ProcessDoctor wrote:Negrodamus wrote:ProcessDoctor wrote:
This is not the equivalence of finishing last or near-last in every combine workout.
You're a smart poster. I don't think I need to explain to you how much young basketball players can change in 1 to 2 years.
"Are we sure this Joel Embiid guys is going to be better than Noah Vonleh? Noah (18.81 yrs at draft) is almost 2 years younger than Embiid (20.25 yrs at draft). Vonleh is scoring the same clip as Embiid, but is way better at rebound, has better FT shooting, and shoots 48% from three all while being younger!"
This is just one example, but thanks for the condescending post.
Sorry, was not trying to be an ****. I just think you've been turning a blind eye to all the Queen negatives and Ace positives, including the significant age discrepancy. Just like every other metric/stat, age is not the only indicator to project how good a player will be, but I think we have to acknowledge it here.
Why is Ace even being brought into a conversation about Derik Queen? I am actively avoiding talking about him.
And I have been plenty critical of Queen throughout the entire draft discussion. I've given proper **** over getting lazy on defense, inconsistent effort, ambitious passes. I feel like that's lost in the sauce because I'm critical of the guy that everyone is mocking to be our pick and is a statistical nightmare for what I value.
I clearly value different things about draft prospects than you do. I could be wrong. I'm completely okay with it.