ImageImageImage

Markelle Fultz Discussion III: For Fultz and going forward (see 2017 draft thread for trade discussion)

Moderators: BullyKing, HartfordWhalers, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan

User avatar
Mik317
RealGM
Posts: 41,283
And1: 19,911
Joined: May 31, 2005
Location: In Spain...without the S
       

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#361 » by Mik317 » Mon Dec 11, 2017 10:55 pm

Negrodamus wrote:
Mik317 wrote:that would make too much sense tho.

can't have that around here.

come on son


I think someone said something to the effect that the G-League is beneath him. It's the only reason I posted about it. We scurry him off before the practice is open to the media. He's taking 3 weeks off after the team releases a statement about his shoulder being pain free.

The annoying part of this ridiculous saga is that it's easier to be blissfully ignorant to the absurdity and believe that this entire situation was only about his shoulder. So when he comes back and plays well (which everyone on this board is hoping for), there will be a handful of posters on here that will make it intolerable when they go on some self righteous witch hunt over the posters that have been skeptical over a very ambiguous situation.


not going to lie I might be one of those **** gloating if it comes to that lol. Then again I also believe in Karma so as soon as I'd do so, he'd start playing as asscheeks so yeah.

but as for the GLeague thing...yeah its a no brainer he should be getting reps there..that is legit one of the reasons we even have the gleague ffs.

but this franchise is too shook at what the optics of that would be so they won't risk it. Could you imagine him going to the Dleague, still shoot like ass and plays poorly? maaaaaaaan. I think Lloyd lays it on too think with his hatred of Fultz (by proxy of the trade of course) but he does have a point in that I think a lot of this is Colangelo really wanting to prove himself and Fultz **** up harms that quite a bit. Fultz is by all means, Bryan's first big move since being handed the job. Simmons technically but even that was off the backs of us being assjuice ie. tanking/Hinkie. He really needs Fultz to be what everyone says he is to have something of his own to point to as HIS guy. So that plays a major part in all of this, as Fultz is not going to hit the court until every possible potential setback is fixed.
#NeverGonnaBeGood
XDevilBoiX
Head Coach
Posts: 7,173
And1: 2,481
Joined: Dec 05, 2014
Location: PA
       

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#362 » by XDevilBoiX » Mon Dec 11, 2017 11:27 pm

HIS(Fultz) guy made him(BC) look bad already lol. BC threw him to the wolves with a injured shoulder.
gdog2004
Starter
Posts: 2,183
And1: 706
Joined: Jun 01, 2014
   

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#363 » by gdog2004 » Mon Dec 11, 2017 11:36 pm

Mik317 wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:
Mik317 wrote:that would make too much sense tho.

can't have that around here.

come on son


I think someone said something to the effect that the G-League is beneath him. It's the only reason I posted about it. We scurry him off before the practice is open to the media. He's taking 3 weeks off after the team releases a statement about his shoulder being pain free.

The annoying part of this ridiculous saga is that it's easier to be blissfully ignorant to the absurdity and believe that this entire situation was only about his shoulder. So when he comes back and plays well (which everyone on this board is hoping for), there will be a handful of posters on here that will make it intolerable when they go on some self righteous witch hunt over the posters that have been skeptical over a very ambiguous situation.


not going to lie I might be one of those **** gloating if it comes to that lol. Then again I also believe in Karma so as soon as I'd do so, he'd start playing as asscheeks so yeah.

but as for the GLeague thing...yeah its a no brainer he should be getting reps there..that is legit one of the reasons we even have the gleague ffs.

but this franchise is too shook at what the optics of that would be so they won't risk it. Could you imagine him going to the Dleague, still shoot like ass and plays poorly? maaaaaaaan. I think Lloyd lays it on too think with his hatred of Fultz (by proxy of the trade of course) but he does have a point in that I think a lot of this is Colangelo really wanting to prove himself and Fultz **** up harms that quite a bit. Fultz is by all means, Bryan's first big move since being handed the job. Simmons technically but even that was off the backs of us being assjuice ie. tanking/Hinkie. He really needs Fultz to be what everyone says he is to have something of his own to point to as HIS guy. So that plays a major part in all of this, as Fultz is not going to hit the court until every possible potential setback is fixed.


Lotta truth there. If Fultz is a bust, or is even just mediocre, it could mean BC's job. It would be one thing if he selected him third, but to trade away a prime asset AND essentially bypass the best rookie from this class(Tatum), well that's a fire-able offense.
LloydFree
RealGM
Posts: 15,839
And1: 11,656
Joined: Aug 20, 2012
Location: Somewhere near the Jersey Turnpike, between exit 4 and 15E

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#364 » by LloydFree » Tue Dec 12, 2017 12:18 am

gdog2004 wrote:
Mik317 wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:
I think someone said something to the effect that the G-League is beneath him. It's the only reason I posted about it. We scurry him off before the practice is open to the media. He's taking 3 weeks off after the team releases a statement about his shoulder being pain free.

The annoying part of this ridiculous saga is that it's easier to be blissfully ignorant to the absurdity and believe that this entire situation was only about his shoulder. So when he comes back and plays well (which everyone on this board is hoping for), there will be a handful of posters on here that will make it intolerable when they go on some self righteous witch hunt over the posters that have been skeptical over a very ambiguous situation.


not going to lie I might be one of those **** gloating if it comes to that lol. Then again I also believe in Karma so as soon as I'd do so, he'd start playing as asscheeks so yeah.

but as for the GLeague thing...yeah its a no brainer he should be getting reps there..that is legit one of the reasons we even have the gleague ffs.

but this franchise is too shook at what the optics of that would be so they won't risk it. Could you imagine him going to the Dleague, still shoot like ass and plays poorly? maaaaaaaan. I think Lloyd lays it on too think with his hatred of Fultz (by proxy of the trade of course) but he does have a point in that I think a lot of this is Colangelo really wanting to prove himself and Fultz **** up harms that quite a bit. Fultz is by all means, Bryan's first big move since being handed the job. Simmons technically but even that was off the backs of us being assjuice ie. tanking/Hinkie. He really needs Fultz to be what everyone says he is to have something of his own to point to as HIS guy. So that plays a major part in all of this, as Fultz is not going to hit the court until every possible potential setback is fixed.


Lotta truth there. If Fultz is a bust, or is even just mediocre, it could mean BC's job. It would be one thing if he selected him third, but to trade away a prime asset AND essentially bypass the best rookie from this class(Tatum), well that's a fire-able offense.

Though he should have been fired on the spot for that ridiculous trade, they're not going to fire him for this. No matter what Fultz looks like. Ownership practically begged him to take the job. Colangelo sold out the arena with that trade, due to local talk radio promoting Fultz as some generational talent. His job is secure.
Fischella wrote:I think none of you guys that are pro-Embiid no how basketball works today.. is way easier to win it all with Omer Asik than Olajuwon.
Actually if you ask me which Center I want for my perfect championship caliber team, I will chose Asik hands down
Hardcore6erFan
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,833
And1: 680
Joined: Jun 20, 2012
   

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#365 » by Hardcore6erFan » Tue Dec 12, 2017 12:20 am

I can't believe people actually think this is purely a physical injury and are defending the organization's handling of Fultz. Carson Wentz played 4 snaps with a torn acl and threw a TD pass, but Fultz needs another 3 weeks when he is pain free? Give me a freaking break. There's no injury that would make Fultz shoot foul shouts the way he shot them. This is a psychological issue with him. Stop being naive people.
Ryuzaki
Freshman
Posts: 76
And1: 25
Joined: Oct 31, 2017

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#366 » by Ryuzaki » Tue Dec 12, 2017 12:54 am

Hardcore6erFan wrote:There's no injury that would make Fultz shoot foul shouts the way he shot them.


He literally had to unnaturally force his arm out and away from his body to limit his shoulders ROM which thus reduced the pain he inflicted on himself while shooting ft's. You sound airheaded
Eyeamok
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,953
And1: 3,825
Joined: Mar 02, 2006
 

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#367 » by Eyeamok » Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:11 am

XDevilBoiX wrote:HIS(Fultz) guy made him(BC) look bad already lol. BC threw him to the wolves with a injured shoulder.


And injured ego. But if Fultz comes back and plays well, his sitting out will be just a mere footnote in the history books. Not something people will harp on.
You want it to be one way....but it's the other way.

Marlo
Kobblehead
RealGM
Posts: 40,844
And1: 20,001
Joined: Apr 15, 2010
 

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#368 » by Kobblehead » Tue Dec 12, 2017 2:19 am

Image

"Markelle, say cheese"
ivysixer2000
General Manager
Posts: 8,535
And1: 2,244
Joined: Feb 24, 2005

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#369 » by ivysixer2000 » Tue Dec 12, 2017 2:40 am

Negrodamus wrote:
Mik317 wrote:that would make too much sense tho.

can't have that around here.

come on son


The annoying part of this ridiculous saga is that it's easier to be blissfully ignorant to the absurdity and believe that this entire situation was only about his shoulder. So when he comes back and plays well (which everyone on this board is hoping for), there will be a handful of posters on here that will make it intolerable when they go on some self righteous witch hunt over the posters that have been skeptical over a very ambiguous situation.


I do have a question, don't you think that there is also that handful of posters that are making posting and reading here intolerable right now and over the past few months?

Goes both ways man, throw out all that hate and they gotta be man enough to handle the consequences of those actions whether you want to call it a witch hunt or not.
LongLiveHinkie
RealGM
Posts: 14,263
And1: 3,963
Joined: May 04, 2005

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#370 » by LongLiveHinkie » Tue Dec 12, 2017 2:58 am

Hardcore6erFan wrote:I can't believe people actually think this is purely a physical injury and are defending the organization's handling of Fultz. Carson Wentz played 4 snaps with a torn acl and threw a TD pass, but Fultz needs another 3 weeks when he is pain free? Give me a freaking break. There's no injury that would make Fultz shoot foul shouts the way he shot them. This is a psychological issue with him. Stop being naive people.


lmao wtf does Wentz have to do with Fultz's shooting?
HotelVitale
RealGM
Posts: 16,812
And1: 11,937
Joined: Sep 14, 2007
Location: West Philly, PA

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#371 » by HotelVitale » Tue Dec 12, 2017 4:01 am

If anyone wants a break from wild speculation about injuries we have no way of knowing anything about, I was looking at Porter highlights the other day and saw this Fultz vid that was unexpectedly interesting. It's from 2016 FIBA U18 tourney, games are sloppy and defense weak but the pace is also faster than at his UW/NCAA ones, and you can see a little more how some of his skills might be useful in the quicker and more open NBA games. He's still not exactly explosive but he shows some great crossovers, stutter steps, etc, plus some floaters and in-between moves that will be available to him in NBA games.
Sixers2125
Junior
Posts: 425
And1: 123
Joined: Jan 10, 2017
 

Re: RE: Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#372 » by Sixers2125 » Tue Dec 12, 2017 4:06 am

gdog2004 wrote:
Mik317 wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:
I think someone said something to the effect that the G-League is beneath him. It's the only reason I posted about it. We scurry him off before the practice is open to the media. He's taking 3 weeks off after the team releases a statement about his shoulder being pain free.

The annoying part of this ridiculous saga is that it's easier to be blissfully ignorant to the absurdity and believe that this entire situation was only about his shoulder. So when he comes back and plays well (which everyone on this board is hoping for), there will be a handful of posters on here that will make it intolerable when they go on some self righteous witch hunt over the posters that have been skeptical over a very ambiguous situation.


not going to lie I might be one of those **** gloating if it comes to that lol. Then again I also believe in Karma so as soon as I'd do so, he'd start playing as asscheeks so yeah.

but as for the GLeague thing...yeah its a no brainer he should be getting reps there..that is legit one of the reasons we even have the gleague ffs.

but this franchise is too shook at what the optics of that would be so they won't risk it. Could you imagine him going to the Dleague, still shoot like ass and plays poorly? maaaaaaaan. I think Lloyd lays it on too think with his hatred of Fultz (by proxy of the trade of course) but he does have a point in that I think a lot of this is Colangelo really wanting to prove himself and Fultz **** up harms that quite a bit. Fultz is by all means, Bryan's first big move since being handed the job. Simmons technically but even that was off the backs of us being assjuice ie. tanking/Hinkie. He really needs Fultz to be what everyone says he is to have something of his own to point to as HIS guy. So that plays a major part in all of this, as Fultz is not going to hit the court until every possible potential setback is fixed.


Lotta truth there. If Fultz is a bust, or is even just mediocre, it could mean BC's job. It would be one thing if he selected him third, but to trade away a prime asset AND essentially bypass the best rookie from this class(Tatum), well that's a fire-able offense.
I like that we're already declaring Tatum the best rookie of his class. After what? 25 games? I'm not even sure I don't like Donovan Mitchell over Tatum as of right now.

Sent from my [device_name] using [url]RealGM mobile app[/url]
Simmons25
Analyst
Posts: 3,166
And1: 2,235
Joined: Sep 27, 2016

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#373 » by Simmons25 » Tue Dec 12, 2017 4:55 am

No.
CelticsWin5
Senior
Posts: 579
And1: 377
Joined: Nov 16, 2017

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#374 » by CelticsWin5 » Tue Dec 12, 2017 6:08 am

76ciology wrote:
broseph13 wrote:This team should've drafted Tatum. Not doing so is going to bite us in the you know what...

If you’re short term bias, then yeah definitely. Atleast he can play and shoot almost 50% from 3s

actually, Tatum leads the league in 3pt %. Tatum shot 78% from 3pt in games last week (52% for the season). At the Celtics board, we actually calculated using binomial distribution that Tatum has a low chance (3%) to regress to 42% because we are so deep into the season. Even if he regresses to 45%, that is Ray Allens best season. So prime ray allen is tatums floor this season for the 3pt
eyeatoma
RealGM
Posts: 29,857
And1: 13,153
Joined: Feb 25, 2005
     

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#375 » by eyeatoma » Tue Dec 12, 2017 7:39 am

CelticsWin5 wrote:
76ciology wrote:
broseph13 wrote:This team should've drafted Tatum. Not doing so is going to bite us in the you know what...

If you’re short term bias, then yeah definitely. Atleast he can play and shoot almost 50% from 3s

actually, Tatum leads the league in 3pt %. Tatum shot 78% from 3pt in games last week (52% for the season). At the Celtics board, we actually calculated using binomial distribution that Tatum has a low chance (3%) to regress to 42% because we are so deep into the season. Even if he regresses to 45%, that is Ray Allens best season. So prime ray allen is tatums floor this season for the 3pt


What is the volume of 3 pt shots he takes compared to Allen? Tatum takes 1.6 shots per game. Ray Allen took 2.3 per game for his career, and his highest was 3.4. So no, that doesn't compare to Ray Allen's percentages. :crazy:

I could shoot 50% on 3 pointers by making 1 of 2. That does not mean I'm a better shooter than Ray Allen. The same thing goes for Jayson Tatum. Heck even if Tatum was shooting at the volume that Allen did, he needs to have a career before saying his floor for 3pt shot is prime Ray Allen.
marcush
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,441
And1: 3,214
Joined: May 11, 2013
Location: Melbourne
 

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#376 » by marcush » Tue Dec 12, 2017 8:33 am

Either Fultz puts his big boy pants on or Colangelo needs to get the team some creativity in the backcourt for the 2nd unit.
User avatar
Lovetron Joe
Rookie
Posts: 1,157
And1: 488
Joined: Dec 26, 2014
       

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#377 » by Lovetron Joe » Tue Dec 12, 2017 9:32 am

CelticsWin5 wrote:
76ciology wrote:
broseph13 wrote:This team should've drafted Tatum. Not doing so is going to bite us in the you know what...

If you’re short term bias, then yeah definitely. Atleast he can play and shoot almost 50% from 3s

actually, Tatum leads the league in 3pt %. Tatum shot 78% from 3pt in games last week (52% for the season). At the Celtics board, we actually calculated using binomial distribution that Tatum has a low chance (3%) to regress to 42% because we are so deep into the season. Even if he regresses to 45%, that is Ray Allens best season. So prime ray allen is tatums floor this season for the 3pt


Tatum is 60th in the NBA in 3pt fgs made. He had 4 pts. on 1 for 7 shooting in tonight’s loss to the Bulls. Zero for 4 from three pt land.
Sixers2125
Junior
Posts: 425
And1: 123
Joined: Jan 10, 2017
 

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#378 » by Sixers2125 » Tue Dec 12, 2017 10:13 am

Tatum has a very low usage and is the 4th option on a great team. He only takes wide open shots. Not much is being asked if him yet. He has done a great job but I think a lot of rookies would do great in his position.

Sent from my [device_name] using [url]RealGM mobile app[/url]
LordCovington33
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,383
And1: 5,223
Joined: Nov 15, 2016
   

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#379 » by LordCovington33 » Tue Dec 12, 2017 10:47 am

Simmons25 wrote:Image

I thought that graph was pointing to Ball's three point percentage.
LordCovington33
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,383
And1: 5,223
Joined: Nov 15, 2016
   

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III 

Post#380 » by LordCovington33 » Tue Dec 12, 2017 10:50 am

Sixers2125 wrote:Tatum has a very low usage and is the 4th option on a great team. He only takes wide open shots. Not much is being asked if him yet. He has done a great job but I think a lot of rookies would do great in his position.

Sent from my [device_name] using [url]RealGM mobile app[/url]

He was 3rd pick for a reason. Great 4th option, but likely to piss himself if given the reins.

Return to Philadelphia 76ers