Sixersftw wrote:76ciology wrote:The Luka trade has made me question an existing belief I have about evaluating players—how different sports have unique ranking systems based on how they value certain skills. For example, high school basketball feels like a different sport from college basketball, and college basketball is different from the NBA. And the NBA regular season and the NBA playoffs are essentially two different sports.
In the playoffs, durability and endurance should be valued more, while things like drawing fouls become less impactful. We see this with Embiid—he’s one of the most dominant regular-season players, but in the playoffs, his value drops significantly. With Doncic, it’s harder to judge. He’s led his team to the WCF and the Finals, but maybe that series exposed some flaws. Perhaps Dallas sees his conditioning and physique as long-term concerns and decided to sell high before his value declines further.
I think you're looking for a lesson that really isn't exemplified by Dallas' evaluation, actions, or execution. I'm not here to say that your conclusion on what is more valuable during a regular season vs a playoff run is wrong. It may be, IDK. And it may be the driving factor for Dallas' decision, again, I don't know. However, I can't look at them as a rational actor because you can't come to the observation that Luka's conditioning and physique are long term detriments and then in the same breath say that an oft injured, aging, big man is a more sound solution to abating those concerns. That logic just doesn't make sense.
I’m just trying to find an angle—based on some reports—on why the Mavs made this trade, because it’s still mind-blowing. My theory is that Doncic, like prime Harden in Houston, needs to control the offense all game. The problem is, that style doesn’t hold up in the Finals—he’ll eventually run out of gas. No matter how much talent you put around him, even an All-Star team, he’d still want to run the offense, slack off on defense, and then fade by the third or fourth round.
With AD, the approach is different. He doesn’t need to dominate the ball. You just pair him with another big to share the defensive load, catch lobs, attack mismatches, and hit mid-range jumpers. That kind of game is more sustainable deep into the playoffs, and he’ll still have energy left for the Finals.
But yeah, the biggest question is—if the Mavs wanted a star big who can be reliable in the playoffs, why AD? And why just ask for a first round pick to attach to AD? At the very least, ask for Austin Reeves.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.