Negrodamus wrote:I think that's what the Bulls as a whole are right now, a bunch of solid rotation players.
We can take 1 off there hands for hometown hero Big Jah!
Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan
Negrodamus wrote:I think that's what the Bulls as a whole are right now, a bunch of solid rotation players.
SparksFly87 wrote:Towns got boat feet and gets off the ground very slow with a lack of explosiveness . He is a rich mans Henry Sims to me. No thanks .
Kobblehead wrote:The Lakers are heading to Boston on Wednesday.
Who would you rather have between Brandon Ingram and Jaylen Brown?
Ummmm... Injured shoulder... Didn't forget how to shoot... Also wonder when you stop repeating yourselfUnbreakable99 wrote:Tatum is out here winning games for the Celtics in crunch time and was 3-5 from 3 lol. Keep balling out young man and show BC how dumb he was to trade up. People said he couldn’t shoot 3s and didn’t have the range. I thought his shooting was real. He might shoot over 50% from 3 this year. Tatum is playing great while Fultz forgot how to shoot. Great job BC. Big dummy.
spikeslovechild wrote:Big Ballers don't pay, when a big baller sees something he wants he just takes it.
http://news.abs-cbn.com/sports/11/08/17/reports-brother-of-lakers-lonzo-ball-among-3-arrested-in-china
LongLiveHinkie wrote:What should be more illegal, stealing in China or Lonzo Ball's shooting form?
eagereyez wrote:LongLiveHinkie wrote:What should be more illegal, stealing in China or Lonzo Ball's shooting form?
My vote goes to trading up for a PG who forgot how to shoot.
Unbreakable99 wrote:About a year ago some posters thought Embiid and Porzingis could not coexist and some said Porzingis’ best position is center. Do people still think Embiid and Porzingis couldn’t coexist? I think they could mesh VERY well together. And adding Simmons to the mix would have given us the longest team in the league and 3 unicorns on the same squad. Embiid would be the center. Porzingis would be the PF. Simmons would be the PG. How can that not work?
SparksFly87 wrote:Towns got boat feet and gets off the ground very slow with a lack of explosiveness . He is a rich mans Henry Sims to me. No thanks .
PhilasFinest wrote:Unbreakable99 wrote:About a year ago some posters thought Embiid and Porzingis could not coexist and some said Porzingis’ best position is center. Do people still think Embiid and Porzingis couldn’t coexist? I think they could mesh VERY well together. And adding Simmons to the mix would have given us the longest team in the league and 3 unicorns on the same squad. Embiid would be the center. Porzingis would be the PF. Simmons would be the PG. How can that not work?
1. It could absolutely work, unless your playing GSW.
2.Why does this continue to be a debate? If we are going back into time and taking Porzingis, getting Simmons is not a lock.
Unbreakable99 wrote:PhilasFinest wrote:Unbreakable99 wrote:About a year ago some posters thought Embiid and Porzingis could not coexist and some said Porzingis’ best position is center. Do people still think Embiid and Porzingis couldn’t coexist? I think they could mesh VERY well together. And adding Simmons to the mix would have given us the longest team in the league and 3 unicorns on the same squad. Embiid would be the center. Porzingis would be the PF. Simmons would be the PG. How can that not work?
1. It could absolutely work, unless your playing GSW.
2.Why does this continue to be a debate? If we are going back into time and taking Porzingis, getting Simmons is not a lock.
It is a lock we get Simmons. We won 10 games. The next worst team won 18. Porzingis was not winning us 8 or 9 more games.
SparksFly87 wrote:Towns got boat feet and gets off the ground very slow with a lack of explosiveness . He is a rich mans Henry Sims to me. No thanks .
PhilasFinest wrote:Unbreakable99 wrote:PhilasFinest wrote:
1. It could absolutely work, unless your playing GSW.
2.Why does this continue to be a debate? If we are going back into time and taking Porzingis, getting Simmons is not a lock.
It is a lock we get Simmons. We won 10 games. The next worst team won 18. Porzingis was not winning us 8 or 9 more games.
Your going back in time and taking a better player but negating any other possibilities that could have effected landing the #1 pick. Porzingis could have possibly won us 8 or 9 games....Hinkie could have not been fired for landing The Zinger, so the NBA may have not gifted us the #1 pick for that and the Lakers end up with Simmons. Embiid might have not gotten hurt a 2nd time. The world may have ended.
Kobblehead wrote:There aren't many examples of powerful athletes like Jaylen Brown being able to be 40% three point shooters.
If that shot is real (I'm skeptical), I have to give the edge to him.
Appostis wrote:You're friend ..is a idiot.