tk76 wrote:Still can't see how adding Kaman is good for this team long term. Lets look at the range of possiblilities:
1. Kaman has a career year under collins. The team wins 46 games and has a competetive 1st round series. Then due to this "success" they re-sign a 30 year old Kaman to a 5 years deal.
2. Kaman is injury plagued and leaves as an expiring. The Sixers win 40 games. He is gone as a FA.
3. Kaman plays OK. Team wins 44 games. knocked out in 5-6 games. They eitehr resign Kaman or he walks.
...So how do any of thee scenarios actulally help the Sixers in 2-3 years when Brand is gone and Jrue/Turner are in their prime? The only thing Ic an imagine is if they flip Kaman at the deadline in part of a bigger deal. But Siince the Sxiers never trade away expirings, I'm not seeing that as likely.
So exactly how does adding Kaman help beyond next year? And if adding Kaman means they are less likely to address their big man future issues in the draft, doesn't that actually hurt them?
Scenario with Iguodala.
- 1st round exit till 2013. After that when EB42's contract expire, we're left with a less promising squad that is in limbo between the lotto and the play-offs.
Scenario with Ellis:
- See Iguodala scenario
Scenario with Kaman:
- compete for 2011-2012. Youth movement in 2012-2013, with Jrue-ET-Aminu-EB42-Donatas or Vucevic. Huge cap space in 2013.
Advantage? No drop off in competitiveness next season. A brighter future with Aminu, potential lotto pick and capspace in 2013. But even without the lotto pick, say we made the playoffs with an improved Aminu and Vucevic/Donatas, the future is still a lot brighter with that cap space.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.