RealGM 2017 Fan Forum Mock Draft - PHI #3

[DoItALL9]

No, I don't. A one dimensional shooter is not a top 10 pick IMO. Aim higher.

Devin Booker had a similar scouting report from many a couple years ago.

If Monk was 6'6" I think he'd be a bit higher regarded.

A next Bradley Beal?

[Kobblehead]

A next Bradley Beal?

If he magically gains a handle and slashing ability.

[PhilasFinest]

Devin Booker had a similar scouting report from many a couple years ago.

If Monk was 6'6" I think he'd be a bit higher regarded.

A next Bradley Beal?

Bradley Beal is a hair under 6'5" but has more length (think he has a 6'8 or 6'9" wingspan) which helps on D.

I haven't seen combine #'s for Monk yet....but his last listed measurements was 6'3" with a 6'3" wingspan on UK's website (which tends to stretch things.) Not sold he is almost 200LBS.

Monk could certainly be a big time shot maker in the league and a problem in transition. Im just not sure he will be able to do much defending in the NBA and will be more like a Monta Ellis.(who's got similar measurements)

[the_process]

You don't think Monk should be a top ten pick?

No, I don't. A one dimensional shooter is not a top 10 pick IMO. Aim higher.

Devin Booker had a similar scouting report from many a couple years ago.

Booker had a handle and was 6'6". And Booker was the 13th pick.

[LloydFree]

Devin Booker had a similar scouting report from many a couple years ago.

If Monk was 6'6" I think he'd be a bit higher regarded.

A next Bradley Beal?

Naawww. Bradley Beal is what Boston better hope Fultz can be.

[seankbell]

I think monk is a lottery pick but isn't worth the #3 pick

[JMac1]

Anything worth going to read?

I have no posts/threads specifically noted. Just comments I've read in passing. There's a contingency on each the Celtics, Lakers and Suns boards that acknowledge Jackson as the best player in this draft and are annoyed about us potentially having Embiid, Simmons and him together, going forward.