kingofthecourt67 wrote:I want to throw Gordon Hayward's name into the Jrue/Lowry debate. In fact he is Holiday's age without the chronic injury risk. I wouldn't mind throwing the max at him.
Hayward only leaves Utah to go to Boston with Stevens
Moderators: BullyKing, HartfordWhalers, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan
kingofthecourt67 wrote:I want to throw Gordon Hayward's name into the Jrue/Lowry debate. In fact he is Holiday's age without the chronic injury risk. I wouldn't mind throwing the max at him.
Mik317 wrote:kingofthecourt67 wrote:I want to throw Gordon Hayward's name into the Jrue/Lowry debate. In fact he is Holiday's age without the chronic injury risk. I wouldn't mind throwing the max at him.
Hayward only leaves Utah to go to Boston with Stevens

Mik317 wrote:kingofthecourt67 wrote:I want to throw Gordon Hayward's name into the Jrue/Lowry debate. In fact he is Holiday's age without the chronic injury risk. I wouldn't mind throwing the max at him.
Hayward only leaves Utah to go to Boston with Stevens
Mik317 wrote:kingofthecourt67 wrote:I want to throw Gordon Hayward's name into the Jrue/Lowry debate. In fact he is Holiday's age without the chronic injury risk. I wouldn't mind throwing the max at him.
Hayward only leaves Utah to go to Boston with Stevens
bedjawII wrote:Mik317 wrote:kingofthecourt67 wrote:I want to throw Gordon Hayward's name into the Jrue/Lowry debate. In fact he is Holiday's age without the chronic injury risk. I wouldn't mind throwing the max at him.
Hayward only leaves Utah to go to Boston with Stevens
The playing for your old college coach is really overblown. They outside expectations would be unfair, when in reality Hayward has had substantially more individual success without Steven's then he has with him. You can say that for almost any star NBA player.
kingofthecourt67 wrote:I want to throw Gordon Hayward's name into the Jrue/Lowry debate. In fact he is Holiday's age without the chronic injury risk. I wouldn't mind throwing the max at him.
jbent87 wrote:bedjawII wrote:Mik317 wrote:Hayward only leaves Utah to go to Boston with Stevens
The playing for your old college coach is really overblown. They outside expectations would be unfair, when in reality Hayward has had substantially more individual success without Steven's then he has with him. You can say that for almost any star NBA player.
Yeah the narrative of Hayward to Boston bc of Stevens is so tired. But that's what Bill Simmons puts out there and engraves into that fanbases' heads. With a healthy Avery Bradley/Marcus Smart/Jae Crowder where does he even fit?
Adam Silver wrote:"Gross incompetence is acceptable; strategic gaming of a flawed system is not."
kriss73 wrote:I've got a feeling that this trade is dead.
Or at least it will be be the last resort.
bedjawII wrote:The playing for your old college coach is really overblown. They outside expectations would be unfair, when in reality Hayward has had substantially more individual success without Steven's then he has with him. You can say that for almost any star NBA player.Mik317 wrote:kingofthecourt67 wrote:I want to throw Gordon Hayward's name into the Jrue/Lowry debate. In fact he is Holiday's age without the chronic injury risk. I wouldn't mind throwing the max at him.
Hayward only leaves Utah to go to Boston with Stevens

HotelVitale wrote:bedjawII wrote:The playing for your old college coach is really overblown. They outside expectations would be unfair, when in reality Hayward has had substantially more individual success without Steven's then he has with him. You can say that for almost any star NBA player.Mik317 wrote:Hayward only leaves Utah to go to Boston with Stevens
Yup. Rumors of him to Boston might make some sense--they're a little better than UTA now and he might like the roster or the change to a bigger city--but this coach thing is goofy. I don't get why people think that spending like 6 months with some dude when you were 18 or 19 years old creates a bigger bond than spending like 8 years with an organization and city like Hayward has in Utah.
51X3RF4N wrote:I wouldn't be surprised at all if a deal is done in the next 10 days, where Okafor goes to New Orleans, a 3rd team picks up some other pieces and sends stuff to New Orleans, and Jrue comes to Philly with a pick from another team. I really think that is the intention for BC. He wants Jrue, wants to re-sign him and put him next to Simmons. And if you can get that for Jah, you do it. Perfect complement to Ben. Defends the PG's, plays off ball, can shoot from deep, can get his own buckets when necessary, can handle the rock and run the offense from time to time. He's literally a perfect fit next to Ben.
I wouldn't be surprised if you see this type of deal go down, and then Jrue is re-signed to a 4 year deal worth $20M+ per year. And then, the Sixers use Noel, picks, and other assets to go get studs at SG and PF.
Jrue/SG/Simmons/PF/Embiid Just my guess, but you never know. I think BC is not caring about the draft as much because he doesn't want to "continue" the process and get younger, and less experienced. He'll go with vet stars over "potential" stars any day. I think he wants to be a legit competitive top 4 Eastern Conference team as early as next season, and he's got 2 pieces to that puzzle currently on the roster. If he can get a 3rd piece for just Jah, and then flip Noel + assets for another 2 pieces, he's gonna do that.
Sportfan73 wrote:51X3RF4N wrote:I wouldn't be surprised at all if a deal is done in the next 10 days, where Okafor goes to New Orleans, a 3rd team picks up some other pieces and sends stuff to New Orleans, and Jrue comes to Philly with a pick from another team. I really think that is the intention for BC. He wants Jrue, wants to re-sign him and put him next to Simmons. And if you can get that for Jah, you do it. Perfect complement to Ben. Defends the PG's, plays off ball, can shoot from deep, can get his own buckets when necessary, can handle the rock and run the offense from time to time. He's literally a perfect fit next to Ben.
I wouldn't be surprised if you see this type of deal go down, and then Jrue is re-signed to a 4 year deal worth $20M+ per year. And then, the Sixers use Noel, picks, and other assets to go get studs at SG and PF.
Jrue/SG/Simmons/PF/Embiid Just my guess, but you never know. I think BC is not caring about the draft as much because he doesn't want to "continue" the process and get younger, and less experienced. He'll go with vet stars over "potential" stars any day. I think he wants to be a legit competitive top 4 Eastern Conference team as early as next season, and he's got 2 pieces to that puzzle currently on the roster. If he can get a 3rd piece for just Jah, and then flip Noel + assets for another 2 pieces, he's gonna do that.
I don't disagree with this. I would take Lauri with our second lotto pick to plug at the 4.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
HartfordWhalers wrote:He was there for 2 years. In contrast, this is his 3rd year with Quin Snyder.HotelVitale wrote:Yup. Rumors of him to Boston might make some sense--they're a little better than UTA now and he might like the roster or the change to a bigger city--but this coach thing is goofy. I don't get why people think that spending like 6 months with some dude when you were 18 or 19 years old creates a bigger bond than spending like 8 years with an organization and city like Hayward has in Utah.bedjawII wrote: The playing for your old college coach is really overblown. They outside expectations would be unfair, when in reality Hayward has had substantially more individual success without Steven's then he has with him. You can say that for almost any star NBA player.
Arsenal wrote:Jrue vs. Lowry aside, if BC's plan is to give up assets to trade for Jrue a few months before he becomes an UNRESTRICTED FREE AGENT, then he's even dumber than the worst caricatures of him. That would be a colossally stupid give away of precious assets that took a lot of time and sacrifice to obtain. I can't understand how anyone can support that.
If we're shipping out assets, it should be for a star player who is locked up on a long-term contract. Not a guy we can sign for just money in 3 months.
51X3RF4N wrote:Arsenal wrote:Jrue vs. Lowry aside, if BC's plan is to give up assets to trade for Jrue a few months before he becomes an UNRESTRICTED FREE AGENT, then he's even dumber than the worst caricatures of him. That would be a colossally stupid give away of precious assets that took a lot of time and sacrifice to obtain. I can't understand how anyone can support that.
If we're shipping out assets, it should be for a star player who is locked up on a long-term contract. Not a guy we can sign for just money in 3 months.
I agree with this, with the exception that if Okafor is the only asset going out, and a potential 1st round pick is coming back plus Jrue, then I wouldn't be too upset. Okafor's value is clearly quite low, or he already would've been traded for what we would consider "fair value". So, to take an "asset" like Okafor and turn him into a trial period of Jrue with Simmons, an evaluation for half a season if it would even work or not before you commit those big bucks to him in the offseason, plus potentially get a pick out of it, I'm all for that.