ImageImageImage

Celtics @ Sixers 7 pm ET

Moderators: BullyKing, HartfordWhalers, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan

Sixerscan
Senior Mod - 76ers
Senior Mod - 76ers
Posts: 33,946
And1: 16,328
Joined: Jan 25, 2005

Re: Celtics @ Sixers 7 pm ET 

Post#221 » by Sixerscan » Thu Nov 20, 2014 2:53 am

ryst wrote:
roma258 wrote:
ryst wrote:
then fire the GM , he brought the players

The thing is, everyone saw this coming. It's been a running joke since the draft. What did we expect would happen?


I didn't expect the team to go 0-30 to start the season, they took it too far


0-30 is 19 games away, aka over a month's worth of games. Can they at least get halfway there before you start acting like is already happened?
ryst
Banned User
Posts: 7,777
And1: 506
Joined: Feb 18, 2003

Re: Celtics @ Sixers 7 pm ET 

Post#222 » by ryst » Thu Nov 20, 2014 2:55 am

Sixerscan wrote:
ryst wrote:
roma258 wrote:The thing is, everyone saw this coming. It's been a running joke since the draft. What did we expect would happen?


I didn't expect the team to go 0-30 to start the season, they took it too far


0-30 is 19 games away, aka over a month's worth of games. Can they at least get halfway there before you start acting like is already happened?


I am just speculating
WorldBeFree
Starter
Posts: 2,307
And1: 406
Joined: Jun 29, 2014
   

Re: AW: Celtics @ Sixers 7 pm ET 

Post#223 » by WorldBeFree » Thu Nov 20, 2014 2:56 am

Sixerscan wrote:
WorldBeFree wrote:
roma258 wrote:It's hard to get on Brett Brown's case, because he has so little to work with, but this team is out to sea man. No concept of what they're trying to achieve out there. And KJ only getting 11 minutes? Wtf...

Its Browns fault, doesnt run plays everyone running around with no.idea what to do.
Edit solomon hill just made a amazing buzzer beater. When pacers can win why we cant?

Sent from my D2303 using RealGM Forums mobile app


There's not many "plays" in the kind of offense they are running. It's a motion offense where you make decisions based on where the ball moves.

They aren't a lot of "plays" in many NBA offenses in general. This isn't high school ball.

Where is the motion? I consider it a play and where is the ball movement? Ball falling to floor and getting back up into mcw hand isnt it ^^
I am from europe, here plays arent only for high schools. Bad teams should run plays, if they dont have a good to great player on their team to ISO or draw double teams and so on

Sent from my D2303 using RealGM Forums mobile app
sixersblue
Rookie
Posts: 1,003
And1: 224
Joined: May 20, 2013
 

Re: Celtics @ Sixers 7 pm ET 

Post#224 » by sixersblue » Thu Nov 20, 2014 2:56 am

MRxBLACK wrote:
sixersblue wrote:
MRxBLACK wrote:Oh yeah I miss those mediocre teams too.......


What wrong with mediocre actually? Hinkie. We don't need to go down before going to the top.

History disagrees with you. There are many examples.


Right, but we do not want to repeat the history. It is bloody. .
User avatar
Embiid P
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,060
And1: 2,290
Joined: Nov 07, 2013
     

Re: Celtics @ Sixers 7 pm ET 

Post#225 » by Embiid P » Thu Nov 20, 2014 2:57 am

Mik317 wrote:If you jokers are about to wish to go back to the old days...I am going to take a long break from this board.

You guys cried for the tank for years. You get it and suddenly are crying for more of the same exact **** you complained about?

0-30 would be insane and too much yes. But lets be real here...3-27 or 10-20 isn't much better and at the end of the day this is exactly what you are were asking for.


holy **** how quick you are all to jump off the bandwagon when holy crap...we actually are tanking?!?

wow


IKR? I thought they knew what we were getting into before the season started. Now things changed since we are 0-11? I know this team is tough to watch on a nightly basis, but remember we lost 26 straight last year. If we can survive that as an NBA fanbase, we can pretty much survive anything.
ryst
Banned User
Posts: 7,777
And1: 506
Joined: Feb 18, 2003

Re: Celtics @ Sixers 7 pm ET 

Post#226 » by ryst » Thu Nov 20, 2014 2:59 am

I don't see anyone crying about the tanking or the plan
I see people understand reality
and the reality after a 26 losing streak last year and maybe similar streak to start the season this year some people(including me) think it is too much and might get people fired

what is so outrageous about that?
GoSixersBro
Head Coach
Posts: 7,175
And1: 2,799
Joined: May 26, 2010
   

Re: Celtics @ Sixers 7 pm ET 

Post#227 » by GoSixersBro » Thu Nov 20, 2014 2:59 am

It would be a lot cooler if we tanked this amazingly in 2013-2014 when thinking about draft classes, but I'm not going to complain. This is what we're in for and it will be worth it in the end.
Here Lies The Process
May 13, 2013 - April 6, 2016
AAKing23
Junior
Posts: 466
And1: 171
Joined: Oct 17, 2013
     

Re: Celtics @ Sixers 7 pm ET 

Post#228 » by AAKing23 » Thu Nov 20, 2014 3:02 am

I don't wanna see Thompson, Davies or Mbah a Moute back next season, I've seen enough of them. Davies and Thompson are not NBA players and they have no upside.
Sixerscan
Senior Mod - 76ers
Senior Mod - 76ers
Posts: 33,946
And1: 16,328
Joined: Jan 25, 2005

Re: AW: Celtics @ Sixers 7 pm ET 

Post#229 » by Sixerscan » Thu Nov 20, 2014 3:03 am

WorldBeFree wrote:
Sixerscan wrote:
WorldBeFree wrote:Its Browns fault, doesnt run plays everyone running around with no.idea what to do.
Edit solomon hill just made a amazing buzzer beater. When pacers can win why we cant?

Sent from my D2303 using RealGM Forums mobile app


There's not many "plays" in the kind of offense they are running. It's a motion offense where you make decisions based on where the ball moves.

They aren't a lot of "plays" in many NBA offenses in general. This isn't high school ball.

Where is the motion? I consider it a play and where is the ball movement? Ball falling to floor and getting back up into mcw hand isnt it ^^
I am from europe, here plays arent only for high schools. Bad teams should run plays, if they dont have a good to great player on their team to ISO or draw double teams and so on

Sent from my D2303 using RealGM Forums mobile app


I completely agree that they aren't running the offense as well as they could be. That is partially Brown's fault.
sixersblue
Rookie
Posts: 1,003
And1: 224
Joined: May 20, 2013
 

Re: Celtics @ Sixers 7 pm ET 

Post#230 » by sixersblue » Thu Nov 20, 2014 3:03 am

ryst wrote:I don't see anyone crying about the tanking or the plan
I see people understand reality
and the reality after a 26 losing streak last year and maybe similar streak to start the season this year some people(including me) think it is too much and might get people fired

what is so outrageous about that?


Agree. We know the plan and are sticking to it with no regret at all. The good days are yet to come.
WorldBeFree
Starter
Posts: 2,307
And1: 406
Joined: Jun 29, 2014
   

Re: Celtics @ Sixers 7 pm ET 

Post#231 » by WorldBeFree » Thu Nov 20, 2014 3:03 am

No one is against the tank, the super tank is to much. Also just lost some money to my teammate.
Its just we all see how they play, how some of them suck hard, how kj sits. There is no need for all of that. The tank is on, everyone accepts it, we just dont want to suck that hard...

Sent from my D2303 using RealGM Forums mobile app
User avatar
Embiid P
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,060
And1: 2,290
Joined: Nov 07, 2013
     

Re: Celtics @ Sixers 7 pm ET 

Post#232 » by Embiid P » Thu Nov 20, 2014 3:05 am

ryst wrote:I don't see anyone crying about the tanking or the plan
I see people understand reality
and the reality after a 26 losing streak last year and maybe similar streak to start the season this year some people(including me) think it is too much and might get people fired

what is so outrageous about that?


But seriously why are people complaining about a season that we knew was a lost cause since draft night? In the end is there really that much of a difference between a 5 win team and a 20 win team? No, a bad team is still a bad team. I get the whole wanting to win from a player's standpoint to boost morale, but as fans, we all should have known what we were getting into months before the season started.
Mogul
Junior
Posts: 418
And1: 267
Joined: Nov 15, 2014
 

Re: Celtics @ Sixers 7 pm ET 

Post#233 » by Mogul » Thu Nov 20, 2014 3:08 am

As long as we win 1 out of every 27, I'm fine with super-sucking. I just don't want that record losing streak.
Sixerscan
Senior Mod - 76ers
Senior Mod - 76ers
Posts: 33,946
And1: 16,328
Joined: Jan 25, 2005

Re: Celtics @ Sixers 7 pm ET 

Post#234 » by Sixerscan » Thu Nov 20, 2014 3:10 am

ryst wrote:I don't see anyone crying about the tanking or the plan
I see people understand reality
and the reality after a 26 losing streak last year and maybe similar streak to start the season this year some people(including me) think it is too much and might get people fired

what is so outrageous about that?


I understand your point from management's perspective (they need someone to take the fall. still don't think they should do it though).

I don't understand it from your perspective. Do you just get pleasure out of seeing people lose their jobs?
WorldBeFree
Starter
Posts: 2,307
And1: 406
Joined: Jun 29, 2014
   

Re: AW: Celtics @ Sixers 7 pm ET 

Post#235 » by WorldBeFree » Thu Nov 20, 2014 3:10 am

Stinky Hinkie wrote:
ryst wrote:I don't see anyone crying about the tanking or the plan
I see people understand reality
and the reality after a 26 losing streak last year and maybe similar streak to start the season this year some people(including me) think it is too much and might get people fired

what is so outrageous about that?


But seriously why are people complaining about a season that we knew was a lost cause since draft night? In the end is there really that much of a difference between a 5 win team and a 20 win team? No, a bad team is still a bad team. I get the whole wanting to win from a player's standpoint to boost morale, but as fans, we all should have known what we were getting into months before the season started.

I somehow look at it as a player, imagine myself how it must feel when you lose every game. Also as a fan i dont want that my team loses, just i accept the tank doesnt i want to lose. I watch every game with hopes of winning, if i dont i could just stop watching. If i could choose between winning 5 or 20 i take 20.

Sent from my D2303 using RealGM Forums mobile app
sixersblue
Rookie
Posts: 1,003
And1: 224
Joined: May 20, 2013
 

Re: Celtics @ Sixers 7 pm ET 

Post#236 » by sixersblue » Thu Nov 20, 2014 3:12 am

no one is against tanking but could the Sixers tank beautifully?
Bigballer74
Sophomore
Posts: 238
And1: 93
Joined: Jun 14, 2013
       

Re: Celtics @ Sixers 7 pm ET 

Post#237 » by Bigballer74 » Thu Nov 20, 2014 3:13 am

Sixerscan wrote:
ryst wrote:I don't see anyone crying about the tanking or the plan
I see people understand reality
and the reality after a 26 losing streak last year and maybe similar streak to start the season this year some people(including me) think it is too much and might get people fired

what is so outrageous about that?


I understand your point from management's perspective (they need someone to take the fall. still don't think they should do it though).

I don't understand it from your perspective. Do you just get pleasure out of seeing people lose their jobs?

It's hard as a true fan to root for your team to lose. Everybody knows what the tank entails, living through it is something different. I can see where his anguish comes from. You never expect it to be THIS bad. The team has no redeeming qualities right now.
sixersblue
Rookie
Posts: 1,003
And1: 224
Joined: May 20, 2013
 

Re: Celtics @ Sixers 7 pm ET 

Post#238 » by sixersblue » Thu Nov 20, 2014 3:18 am

We have to think in this way, a blow out loss is better than close loss.
User avatar
Embiid P
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,060
And1: 2,290
Joined: Nov 07, 2013
     

Re: AW: Celtics @ Sixers 7 pm ET 

Post#239 » by Embiid P » Thu Nov 20, 2014 3:18 am

WorldBeFree wrote:
Stinky Hinkie wrote:
ryst wrote:I don't see anyone crying about the tanking or the plan
I see people understand reality
and the reality after a 26 losing streak last year and maybe similar streak to start the season this year some people(including me) think it is too much and might get people fired

what is so outrageous about that?


But seriously why are people complaining about a season that we knew was a lost cause since draft night? In the end is there really that much of a difference between a 5 win team and a 20 win team? No, a bad team is still a bad team. I get the whole wanting to win from a player's standpoint to boost morale, but as fans, we all should have known what we were getting into months before the season started.

I somehow look at it as a player, imagine myself how it must feel when you lose every game. Also as a fan i dont want that my team loses, just i accept the tank doesnt i want to lose. I watch every game with hopes of winning, if i dont i could just stop watching. If i could choose between winning 5 or 20 i take 20.

Sent from my D2303 using RealGM Forums mobile app


Have you ever heard the saying, "You can polish a turd all you want to, but at the end of the day it's still a turd"? Point is we are still a bad team no matter how much management tries to sugarcoat it with D league signings and average NBA role players.

For so long we were a bad team that was simply in denial of that fact by trying to make the playoffs as a 7th or 8th seed to get knocked out in the first round. Now Hinkie and company have accepted our status and have made no secret of it. Acceptance is the first step to getting better no?
Sixerscan
Senior Mod - 76ers
Senior Mod - 76ers
Posts: 33,946
And1: 16,328
Joined: Jan 25, 2005

Re: Celtics @ Sixers 7 pm ET 

Post#240 » by Sixerscan » Thu Nov 20, 2014 3:21 am

Bigballer74 wrote:
Sixerscan wrote:
ryst wrote:I don't see anyone crying about the tanking or the plan
I see people understand reality
and the reality after a 26 losing streak last year and maybe similar streak to start the season this year some people(including me) think it is too much and might get people fired

what is so outrageous about that?


I understand your point from management's perspective (they need someone to take the fall. still don't think they should do it though).

I don't understand it from your perspective. Do you just get pleasure out of seeing people lose their jobs?

It's hard as a true fan to root for your team to lose. Everybody knows what the tank entails, living through it is something different. I can see where his anguish comes from. You never expect it to be THIS bad. The team has no redeeming qualities right now.


So that means they should be fired in the middle of the plan? Because it's slightly worse than you thought it would be?

If this is still going on in a few years, fine, let them go. You've invested a lot at this point, let them carry out what they said they would do.

Return to Philadelphia 76ers