 73 first draft picks made at least one all star game appearance, so drafting Fultz was a mistake which a competent franchise should not do. He had a bad workout with us and that should have been enough of a red flag for something as serious and franchise-defining as the first draft pick. Simmons' lack of development also hurts us but I don't really know what can be done about it. I guess the coaching staff is already doing what they can. We should either be concerned with finding other pieces or even trade him eventually if the right opportunity comes along.


Can you blame the franchise when Fultz mysteriously injured his shoulder?

I dont blame them for drafting Fultz. Fultz is still the type of player this team needs even since 3-4 years ago. We still try to find it with Harden or Beal.

Drafting Ben on the other hand is more of our fault. Draft analysts have already said that Ben is shooting with the wrong hand. They even had articles about how Ben could be more like Draymond Green than LeBron James. And still, we drafted him. Why? Because he’s the sexy pick.

There were a lot of respected draft experts who said there was a reasonable chance Brandon Ingram would be better.

They were right.


Agree.

Its one thing to fail because of bad luck and to fail because of poor judgement.

And for mistakes, i dont really mind it. Because everyone make mistakes. What I have an issue from is NOT ACCEPTING a mistake.

How can you learn and be better if you keep insisting you dont make a mistake?

If we keep fooling ourselves on how special he is rather than accepting for what he just is, man.. this entire program that we started back in 2013 will slowly go into it’s slow death as Ben’s career.

Get out before everyone finds out. That’s what Jerry West used to say.

If they believe Ben is that wizard who get shooters their 3s, then let them believe it.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
Iverson Armband
Veteran
Posts: 2,978
And1: 2,504
Joined: Nov 26, 2020
 

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1585 » by Iverson Armband » Sat Jan 30, 2021 4:31 pm

I will say this, I give Simmons credit for realizing early he was so bad offensively, that he better be elite on defense in order to be a useful player in the NBA. Kudos to him for recognizing that.
always a jump shot away.
zaz102
Starter
Posts: 2,141
And1: 1,288
Joined: Nov 08, 2016

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1586 » by zaz102 » Sat Jan 30, 2021 4:32 pm

76ciology wrote:
Zumramania wrote:No, our biggest fail was drafting Fultz. 45 out of 73 first draft picks made at least one all star game appearance, so drafting Fultz was a mistake which a competent franchise should not do. He had a bad workout with us and that should have been enough of a red flag for something as serious and franchise-defining as the first draft pick. Simmons' lack of development also hurts us but I don't really know what can be done about it. I guess the coaching staff is already doing what they can. We should either be concerned with finding other pieces or even trade him eventually if the right opportunity comes along.


Can you blame the franchise when Fultz mysteriously injured his shoulder?

I dont blame them for drafting Fultz. Fultz is still the type of player this team needs even since 3-4 years ago. We still try to find it with Harden or Beal.

Drafting Ben on the other hand is more of our fault. Draft analysts have already said that Ben is shooting with the wrong hand. They even had articles about how Ben could be more like Draymond Green than LeBron James. And still, we drafted him. Why? Because he’s the sexy pick.
What? Ben draft pick was our fault?

He is one of the best if not the best players from the draft. Plus, he can still be traded for a good haul I'm sure.

Obviously, his play poses challenges for the team (which may not be the case if they were able to find a star to play alongside him and Embiid), but not sure how you can view Ben pick being negative.
Iverson Armband
Veteran
Posts: 2,978
And1: 2,504
Joined: Nov 26, 2020
 

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1587 » by Iverson Armband » Sat Jan 30, 2021 4:36 pm

zaz102 wrote:
76ciology wrote:
Zumramania wrote:No, our biggest fail was drafting Fultz. 45 out of 73 first draft picks made at least one all star game appearance, so drafting Fultz was a mistake which a competent franchise should not do. He had a bad workout with us and that should have been enough of a red flag for something as serious and franchise-defining as the first draft pick. Simmons' lack of development also hurts us but I don't really know what can be done about it. I guess the coaching staff is already doing what they can. We should either be concerned with finding other pieces or even trade him eventually if the right opportunity comes along.


Can you blame the franchise when Fultz mysteriously injured his shoulder?

I dont blame them for drafting Fultz. Fultz is still the type of player this team needs even since 3-4 years ago. We still try to find it with Harden or Beal.

Drafting Ben on the other hand is more of our fault. Draft analysts have already said that Ben is shooting with the wrong hand. They even had articles about how Ben could be more like Draymond Green than LeBron James. And still, we drafted him. Why? Because he’s the sexy pick.
What? Ben draft pick was our fault?

He is one of the best if not the best players from the draft. Plus, he can still be traded for a good haul I'm sure.

Obviously, his play poses challenges for the team (which may not be the case if they were able to find a star to play alongside him and Embiid), but not sure how you can view Ben pick being negative.

If wasn’t a bad pick, but he’s not better than the next two guys drafted after him.
always a jump shot away.
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 66,098
And1: 27,044
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1588 » by 76ciology » Sat Jan 30, 2021 4:38 pm

zaz102 wrote:
76ciology wrote:
Zumramania wrote:No, our biggest fail was drafting Fultz. 45 out of 73 first draft picks made at least one all star game appearance, so drafting Fultz was a mistake which a competent franchise should not do. He had a bad workout with us and that should have been enough of a red flag for something as serious and franchise-defining as the first draft pick. Simmons' lack of development also hurts us but I don't really know what can be done about it. I guess the coaching staff is already doing what they can. We should either be concerned with finding other pieces or even trade him eventually if the right opportunity comes along.


Can you blame the franchise when Fultz mysteriously injured his shoulder?

I dont blame them for drafting Fultz. Fultz is still the type of player this team needs even since 3-4 years ago. We still try to find it with Harden or Beal.

Drafting Ben on the other hand is more of our fault. Draft analysts have already said that Ben is shooting with the wrong hand. They even had articles about how Ben could be more like Draymond Green than LeBron James. And still, we drafted him. Why? Because he’s the sexy pick.
What? Ben draft pick was our fault?

He is one of the best if not the best players from the draft. Plus, he can still be traded for a good haul I'm sure.

Obviously, his play poses challenges for the team (which may not be the case if they were able to find a star to play alongside him and Embiid), but not sure how you can view Ben pick being negative.


Because there were red flags were all over the place when it comes to his shooting.

And anyone who knows basketball should know that shooting is the most valuable skillset for a guard. Hell.. Milton doesnt even have a decent dribbling and passing skill but he can run the PnR way better than Ben. Just think about that.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
Sixerscan
Senior Mod - 76ers
Senior Mod - 76ers
Posts: 33,946
And1: 16,328
Joined: Jan 25, 2005

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1589 » by Sixerscan » Sat Jan 30, 2021 4:41 pm

76ciology wrote:
zaz102 wrote:
76ciology wrote:
Can you blame the franchise when Fultz mysteriously injured his shoulder?

I dont blame them for drafting Fultz. Fultz is still the type of player this team needs even since 3-4 years ago. We still try to find it with Harden or Beal.

Drafting Ben on the other hand is more of our fault. Draft analysts have already said that Ben is shooting with the wrong hand. They even had articles about how Ben could be more like Draymond Green than LeBron James. And still, we drafted him. Why? Because he’s the sexy pick.
What? Ben draft pick was our fault?

He is one of the best if not the best players from the draft. Plus, he can still be traded for a good haul I'm sure.

Obviously, his play poses challenges for the team (which may not be the case if they were able to find a star to play alongside him and Embiid), but not sure how you can view Ben pick being negative.


Because there were red flags were all over the place when it comes to his shooting.

And anyone who knows basketball should know that shooting is the most valuable skillset for a guard. Hell.. Milton doesnt even have a decent dribbling and passing skill but he can run the PnR way better than Ben. Just think about that.

I guess the members of the media that voted him all-nba and the coaches that voted him to the all star team twice don't know anything about basketball.
zaz102
Starter
Posts: 2,141
And1: 1,288
Joined: Nov 08, 2016

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1590 » by zaz102 » Sat Jan 30, 2021 4:50 pm

Sixerscan wrote:
76ciology wrote:
zaz102 wrote:What? Ben draft pick was our fault?

He is one of the best if not the best players from the draft. Plus, he can still be traded for a good haul I'm sure.

Obviously, his play poses challenges for the team (which may not be the case if they were able to find a star to play alongside him and Embiid), but not sure how you can view Ben pick being negative.


Because there were red flags were all over the place when it comes to his shooting.

And anyone who knows basketball should know that shooting is the most valuable skillset for a guard. Hell.. Milton doesnt even have a decent dribbling and passing skill but he can run the PnR way better than Ben. Just think about that.

I guess the members of the media that voted him all-nba and the coaches that voted him to the all star team twice don't know anything about basketball.
So, they could trade for a shooter if they really need to. Do you really think that either options below are true?

A) Brown or Ingram would give Sixers significantly better chance to win a championship.

B) Brown's or Ingram's trade value is much higher than Simmons (to trade for a shooter).

I dont think either A or B is true. Not sure what either have done in playoffs to prove otherwise for A. B is a little more subjective I guess.
youngcrev
RealGM
Posts: 28,786
And1: 9,699
Joined: Jun 12, 2005
Location: Philadelphia(ish)
   

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1591 » by youngcrev » Sat Jan 30, 2021 4:50 pm

76ciology wrote:
zaz102 wrote:
76ciology wrote:
Can you blame the franchise when Fultz mysteriously injured his shoulder?

I dont blame them for drafting Fultz. Fultz is still the type of player this team needs even since 3-4 years ago. We still try to find it with Harden or Beal.

Drafting Ben on the other hand is more of our fault. Draft analysts have already said that Ben is shooting with the wrong hand. They even had articles about how Ben could be more like Draymond Green than LeBron James. And still, we drafted him. Why? Because he’s the sexy pick.
What? Ben draft pick was our fault?

He is one of the best if not the best players from the draft. Plus, he can still be traded for a good haul I'm sure.

Obviously, his play poses challenges for the team (which may not be the case if they were able to find a star to play alongside him and Embiid), but not sure how you can view Ben pick being negative.


Because there were red flags were all over the place when it comes to his shooting.

And anyone who knows basketball should know that shooting is the most valuable skillset for a guard. Hell.. Milton doesnt even have a decent dribbling and passing skill but he can run the PnR way better than Ben. Just think about that.


Shake runs it way better than Embiid too.

And Korkmaz shoots way better than Giannis.
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 66,098
And1: 27,044
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1592 » by 76ciology » Sat Jan 30, 2021 5:54 pm

youngcrev wrote:
76ciology wrote:
zaz102 wrote:What? Ben draft pick was our fault?

He is one of the best if not the best players from the draft. Plus, he can still be traded for a good haul I'm sure.

Obviously, his play poses challenges for the team (which may not be the case if they were able to find a star to play alongside him and Embiid), but not sure how you can view Ben pick being negative.


Because there were red flags were all over the place when it comes to his shooting.

And anyone who knows basketball should know that shooting is the most valuable skillset for a guard. Hell.. Milton doesnt even have a decent dribbling and passing skill but he can run the PnR way better than Ben. Just think about that.


Shake runs it way better than Embiid too.

And Korkmaz shoots way better than Giannis.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
youngcrev
RealGM
Posts: 28,786
And1: 9,699
Joined: Jun 12, 2005
Location: Philadelphia(ish)
   

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1593 » by youngcrev » Sat Jan 30, 2021 5:58 pm

Ah, missed that distinction.

But is Ben a guard?
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 66,098
And1: 27,044
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1594 » by 76ciology » Sat Jan 30, 2021 6:12 pm

youngcrev wrote:Ah, missed that distinction.

But is Ben a guard?


Yeah, he’s our point guard.

A point guard has perhaps the most specialized role of any position. Point guards are expected to run the team's offense by controlling the ball and making sure that it gets to the right player at the right time. Above all, the point guard must understand and accept their coach's game plan; in this way, the position can be compared to a quarterback in American football, a catcher in baseball or a playmaker in soccer (association football). They must also be able to adapt to what the defense is allowing and must control the pace of the game


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point_guard
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
youngcrev
RealGM
Posts: 28,786
And1: 9,699
Joined: Jun 12, 2005
Location: Philadelphia(ish)
   

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1595 » by youngcrev » Sat Jan 30, 2021 6:30 pm

76ciology wrote:
youngcrev wrote:Ah, missed that distinction.

But is Ben a guard?


Yeah, he’s our point guard.

A point guard has perhaps the most specialized role of any position. Point guards are expected to run the team's offense by controlling the ball and making sure that it gets to the right player at the right time. Above all, the point guard must understand and accept their coach's game plan; in this way, the position can be compared to a quarterback in American football, a catcher in baseball or a playmaker in soccer (association football). They must also be able to adapt to what the defense is allowing and must control the pace of the game


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point_guard


Glad that's settled...

Where's the part about shooting or pick and roll in that definition?
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 66,098
And1: 27,044
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1596 » by 76ciology » Sat Jan 30, 2021 6:39 pm

youngcrev wrote:
76ciology wrote:
youngcrev wrote:Ah, missed that distinction.

But is Ben a guard?


Yeah, he’s our point guard.

A point guard has perhaps the most specialized role of any position. Point guards are expected to run the team's offense by controlling the ball and making sure that it gets to the right player at the right time. Above all, the point guard must understand and accept their coach's game plan; in this way, the position can be compared to a quarterback in American football, a catcher in baseball or a playmaker in soccer (association football). They must also be able to adapt to what the defense is allowing and must control the pace of the game


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point_guard


Glad that's settled...

Where's the part about shooting or pick and roll in that definition?


Glad you asked..

read the entire wikipedia description about point guard and you’ll see this below


Among the taller players who have enjoyed success at the position is Ben Simmons, who at 6 ft 10 in (2.08 m) won the 2018 National Basketball Association Rookie of the Year Award. Behind him is Magic Johnson, who at 6 ft 9 in (2.06 m) won the National Basketball Association Most Valuable Player Award three times in his career. Other point guards who have been named NBA MVP include Bob Cousy, Oscar Robertson, Derrick Rose, and Russell Westbrook, and two-time winners Steve Nash and Stephen Curry. In the NBA, point guards generally range from 6 ft 2 in (1.88 m) to 6 ft 4 in (1.93 m) whereas in the WNBA, point guards are usually 5 ft 9 in (1.75 m) or shorter. Having above-average size (height, muscle) is considered advantageous, although size is secondary to situational awareness, speed, quickness, and ball handling skills. At 5 ft 3 in (1.60 m) the shortest player in NBA history, Muggsy Bogues enjoyed a 14-year career as a point guard. Shorter players tend to be better dribblers since they are closer to the floor, and thus have better control of the ball while dribbling.


Passing skills, ball handling, and court vision are crucial. Speed is important; a speedy point guard is better able to create separation and space off the dribble, giving themselves room to work. Point guards are often valued more for their assist totals than for their scoring. Another major evaluation factor is assist-to-turnover ratio, which reflects the decision-making skills of the player. Still, a first-rate point guard should also have a reasonably effective jump shot.


:lol:
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
HardenToSixers
Rookie
Posts: 1,095
And1: 682
Joined: Nov 18, 2020
 

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1597 » by HardenToSixers » Sat Jan 30, 2021 6:40 pm

Ben was viewed as one of the biggest young superstars in the league and could’ve been traded for such a haul after the end of the win streak he led. Arguing the pick was bad is nearly as ridiculous as trying to say the Sixers FO wasn’t doing a terrible job after Hinkie and just got unlucky.
HardenToSixers
Rookie
Posts: 1,095
And1: 682
Joined: Nov 18, 2020
 

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1598 » by HardenToSixers » Sat Jan 30, 2021 6:41 pm

If you buy a stock at 20 and it rises to 100 and then crashes to 1, you don’t blame buying it at 20, you blame not selling it at 80+.
HardenToSixers
Rookie
Posts: 1,095
And1: 682
Joined: Nov 18, 2020
 

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1599 » by HardenToSixers » Sat Jan 30, 2021 6:46 pm

76ciology wrote:
youngcrev wrote:
76ciology wrote:
Yeah, he’s our point guard.



https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point_guard


Glad that's settled...

Where's the part about shooting or pick and roll in that definition?


Glad you asked..

read the entire wikipedia description about point guard and you’ll see this below


Among the taller players who have enjoyed success at the position is Ben Simmons, who at 6 ft 10 in (2.08 m) won the 2018 National Basketball Association Rookie of the Year Award. Behind him is Magic Johnson, who at 6 ft 9 in (2.06 m) won the National Basketball Association Most Valuable Player Award three times in his career. Other point guards who have been named NBA MVP include Bob Cousy, Oscar Robertson, Derrick Rose, and Russell Westbrook, and two-time winners Steve Nash and Stephen Curry. In the NBA, point guards generally range from 6 ft 2 in (1.88 m) to 6 ft 4 in (1.93 m) whereas in the WNBA, point guards are usually 5 ft 9 in (1.75 m) or shorter. Having above-average size (height, muscle) is considered advantageous, although size is secondary to situational awareness, speed, quickness, and ball handling skills. At 5 ft 3 in (1.60 m) the shortest player in NBA history, Muggsy Bogues enjoyed a 14-year career as a point guard. Shorter players tend to be better dribblers since they are closer to the floor, and thus have better control of the ball while dribbling.


Passing skills, ball handling, and court vision are crucial. Speed is important; a speedy point guard is better able to create separation and space off the dribble, giving themselves room to work. Point guards are often valued more for their assist totals than for their scoring. Another major evaluation factor is assist-to-turnover ratio, which reflects the decision-making skills of the player. Still, a first-rate point guard should also have a reasonably effective jump shot.


:lol:
I think you’re making his point for him. A PG should have those skills. Judging Simmons as a bad player because he’s been a PG and doesn’t have those skills is unfair when he would grade out well as a power/point forward. There’s no reason to be so dogmatic and obsessed with positions.

He’s a solid player but not what the hype was made out to be and probably not the best fit for our team. That’s okay and still makes him a good pick and likely a player we should’ve traded sooner.
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 66,098
And1: 27,044
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: The Ben Simmons Megathread - Part IV 

Post#1600 » by 76ciology » Sat Jan 30, 2021 6:57 pm

HardenToSixers wrote:If you buy a stock at 20 and it rises to 100 and then crashes to 1, you don’t blame buying it at 20, you blame not selling it at 80+.


It didn’t rose to 100 though. It only had the upside to be 100.

It’s 20 with an upside to be 100 and it’s now less than 20 because it has no upside to be 100.

Your definition is more applicable to maybe Derrick Rose when he won MVP.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.

Return to Philadelphia 76ers