ImageImageImage

Official Bryan Colangelo thread (for Hinkie talk, use the Hinkie thread)

Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan

Negrodamus
RealGM
Posts: 26,590
And1: 17,173
Joined: Aug 05, 2004

Re: Let's Talk About Bryan & Jerry Colangelo and What to Expect Going Forward 

Post#181 » by Negrodamus » Tue Apr 12, 2016 12:59 am

jcsunsfan wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:
snoopdogg88 wrote:

agreed that they are going to try something drastic. I think Okafor is gone.


If Colangelo's tenure in TOR/PHX is any indication, I'd definitely say Okafor is gone. His bigs are usually mobile and work well in fast breaks: Bosh, Stoudemire, Marion, etc. He even goes small ball with guys like James Johnson.

With that said, I think there will have to be adjustments. Embiid could be a Stoudamire/Bosh type talent, or better. Only time will tell. Nerlens cannot play the Marion role of being a stretch 4 with elite defense. He's only half of that equation. Should be interesting to see what he does with him, especially with his next contract looming.

Covington will probably be here to stay since he definitely fits the mold of undersized PF in that 7 seconds or less offense.

Ben Simmons would be great if he could shoot a lick. The quicker the offense can get initiated, the better. Unfortunately, he can't really shoot or defend (which might not matter anyway if we are going to be one of those teams putting up 130 points a night). I think Ingram might have to be the choice there and maybe trade up for a Valentine with the OKC and Heat picks.

Saric is perfect for this type of offense and, to be honest, Simmons would be a bit redundant with Saric. Not saying Saric is the same prospect, but they are both PFs that can initiate the break. I'm not even thinking in terms of ISOs and halfcourt offense.

The main question, which will probably be hastily decided, is the PG position. Need to pass and pass well. That's why I suggested Rondo earlier. Get him with some shooters on the perimeter and run the P&R with Embiid and there's your offense.

Of course, none of this really gels with Brett Brown's philosophy. I mean, we ran uptempo, but Brown's emphasis is defense and this is the antithesis of defense. Luckily we'll have some depth, presumably, next season so we don't run our players to death.

All of this is under the assumption that Colangelo is going to repeat history and try to implement a D'Antoni scheme. Conveniently, we have D'Antoni on our sidelines! Brown must not feel any job security stress at all.


As a Phoenix Suns fan since 1976 and a Jerry Colangelo fan for years, this post is dead on. I am not as impressed with Bryan. He did OK. Nothing spectacular. He does love international players in the draft it seems.

For those of you who think he will trade Okafor? Yes, I think that is what he would do.
For those of you who think Bryan would love Saric? Yes.
Pass first pg a priority? Yes.

You have it pretty well. Good luck.


Cool, I nailed it. Thanks for your input my man!
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,315
And1: 61,068
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Let's Talk About Bryan & Jerry Colangelo and What to Expect Going Forward 

Post#182 » by bwgood77 » Tue Apr 12, 2016 1:23 am

jcsunsfan wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:
snoopdogg88 wrote:

agreed that they are going to try something drastic. I think Okafor is gone.


If Colangelo's tenure in TOR/PHX is any indication, I'd definitely say Okafor is gone. His bigs are usually mobile and work well in fast breaks: Bosh, Stoudemire, Marion, etc. He even goes small ball with guys like James Johnson.

With that said, I think there will have to be adjustments. Embiid could be a Stoudamire/Bosh type talent, or better. Only time will tell. Nerlens cannot play the Marion role of being a stretch 4 with elite defense. He's only half of that equation. Should be interesting to see what he does with him, especially with his next contract looming.

Covington will probably be here to stay since he definitely fits the mold of undersized PF in that 7 seconds or less offense.

Ben Simmons would be great if he could shoot a lick. The quicker the offense can get initiated, the better. Unfortunately, he can't really shoot or defend (which might not matter anyway if we are going to be one of those teams putting up 130 points a night). I think Ingram might have to be the choice there and maybe trade up for a Valentine with the OKC and Heat picks.

Saric is perfect for this type of offense and, to be honest, Simmons would be a bit redundant with Saric. Not saying Saric is the same prospect, but they are both PFs that can initiate the break. I'm not even thinking in terms of ISOs and halfcourt offense.

The main question, which will probably be hastily decided, is the PG position. Need to pass and pass well. That's why I suggested Rondo earlier. Get him with some shooters on the perimeter and run the P&R with Embiid and there's your offense.

Of course, none of this really gels with Brett Brown's philosophy. I mean, we ran uptempo, but Brown's emphasis is defense and this is the antithesis of defense. Luckily we'll have some depth, presumably, next season so we don't run our players to death.

All of this is under the assumption that Colangelo is going to repeat history and try to implement a D'Antoni scheme. Conveniently, we have D'Antoni on our sidelines! Brown must not feel any job security stress at all.


As a Phoenix Suns fan since 1976 and a Jerry Colangelo fan for years, this post is dead on. I am not as impressed with Bryan. He did OK. Nothing spectacular. He does love international players in the draft it seems.

For those of you who think he will trade Okafor? Yes, I think that is what he would do.
For those of you who think Bryan would love Saric? Yes.
Pass first pg a priority? Yes.

You have it pretty well. Good luck.


Yes, JC(Jerry Colangelo)Suns fan has it right. I can understand how Philly fans can feel like he is a snake (but the owner probably brought him in at least to somewhat marginalize Hinkie), and wanting his son as they guy is obviously questionable and should be challenged to some extent, but he did want him as GM as the Suns when he owned them and the guy grew up right around basketball and the NBA from day one.

But I am pretty sure he will emphasize a pass first PG. The Suns had KJ and Nash during their glory years and Kidd for a good stretch. He knows that is important.

Jerry always wanted the team to be competitive. Back in the day there was less of a mentality of "if you can win a championship, it's worthless to be competitive and be a good fun playoff team". I'm kind of still in that mentality, since championships are so hard to come by....even if you have a top 5 player, you still only have a 1 in 5 or 6 chance at winning then....and I watch for entertainment.

The Suns from 88-95 and 04-10 were some of my best years as a sports fan. As an AZ cats fan, they won one championship in 97, which was awesome, but sucked for quite a few years post Lute Olson pre Sean Miller. I would take a fun to watch competitive playoff team that made some deep runs but never won it all, over a franchise that won it all once and sucked for 5 years any day.

I guess what I am trying to say is that those superstars that redefine a franchise MAYBE come around once every 2-3 years at the top of the draft (AD, KAT in the last 5 years...go back 6 if you don't consider Wall franchise changing), and maybe some others who were taken later in the draft break out (Kawhi, Draymond, Marc Gasol). So in the former case...two guys in five or six years, where, even if you had the worst record, you STILL only have a 25% chance of hitting...there are so many other crappy guys at the top of the drafts if you look back, that nothing is a given if you draft high. I can't say I think the top of this draft if franchise defining either, but it does seem like a pretty bid drop off after two.

I am really interested to see what Colangelo does. I don't know that he will rush too much, but he will make moves, and will try to sign some free agents. I think you have enough assets at this point, that building a cohesive team is what needs to happen. I know Colangelo has done pretty well (SSOL team) and fairly bad (Toronto, although the cornerstones of their team there now were guys he brought in or drafted). But there is no evidence at all that Hinkie could build a cohesive team. And I don't know for sure if he had communication issues...I read it everywhere except for these forums, but if he does, that is a problem...take it from me...as a Suns fan I am dealing with McDonough being terrible with communication causing bad situations. Colangelo doesn't have that problem.

OK, long post, and at this point I'm not even entirely sure what my point is, but BC will likely try and make the team as competitive as possible for as long as possible, but he won't sacrifice developing good young prospects to do that either....Amare played a lot immediately, and he was a 9th pick, and Marion picked around the same area played quite a bit immediately...same with Nash, drafted 15th, despite having KJ and Kidd on the roster.
spikeslovechild
RealGM
Posts: 12,843
And1: 6,198
Joined: Dec 16, 2013
Location: Right here waiting for you

Re: Let's Talk About Bryan & Jerry Colangelo and What to Expect Going Forward 

Post#183 » by spikeslovechild » Tue Apr 12, 2016 1:44 am

bwgood77 wrote:
howiezbt wrote:Hield can kill it from deep. I would take him at 3 and Dunn at 4. Either way we are getting huge talent on the perimiter. Also, a players is going to shoot up draft boards so we may have another guy to talk about.


That could have the makings of a dynamic fun backcourt. Some Suns fans would LOVE that...many want us to end up with Hield or Dunn even if Bender is available.

I suppose some want Brown too, and I forgot to mention him as a possibility if you drop to 3. Murray is probably the prospect least liked by Suns fans...probably because he seems like a SG they want to turn into a PG, and we already have to live with the Knightmare...plus we already have 4 one year Kentucky guards. Enough is enough. Hield seems more like a pure 2 and Dunn a pure 1 (but Hield will still get teammates involved and Dunn can score as well).


For the sixers it works out well because they maybe able to get one of your guards at a discounted rate if that happens.

For the Suns and their fans I don't get it at all. You have Booker, Bledsoe, Knight, and Goodwin. I'm a big believer in BPA but Bender is the BPA and actually fills a position of need of the Suns.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,315
And1: 61,068
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Let's Talk About Bryan & Jerry Colangelo and What to Expect Going Forward 

Post#184 » by bwgood77 » Tue Apr 12, 2016 3:14 am

spikeslovechild wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
howiezbt wrote:Hield can kill it from deep. I would take him at 3 and Dunn at 4. Either way we are getting huge talent on the perimiter. Also, a players is going to shoot up draft boards so we may have another guy to talk about.


That could have the makings of a dynamic fun backcourt. Some Suns fans would LOVE that...many want us to end up with Hield or Dunn even if Bender is available.

I suppose some want Brown too, and I forgot to mention him as a possibility if you drop to 3. Murray is probably the prospect least liked by Suns fans...probably because he seems like a SG they want to turn into a PG, and we already have to live with the Knightmare...plus we already have 4 one year Kentucky guards. Enough is enough. Hield seems more like a pure 2 and Dunn a pure 1 (but Hield will still get teammates involved and Dunn can score as well).


For the sixers it works out well because they maybe able to get one of your guards at a discounted rate if that happens.

For the Suns and their fans I don't get it at all. You have Booker, Bledsoe, Knight, and Goodwin. I'm a big believer in BPA but Bender is the BPA and actually fills a position of need of the Suns.


Oh, believe me, I want Bender if he is available, but we can fall anywhere between 1 and 7. Our most likely spot is 5. I'm just not sure if teams would pass on Bender for that long. Boston fans say they would take him at 3....doesn't make a ton of sense them because they are competitive and he is raw, but they do have a lot of guards (though IT only under contract for one more year). Seems like Hield would be good for them, or maybe Brown. In an earlier poll, Suns fans chose Bender mostly, second most was Brown, and then it was scattered after that, but after all those votes came in, I switched the poll to Washington pick...leader there is Sabonis. I may change it or add a new poll for our first pick as well.
Ericb5
RealGM
Posts: 10,303
And1: 3,377
Joined: Jan 08, 2014
       

Re: Let's Talk About Bryan & Jerry Colangelo and What to Expect Going Forward 

Post#185 » by Ericb5 » Tue Apr 12, 2016 4:03 am

I don't know the psychology of Bryan Colangelo, but what I fear is that he will try to get good by overpaying non stars before we have our stars/core.

I am a big believer in keeping your powder dry until you have your core. Now, if Embiid continues to do really well this summer, and we get one of the top two picks, then MAYBE you could lower the threshold a BIT in terms of the types of players that you could offer big money to.

Turning this team into a 45-50 win team should be easy by just spending money, and not being totally reckless with our assets. Not next year, but in 2-3 years.

The thing is that I want more than that. I want to be a true contender, and even a team like the current Toronto team is not a real contender.

You need at least one player on your team that is capable of winning an MVP award to really have a shot. Other than Detroit in 04, every other team that I can think of that won the title had one.

I know that Hinkie knows that, and would not let us lose our flexibility until he found at least one player of that caliber. Embiid could be that guy, but he has the health issues. Simmons could be that guy, but we would need to win the lottery for that. Even if those two things happen this summer, it is STILL too early to spend a lot of free agent money, unless it was for Durant who obviously isn't coming.

Bryan spent lots of money in Toronto trying to make a team with no chance good enough for him to keep his job. Can he resist doing the same thing here?


Sent from my iPad using RealGM Forums
dorkestra
RealGM
Posts: 10,387
And1: 12,675
Joined: Mar 03, 2013

Re: Let's Talk About Bryan & Jerry Colangelo and What to Expect Going Forward 

Post#186 » by dorkestra » Tue Apr 12, 2016 10:29 am

I wonder if he still has a boner for Rudy Gay. The Kings could get revenge on us from last summer's trade by tricking BC into getting Gay again.
PhilasFinest
RealGM
Posts: 14,640
And1: 3,581
Joined: Mar 13, 2007
     

Re: Let's Talk About Bryan & Jerry Colangelo and What to Expect Going Forward 

Post#187 » by PhilasFinest » Tue Apr 12, 2016 12:44 pm

dorkestra wrote:I wonder if he still has a boner for Rudy Gay. The Kings could get revenge on us from last summer's trade by tricking BC into getting Gay again.


I personally feel like he will go after someone like Harrison Barnes. Gay will be 30 this year and is what he is. Unless its some type of throw away from Sacramento I don't expect it.
SparksFly87 wrote:Towns got boat feet and gets off the ground very slow with a lack of explosiveness . He is a rich mans Henry Sims to me. No thanks .
Negrodamus
RealGM
Posts: 26,590
And1: 17,173
Joined: Aug 05, 2004

Re: Let's Talk About Bryan & Jerry Colangelo and What to Expect Going Forward 

Post#188 » by Negrodamus » Tue Apr 12, 2016 12:54 pm

PhilasFinest wrote:
dorkestra wrote:I wonder if he still has a boner for Rudy Gay. The Kings could get revenge on us from last summer's trade by tricking BC into getting Gay again.


I personally feel like he will go after someone like Harrison Barnes. Gay will be 30 this year and is what he is. Unless its some type of throw away from Sacramento I don't expect it.


I think Harrison Barnes is another Rudy Gay. Has all the talent and size in the world but can't put it together on a successful team as "the guy". He never impressed me at UNC when he showed no growth in his second year. Whenever I watch him play, he gets by on talent but is completely passive.

All that said, yea, we'll probably throw him the max.
Negrodamus
RealGM
Posts: 26,590
And1: 17,173
Joined: Aug 05, 2004

Re: Let's Talk About Bryan & Jerry Colangelo and What to Expect Going Forward 

Post#189 » by Negrodamus » Tue Apr 12, 2016 3:01 pm

Alright, I know I've made some predictions over the past few days, but after mulling it over, here's what I think pre-lottery with the assumption that we get the #1 pick but not the Lakers pick.

We draft Ben Simmons #1 with the intention of playing him SF but also PF at times. He will essentially be serving as our point forward. I think Colangelo is still interested in running uptempo and wants to be innovative in a way. I don't blame this approach. 7 seconds or less offense is probably run better from the second the ball is rebounded. What better way than to have your best rebounder as your point guard?

One of our first rounders will be traded for something, I just don't know what. I can't image Colangelo brings in 3 rookies with guaranteed contracts. With one of those picks, I'm going to guess we draft Jaron Blossomgame SF from Clemson. Very athletic, runs the floor well, hits spot up 3s, plays great defense, is a transition offense kind of guy.

In free agency, we throw the max at Bradley Beal which the Wizards will probably match. I could see us offering a large contract to Eric Gordon as a backup plan. If the true plan is to have Simmons be our LeBron James and run the team, our PG will likely be a shooter. Possibly a DJ Augustin, maybe an Aaron Brooks. If he really wanted to be progressive, he could have Beal/Gordon be the PG in name (as in guard the opposing PG) and bring in Batum/Barnes at SG.

The Okafor trade, which I think is inevitable, is too hard for me to pinpoint. I honestly cannot figure out who he'd be interested in. But the above would give us, worse case scenario:

PG - Gordon
SG- I guess Okafor trade? I don't know.
SF- Simmons
PF- Saric
C- Noel

As stated by many of you, Embiid will be on a minute restriction. Noel will be our starting center next year and will play quite well.

I think Colangelo wants his LeBron James and will go all in on a Simmons. For better or worse, I don't think he is willing to do the same with Ingram.

For the record, this is not how I'd do it, but my tentative prediction before the lottery. I could still get excited about that team though.
Sixercise
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,910
And1: 493
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
     

Re: Let's Talk About Bryan & Jerry Colangelo and What to Expect Going Forward 

Post#190 » by Sixercise » Tue Apr 12, 2016 3:39 pm

If BC can nab someone like a Wall or jimmy buckets, I can get behind the organization's plan. Those players imo are examples that can be key components to building a contender AND fix our backcourt wormhole.
rilamann wrote:Leave Simmons alone, your back would be sore too if you didn't have a spine.
Ericb5
RealGM
Posts: 10,303
And1: 3,377
Joined: Jan 08, 2014
       

Re: Let's Talk About Bryan & Jerry Colangelo and What to Expect Going Forward 

Post#191 » by Ericb5 » Tue Apr 12, 2016 4:43 pm

Negrodamus wrote:Alright, I know I've made some predictions over the past few days, but after mulling it over, here's what I think pre-lottery with the assumption that we get the #1 pick but not the Lakers pick.

We draft Ben Simmons #1 with the intention of playing him SF but also PF at times. He will essentially be serving as our point forward. I think Colangelo is still interested in running uptempo and wants to be innovative in a way. I don't blame this approach. 7 seconds or less offense is probably run better from the second the ball is rebounded. What better way than to have your best rebounder as your point guard?

One of our first rounders will be traded for something, I just don't know what. I can't image Colangelo brings in 3 rookies with guaranteed contracts. With one of those picks, I'm going to guess we draft Jaron Blossomgame SF from Clemson. Very athletic, runs the floor well, hits spot up 3s, plays great defense, is a transition offense kind of guy.

In free agency, we throw the max at Bradley Beal which the Wizards will probably match. I could see us offering a large contract to Eric Gordon as a backup plan. If the true plan is to have Simmons be our LeBron James and run the team, our PG will likely be a shooter. Possibly a DJ Augustin, maybe an Aaron Brooks. If he really wanted to be progressive, he could have Beal/Gordon be the PG in name (as in guard the opposing PG) and bring in Batum/Barnes at SG.

The Okafor trade, which I think is inevitable, is too hard for me to pinpoint. I honestly cannot figure out who he'd be interested in. But the above would give us, worse case scenario:

PG - Gordon
SG- I guess Okafor trade? I don't know.
SF- Simmons
PF- Saric
C- Noel

As stated by many of you, Embiid will be on a minute restriction. Noel will be our starting center next year and will play quite well.

I think Colangelo wants his LeBron James and will go all in on a Simmons. For better or worse, I don't think he is willing to do the same with Ingram.

For the record, this is not how I'd do it, but my tentative prediction before the lottery. I could still get excited about that team though.



If we offer a big contract to Eric Gordon then Bryan is a complete fool.

I mean 4 years 30 million is one thing, but 4 years 80 million is a pass for me.

Gordon has no upside whatsoever. He is a talented non star player that is always injured. If we are going to bring in an often injured player then Beal could work because he is a notch or two better than Gordon. He is a legitimate Allstar type of talent.

Throwing money at Gordon is exactly the kind of move that I'm afraid of. He is not a difference maker.

The only players that we should break our oath of sensibility on are players that are, or could become, stars.

I'm not against signing legitimate NBA veterans, but not at any significant cost, unless they are needle movers.




Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Negrodamus
RealGM
Posts: 26,590
And1: 17,173
Joined: Aug 05, 2004

Re: Let's Talk About Bryan & Jerry Colangelo and What to Expect Going Forward 

Post#192 » by Negrodamus » Tue Apr 12, 2016 4:59 pm

Ericb5 wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:Alright, I know I've made some predictions over the past few days, but after mulling it over, here's what I think pre-lottery with the assumption that we get the #1 pick but not the Lakers pick.

We draft Ben Simmons #1 with the intention of playing him SF but also PF at times. He will essentially be serving as our point forward. I think Colangelo is still interested in running uptempo and wants to be innovative in a way. I don't blame this approach. 7 seconds or less offense is probably run better from the second the ball is rebounded. What better way than to have your best rebounder as your point guard?

One of our first rounders will be traded for something, I just don't know what. I can't image Colangelo brings in 3 rookies with guaranteed contracts. With one of those picks, I'm going to guess we draft Jaron Blossomgame SF from Clemson. Very athletic, runs the floor well, hits spot up 3s, plays great defense, is a transition offense kind of guy.

In free agency, we throw the max at Bradley Beal which the Wizards will probably match. I could see us offering a large contract to Eric Gordon as a backup plan. If the true plan is to have Simmons be our LeBron James and run the team, our PG will likely be a shooter. Possibly a DJ Augustin, maybe an Aaron Brooks. If he really wanted to be progressive, he could have Beal/Gordon be the PG in name (as in guard the opposing PG) and bring in Batum/Barnes at SG.

The Okafor trade, which I think is inevitable, is too hard for me to pinpoint. I honestly cannot figure out who he'd be interested in. But the above would give us, worse case scenario:

PG - Gordon
SG- I guess Okafor trade? I don't know.
SF- Simmons
PF- Saric
C- Noel

As stated by many of you, Embiid will be on a minute restriction. Noel will be our starting center next year and will play quite well.

I think Colangelo wants his LeBron James and will go all in on a Simmons. For better or worse, I don't think he is willing to do the same with Ingram.

For the record, this is not how I'd do it, but my tentative prediction before the lottery. I could still get excited about that team though.



If we offer a big contract to Eric Gordon then Bryan is a complete fool.

I mean 4 years 30 million is one thing, but 4 years 80 million is a pass for me.

Gordon has no upside whatsoever. He is a talented non star player that is always injured. If we are going to bring in an often injured player then Beal could work because he is a notch or two better than Gordon. He is a legitimate Allstar type of talent.

Throwing money at Gordon is exactly the kind of move that I'm afraid of. He is not a difference maker.

The only players that we should break our oath of sensibility on are players that are, or could become, stars.

I'm not against signing legitimate NBA veterans, but not at any significant cost, unless they are needle movers.




Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


For sure, but I'm looking at the Free Agent list and the type of moves Colangelo has made with the Suns/Raptors. Brad Beal isn't available? Oh well, on to the next SG. I desperately don't want Gordon on this team, but he's the "just good enough" player that is somewhat young that would be overvalued.

Frankly, I'd be OK with the above situation if we did the Okafor + LAL pick for Booker and Knight. I'm not crazy about the value going out in comparison to the value going in, but it would make a nice fit with Simmons running the show. At the end of the day, that team isn't playing a lick of defense and we are scoring 130 ppg. I just don't really care anymore about how I had perceived this team. I felt like I had the Hinkie idea somewhat figured out, but now we have this insane future ahead of us.

If there's one thing I know, it's that Colangelo will select Simmons if he gets the first pick. He's not going to let recent events affect Simmons's value; he's learned his lesson from Drummond. If we're being honest with ourselves, Simmons is the best transition offense player in this draft. Colangelo is probably eating up that hype. I don't hate a Simmons pick at all, but I'm definitely team Ingram.

I have a philosophically different approach than what Colangelo's track record suggests, but I'm still willing to get excited about this team.
Ericb5
RealGM
Posts: 10,303
And1: 3,377
Joined: Jan 08, 2014
       

Re: Let's Talk About Bryan & Jerry Colangelo and What to Expect Going Forward 

Post#193 » by Ericb5 » Tue Apr 12, 2016 5:20 pm

Negrodamus wrote:
Ericb5 wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:Alright, I know I've made some predictions over the past few days, but after mulling it over, here's what I think pre-lottery with the assumption that we get the #1 pick but not the Lakers pick.

We draft Ben Simmons #1 with the intention of playing him SF but also PF at times. He will essentially be serving as our point forward. I think Colangelo is still interested in running uptempo and wants to be innovative in a way. I don't blame this approach. 7 seconds or less offense is probably run better from the second the ball is rebounded. What better way than to have your best rebounder as your point guard?

One of our first rounders will be traded for something, I just don't know what. I can't image Colangelo brings in 3 rookies with guaranteed contracts. With one of those picks, I'm going to guess we draft Jaron Blossomgame SF from Clemson. Very athletic, runs the floor well, hits spot up 3s, plays great defense, is a transition offense kind of guy.

In free agency, we throw the max at Bradley Beal which the Wizards will probably match. I could see us offering a large contract to Eric Gordon as a backup plan. If the true plan is to have Simmons be our LeBron James and run the team, our PG will likely be a shooter. Possibly a DJ Augustin, maybe an Aaron Brooks. If he really wanted to be progressive, he could have Beal/Gordon be the PG in name (as in guard the opposing PG) and bring in Batum/Barnes at SG.

The Okafor trade, which I think is inevitable, is too hard for me to pinpoint. I honestly cannot figure out who he'd be interested in. But the above would give us, worse case scenario:

PG - Gordon
SG- I guess Okafor trade? I don't know.
SF- Simmons
PF- Saric
C- Noel

As stated by many of you, Embiid will be on a minute restriction. Noel will be our starting center next year and will play quite well.

I think Colangelo wants his LeBron James and will go all in on a Simmons. For better or worse, I don't think he is willing to do the same with Ingram.

For the record, this is not how I'd do it, but my tentative prediction before the lottery. I could still get excited about that team though.



If we offer a big contract to Eric Gordon then Bryan is a complete fool.

I mean 4 years 30 million is one thing, but 4 years 80 million is a pass for me.

Gordon has no upside whatsoever. He is a talented non star player that is always injured. If we are going to bring in an often injured player then Beal could work because he is a notch or two better than Gordon. He is a legitimate Allstar type of talent.

Throwing money at Gordon is exactly the kind of move that I'm afraid of. He is not a difference maker.

The only players that we should break our oath of sensibility on are players that are, or could become, stars.

I'm not against signing legitimate NBA veterans, but not at any significant cost, unless they are needle movers.




Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


For sure, but I'm looking at the Free Agent list and the type of moves Colangelo has made with the Suns/Raptors. Brad Beal isn't available? Oh well, on to the next SG. I desperately don't want Gordon on this team, but he's the "just good enough" player that is somewhat young that would be overvalued.

Frankly, I'd be OK with the above situation if we did the Okafor + LAL pick for Booker and Knight. I'm not crazy about the value going out in comparison to the value going in, but it would make a nice fit with Simmons running the show. At the end of the day, that team isn't playing a lick of defense and we are scoring 130 ppg. I just don't really care anymore about how I had perceived this team. I felt like I had the Hinkie idea somewhat figured out, but now we have this insane future ahead of us.

If there's one thing I know, it's that Colangelo will select Simmons if he gets the first pick. He's not going to let recent events affect Simmons's value; he's learned his lesson from Drummond. If we're being honest with ourselves, Simmons is the best transition offense player in this draft. Colangelo is probably eating up that hype. I don't hate a Simmons pick at all, but I'm definitely team Ingram.

I have a philosophically different approach than what Colangelo's track record suggests, but I'm still willing to get excited about this team.


Gordon isn't a bad player. If he was consistently healthy then I wouldn't be so against signing him, but he is very fragile, and has no upside so I definitely don't want to pay market value for him.

The only way that I would want Knight on this team is if we get Simmons. If Knight is expected to run the team then we will be in trouble.

I'm not sure why the Suns would want Okafor OR he Lakers pick. I mean they were the ones that traded US that pick, and how is Okafor going to play next to Len?






Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Negrodamus
RealGM
Posts: 26,590
And1: 17,173
Joined: Aug 05, 2004

Re: Let's Talk About Bryan & Jerry Colangelo and What to Expect Going Forward 

Post#194 » by Negrodamus » Tue Apr 12, 2016 5:33 pm

Ericb5 wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:
Ericb5 wrote:

If we offer a big contract to Eric Gordon then Bryan is a complete fool.

I mean 4 years 30 million is one thing, but 4 years 80 million is a pass for me.

Gordon has no upside whatsoever. He is a talented non star player that is always injured. If we are going to bring in an often injured player then Beal could work because he is a notch or two better than Gordon. He is a legitimate Allstar type of talent.

Throwing money at Gordon is exactly the kind of move that I'm afraid of. He is not a difference maker.

The only players that we should break our oath of sensibility on are players that are, or could become, stars.

I'm not against signing legitimate NBA veterans, but not at any significant cost, unless they are needle movers.




Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


For sure, but I'm looking at the Free Agent list and the type of moves Colangelo has made with the Suns/Raptors. Brad Beal isn't available? Oh well, on to the next SG. I desperately don't want Gordon on this team, but he's the "just good enough" player that is somewhat young that would be overvalued.

Frankly, I'd be OK with the above situation if we did the Okafor + LAL pick for Booker and Knight. I'm not crazy about the value going out in comparison to the value going in, but it would make a nice fit with Simmons running the show. At the end of the day, that team isn't playing a lick of defense and we are scoring 130 ppg. I just don't really care anymore about how I had perceived this team. I felt like I had the Hinkie idea somewhat figured out, but now we have this insane future ahead of us.

If there's one thing I know, it's that Colangelo will select Simmons if he gets the first pick. He's not going to let recent events affect Simmons's value; he's learned his lesson from Drummond. If we're being honest with ourselves, Simmons is the best transition offense player in this draft. Colangelo is probably eating up that hype. I don't hate a Simmons pick at all, but I'm definitely team Ingram.

I have a philosophically different approach than what Colangelo's track record suggests, but I'm still willing to get excited about this team.


Gordon isn't a bad player. If he was consistently healthy then I wouldn't be so against signing him, but he is very fragile, and has no upside so I definitely don't want to pay market value for him.

The only way that I would want Knight on this team is if we get Simmons. If Knight is expected to run the team then we will be in trouble.

I'm not sure why the Suns would want Okafor OR he Lakers pick. I mean they were the ones that traded US that pick, and how is Okafor going to play next to Len?

Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


Because Okafor is simply better than Len. He's proven to be one of the best offensive bigs in the NBA in just this one season. He would work in Phoenix.

And now they are realizing what Knight is, or what he's not, and would like a bit of a bailout. Not saying Knight is bad, but he just cannot be the main ball handler on that team.

The perception was that the Lakers would have a massive offseason last year and the LAL pick wouldn't be worth that much. The same situation could happen this offseason, but I don't see a real reason for Durant, or any relevant FA for that matter, to be interested in playing in LA. That pick will likely convey next year (unless we luck into it this year, in which the trade is even more alluring for them) and they'll get a stud.
User avatar
ET Da Gawd
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,786
And1: 367
Joined: May 15, 2012
Location: Goa Kingdom
       

Re: Let's Talk About Bryan & Jerry Colangelo and What to Expect Going Forward 

Post#196 » by ET Da Gawd » Tue Apr 12, 2016 6:27 pm

This is laughable looking at these suggestions, idk what type of team y'all wanna build


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
LongLiveHinkie
RealGM
Posts: 14,263
And1: 3,963
Joined: May 04, 2005

Re: Let's Talk About Bryan & Jerry Colangelo and What to Expect Going Forward 

Post#197 » by LongLiveHinkie » Tue Apr 12, 2016 6:32 pm

Not sure the Sixers will target Barnes. If the Sixers get a top 2 pick, they will get Simmons or Ingram... both 3's. Barnes is a 3. Unless he thinks one of them can play 2 guard, which I don't get why he would think that, I don't see it. I think Derozan is more likely, or maybe overpaying for a Mike Conley.
User avatar
51X3RF4N
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,159
And1: 935
Joined: Feb 14, 2008
       

Re: Let's Talk About Bryan & Jerry Colangelo and What to Expect Going Forward 

Post#198 » by 51X3RF4N » Tue Apr 12, 2016 8:03 pm

DeRozen seems like such a clear cut, predictable move. And honestly, I'm kind of warming up to the idea. As long as Ingram is the SF next to him, and you get a PG who can make a shot once in a while, it could end up being pretty nice. Although, now that I've said that, it is likely it won't happen.
Your Future Sixers

C- Embiid/?
PF- ?/?
SF- ?/?
SG- ?/?
PG- ?/?
Negrodamus
RealGM
Posts: 26,590
And1: 17,173
Joined: Aug 05, 2004

Re: Let's Talk About Bryan & Jerry Colangelo and What to Expect Going Forward 

Post#199 » by Negrodamus » Tue Apr 12, 2016 8:18 pm

ET Da Gawd wrote:This is laughable looking at these suggestions, idk what type of team y'all wanna build


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


You're getting it twisted. It's the team that is expected, not the team I want to build. Colangelo is not going to turn this into the Hinkie Sixers we were expecting.
User avatar
KobeBryant24
Veteran
Posts: 2,514
And1: 2,167
Joined: Aug 06, 2014
Location: Savannah, GA
     

Re: Let's Talk About Bryan & Jerry Colangelo and What to Expect Going Forward 

Post#200 » by KobeBryant24 » Tue Apr 12, 2016 8:27 pm

Edit

Return to Philadelphia 76ers