WVU wrote:This can't be the best deal out there. I refuse to believe that it is.
It probably isn't but in BC's eyes it is, and since he's the GM his eyes are the only ones that matter
Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan
WVU wrote:This can't be the best deal out there. I refuse to believe that it is.
NYSixersFan wrote:quite simply, If I were GM, We would have a good young playoff team right now; with cap flexibility going forward
NYSixersFan wrote:I'D BE more then happy to debate you or anyone else on specifics
NYSixersFan wrote:How can I give you specifics? I'm not talking to other GM's
WVU wrote:This can't be the best deal out there. I refuse to believe that it is.
Skates wrote:Ericb5 wrote:The important thing here is that the risk of racing to the middle was very much lessened by winning the lottery.
We already HAVE(counting Simmons) the core players that are hard to find once you reach the middle.
So there is no artificial cap on our potential.
Plus with the Kings swap and the Lakers pick we don't need to be horrible next year to get a good pick or picks.
The only risk in a deal like this(assuming that Teague signs with us for reasonable money) is losing out on a better potential deal somewhere else.
Noel can't play the 4, and is behind Embiid. This is not a big loss, especially if it means that we are going to give it a shot with Okafor.
I would much rather do this deal than trade Okafor for Dunn or Murray.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No it was not. Plenty of superstars get stuck in mediocrity and having a wealth of future assets does not somehow make squandering one now somehow okay or not to be worried about. Great potential can go to garbage in a millisecond, it has happened here before and a few years later you are trading Simmons for Jeff Hornacek, Andrew Lang and Tim Perry. Don't anyone kid yourselves that a bad GM can't screw up the first pick in the draft and a seeming wealth of riches everywhere else. 1986 people, look it up.
Geaux_Hawks wrote:Attempting to come to in peace, but Teague could very well re-up in Philly.Not many teams will be looking for PG's after next year that can give him a starting gig, enough money, and potential to compete. If BC is making this move, he must believe Embiid will be fine, and is willing to keep Teague beyond next year.
I highly doubt Teague will need the max to stay. If it makes you feel better, you can keep Covington because I don't think he is that special of a player. Even coming off the bench.
Ericb5 wrote:Geaux_Hawks wrote:Attempting to come to in peace, but Teague could very well re-up in Philly.Not many teams will be looking for PG's after next year that can give him a starting gig, enough money, and potential to compete. If BC is making this move, he must believe Embiid will be fine, and is willing to keep Teague beyond next year.
I highly doubt Teague will need the max to stay. If it makes you feel better, you can keep Covington because I don't think he is that special of a player. Even coming off the bench.
I agree, but we CAN'T give up Noel for a rental. He would have to agree to an extension for me to feel comfortable about this.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
timLH wrote:Ericb5 wrote:The important thing here is that the risk of racing to the middle was very much lessened by winning the lottery.
We already HAVE(counting Simmons) the core players that are hard to find once you reach the middle.
So there is no artificial cap on our potential.
Plus with the Kings swap and the Lakers pick we don't need to be horrible next year to get a good pick or picks.
The only risk in a deal like this(assuming that Teague signs with us for reasonable money) is losing out on a better potential deal somewhere else.
Noel can't play the 4, and is behind Embiid. This is not a big loss, especially if it means that we are going to give it a shot with Okafor.
I would much rather do this deal than trade Okafor for Dunn or Murray.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We are not even sure if Embiid can actually play. How can you say Noel is behind Biid?
tk76 wrote:Look at BC's track record with trades in TOR. This one would fit the profile.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/executives/colanbr99x.html
Geaux_Hawks wrote:Ericb5 wrote:Geaux_Hawks wrote:Attempting to come to in peace, but Teague could very well re-up in Philly.Not many teams will be looking for PG's after next year that can give him a starting gig, enough money, and potential to compete. If BC is making this move, he must believe Embiid will be fine, and is willing to keep Teague beyond next year.
I highly doubt Teague will need the max to stay. If it makes you feel better, you can keep Covington because I don't think he is that special of a player. Even coming off the bench.
I agree, but we CAN'T give up Noel for a rental. He would have to agree to an extension for me to feel comfortable about this.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I think this deal only happens if Teague is willing to stick around.
marcush wrote:Geaux_Hawks wrote:Ericb5 wrote:
I agree, but we CAN'T give up Noel for a rental. He would have to agree to an extension for me to feel comfortable about this.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I think this deal only happens if Teague is willing to stick around.
Don't underestimate Bryan's stupidity.
Ericb5 wrote:If he trades Noel for a rental he IS stupid.
Stanford wrote:tk76 wrote:Look at BC's track record with trades in TOR. This one would fit the profile.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/executives/colanbr99x.html
Love this stuff. I forgot all about Nate Jawai. What a terrible trade.
Good lord he was awful.
Stanford wrote:tk76 wrote:Look at BC's track record with trades in TOR. This one would fit the profile.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/executives/colanbr99x.html
Love this stuff. I forgot all about Nate Jawai. What a terrible trade.
Good lord he was awful.
GimmeDat wrote:Outsiders perspective - bad deal. He's a rental and his age doesn't fit your success window. I can see Colangelo doing it though. Especially if you guys are throwing in Stauskas and Covington, as per wiretap, you'd be getting fleeced.
I can only speak for the Bulls, but we would immediately offer you a combination of McDermott/Portis/Felicio/#14/Kings pick etc. for Noel.
tk76 wrote:GimmeDat wrote:Outsiders perspective - bad deal. He's a rental and his age doesn't fit your success window. I can see Colangelo doing it though. Especially if you guys are throwing in Stauskas and Covington, as per wiretap, you'd be getting fleeced.
I can only speak for the Bulls, but we would immediately offer you a combination of McDermott/Portis/Felicio/#14/Kings pick etc. for Noel.
Bryan Colangelo is sitting on a gold mine of assets and has a track record of short-sighted moves. If I were an NBA GM I'd have BC on speed dial before the fire sale is over.