TTP wrote:APettyJ wrote:TTP wrote:
Yeah unfortunately the voters have historically been terrible. If Saric wins, it will be undeserved.
It's also worth mentioning that as of February 1, Bovada ROTY betting had Brogdon +2000 and Saric +3300.
Nothing to do with "voters being terrible", and everything to do with who has been the most consistent for the entire year. Brogdon has 30 years of experience going against him, and probably for good reason. Dario has the higher scoring average, and is the better defender overall (108 DRTG to Brogdon's 111). This while Brogdon has played more minutes overall.
First, Heild looked like he'd catch Dario. Then it was Murray. Can't see Brogdon winning it while he isn't the scoring leader as well as trailing in two of the three categories.
No, using that criteria is definitely evidence of the voters being terrible. COUNTING STATS!!!!!
Lol @ saying Dario is the better defender overall. Using DRTG is a poor way to measure defense.
Brogdon is probably a plus defender at his position. Dario is a horrendously negative defender. RPM grades him as one of the worst defenders at his position and one of the worst overall PFs.
You also didn't address what I said about the betting lines. That's going to be a much better indication of consensus than anything else.
Like with so any other sports when it comes to handing out awards, it is counting stats rather than advance analysis that rules the day, except in this case the counting stats can provide some insight into what kind of impact a player is having on the all around game.
I pay no attention to fickle betting lines because they change with each gust of wind. If Brogdon goes on into a slump he'll fall like others have. In order to finish with the highest rookie score it require consistent performance over a long stretch of time. This is why Nikola Mirotic lost out to Wiggins two years ago, despite having a better 2015 than Wiggins. In the end it came down to who did it longest.