2016-2017 College Basketball / '17 NBA Draft Thread

cksdayoff · Post #161 » by **cksdayoff** » Fri Nov 18, 2016 4:44 am

5 assists now

phantom84 · Post #162 » by **phantom84** » Fri Nov 18, 2016 5:30 am

Damn, Fultz has some sweet moves. Need to get him in this upcoming draft.

sixerhp3 · Post #163 » by **sixerhp3** » Fri Nov 18, 2016 5:35 am

All in for Fultz baby, would be a dream scenario.

Post #164 » by **CoreyGallagher** » Fri Nov 18, 2016 5:58 am

sixerhp3 wrote:All in for Fultz baby, would be a dream scenario.

I opened this thread to post this.

eagereyez · Post #165 » by **eagereyez** » Fri Nov 18, 2016 6:24 am

Fultz through his first 2 games:

32.5 Pts
6 Ast
4.5 Reb
.68 FG%
.50 3P%

Sixers are gonna need the #1 pick if they want this kid.

Bigballer74 · Post #166 » by **Bigballer74** » Fri Nov 18, 2016 6:31 am

Fultz is the player this team so desperately needs. The thought of him, Biid, and Simmons, gets me excited.

cksdayoff · Post #167 » by **cksdayoff** » Fri Nov 18, 2016 10:46 am

fultz has everything you want in an offensive player. he has a nice wingspan too. he has deceptive athleticism like brandon roy and james harden

Kolkmania · Post #168 » by **Kolkmania** » Fri Nov 18, 2016 12:02 pm

Everybody agrees we're drafting Fultz with our #1 pick and OG Anunoby with Lakers' #7 pick? Let's get into our time machine and start 2017/2018 with Markelle Fultz - JJ Redick - OG Anunoby - Ben Simmons - Joel Embiid. Process. :pray:

islanders11040 · Post #169 » by **islanders11040** » Fri Nov 18, 2016 5:22 pm

Hey knicks fan here. Is it accurate to say that the % chance of 76ers getting a top 3 pick is the combined odds of 76ers and Sac town? So as of now (if standings held) they have a 75% chance of getting a top 3 pick (60 +15)?

sixerswillrule · Post #170 » by **sixerswillrule** » Fri Nov 18, 2016 5:54 pm

Watch on YouTube

The move at 4:00

Winejk · Post #171 » by **Winejk** » Fri Nov 18, 2016 6:33 pm

I like what I've seen from Fultz so far, but his stats will be inflated in Washington's guard oriented scheme. Washington has produced some guards with great stats like Wroten, Dejounte Murray, Nate Robinson, and Isiah Thomas. So he's going to produce. I'll be watching the little subtleties and nuances of his game more than his stats. Even though he maybe doesn't possess top end athleticism, he is smooth and always under control.

Unbreakable99 · Post #172 » by **Unbreakable99** » Fri Nov 18, 2016 8:25 pm

So nobody answered my question about Josh Hart. I like this guy. Not many people are talking about him. He's a senior. I don't care. This guy seems like he will be a nice piece on an NBA team. I think he can be a late lotto or late first round pick. Does anyone else think he can be a better version of Danny Green? He can shoot 3s. He can create his own shot. He can defend. He has good size. This guy is a two way player. He's also a smart player.

TTP · Post #173 » by **TTP** » Fri Nov 18, 2016 8:30 pm

Unbreakable99 wrote:So nobody answered my question about Josh Hart. I like this guy. Not many people are talking about him. He's a senior. I don't care. This guy seems like he will be a nice piece on an NBA team. I think he can be a late lotto or late first round pick. Does anyone else think he can be a better version of Danny Green? He can shoot 3s. He can create his own shot. He can defend. He has good size. This guy is a two way player. He's also a smart player.

He's shooting well in college from 3 but college FT% is actually a better indicator of NBA 3 point success than college 3 is. He's only a 70% shooter from the line so there's definitely concern that his shooting won't translate. Doesn't look very long and gets an ok but not great amount of steals. Probably a second rounder.

Unbreakable99 · Post #174 » by **Unbreakable99** » Fri Nov 18, 2016 8:34 pm

TTP wrote:
Unbreakable99 wrote:So nobody answered my question about Josh Hart. I like this guy. Not many people are talking about him. He's a senior. I don't care. This guy seems like he will be a nice piece on an NBA team. I think he can be a late lotto or late first round pick. Does anyone else think he can be a better version of Danny Green? He can shoot 3s. He can create his own shot. He can defend. He has good size. This guy is a two way player. He's also a smart player.

He's shooting well in college from 3 but college FT% is actually a better indicator of NBA 3 point success than college 3 is. He's only a 70% shooter from the line so there's definitely concern that his shooting won't translate. Doesn't look very long and gets an ok but not great amount of steals. Probably a second rounder.

So with that said how similar do you think he can be to Danny Green? Do you think he projects to be better or worse than Green?

TTP · Post #175 » by **TTP** » Fri Nov 18, 2016 8:40 pm

Unbreakable99 wrote:
TTP wrote:
Unbreakable99 wrote:So nobody answered my question about Josh Hart. I like this guy. Not many people are talking about him. He's a senior. I don't care. This guy seems like he will be a nice piece on an NBA team. I think he can be a late lotto or late first round pick. Does anyone else think he can be a better version of Danny Green? He can shoot 3s. He can create his own shot. He can defend. He has good size. This guy is a two way player. He's also a smart player.

He's shooting well in college from 3 but college FT% is actually a better indicator of NBA 3 point success than college 3 is. He's only a 70% shooter from the line so there's definitely concern that his shooting won't translate. Doesn't look very long and gets an ok but not great amount of steals. Probably a second rounder.

So with that said how similar do you think he can be to Danny Green? Do you think he projects to be better or worse than Green?

Green's pretty elite at his role, hard to project anyone outside of the top few picks to be a better NBA player than that. Doubt Hart projects to be >35%, whereas Green is 40%+ for his career.

Unbreakable99 · Post #176 » by **Unbreakable99** » Fri Nov 18, 2016 8:45 pm

TTP wrote:
Unbreakable99 wrote:
TTP wrote:
He's shooting well in college from 3 but college FT% is actually a better indicator of NBA 3 point success than college 3 is. He's only a 70% shooter from the line so there's definitely concern that his shooting won't translate. Doesn't look very long and gets an ok but not great amount of steals. Probably a second rounder.

So with that said how similar do you think he can be to Danny Green? Do you think he projects to be better or worse than Green?

Green's pretty elite at his role, hard to project anyone outside of the top few picks to be a better NBA player than that. Doubt Hart projects to be >35%, whereas Green is 40%+ for his career.

Hart may not be a better 3point shooter but he seems like he can create his shot better. He seems like he's a better dribbler and can attack the basket better. Hart seems like he can be comparable on D. With the exception of 3 point shooting I think they are pretty similar. Hart seems to be more athletic and faster which could translate into a better defender.

TTP · Post #177 » by **TTP** » Fri Nov 18, 2016 9:04 pm

Unbreakable99 wrote:
TTP wrote:
Unbreakable99 wrote:
So with that said how similar do you think he can be to Danny Green? Do you think he projects to be better or worse than Green?

Green's pretty elite at his role, hard to project anyone outside of the top few picks to be a better NBA player than that. Doubt Hart projects to be >35%, whereas Green is 40%+ for his career.

Hart may not be a better 3point shooter but he seems like he can create his shot better. He seems like he's a better dribbler and can attack the basket better. Hart seems like he can be comparable on D. With the exception of 3 point shooting I think they are pretty similar. Hart seems to be more athletic and faster which could translate into a better defender.

Maybe just need a different player comp then. Green's a lot longer than Hart. If I'm looking for defense to translate, I'm looking at college steal and block rates, wingspan, and athleticism.

Mik317 · Post #178 » by **Mik317** » Fri Nov 18, 2016 9:18 pm

not falling in love with any prospect...

cksdayoff · Post #179 » by **cksdayoff** » Sat Nov 19, 2016 12:05 am

we're probably not getting fultz. the guy is gonna put up huge numbers all season long because he handles the ball and his front court is ass.

Unbreakable99 · Post #180 » by **Unbreakable99** » Sat Nov 19, 2016 12:42 am

cksdayoff wrote:we're probably not getting fultz. the guy is gonna put up huge numbers all season long because he handles the ball and his front court is ass.

Why won't we get him? We will most likely have one of the top 3 highest odds of getting him. If anything we probably have the best odds of anyone since Sacramento will improve our odds.