Arsenal wrote:sixerswillrule wrote:Arsenal wrote:
Granger only had 1 season of over 25pp36 at over 57% TS%. The rest of his career he was a lesser player. Likely due to injuries, but it is what it is. I expect Tatum to put up more than 1 of that kind of season.
And I'll be disappointed if Tatum finishes with only 16.1 VORP for his entire career like Granger did. It's not like he was good for a decade. He was only good for a few years. Even then he only made 1 all-star game.
Now do you have anything of substance to add to this conversation?
Granger had a period of two seasons where averaged 25 points at 57% TS during that period. That was within a period of 5 seasons where he averaged 22 points on 56% TS. To expect Tatum to do that at all, let alone more than that, is completely unreasonable. Is it possible? Sure. But you're setting yourself up for disappointment by saying things like you expect him to do that or he definitely will do that.
You know what?
I EXPECT him to be better than Granger.
He's BETTER than Granger at the same age and is a MUCH MORE highly touted prospect.
I EXPECT him to be significantly better than 16.1 career VORP.
I EXPECT him to go to more than 1 all-star game.
I couldn't care less if you think that's unreasonable or not.
If only it actually worked that way. Malik Monk is better than Gilbert Arenas at the same age and a much more highly touted prospect but I have yet to hear anyone proclaim Monk will definitely be better than Arenas because that would be nuts.
I also expect Tatum to have a higher career VORP than Granger, just like Matt Barnes and James Posey did. They were still far inferior players, just with longer careers.
If I didn't care about what other people thought about my opionions I wouldn't post on a message board which by default involves hearing other people's thoughts. But that's just me.