sixers hoops wrote:youngcrev wrote:76ciology wrote:
I’m not here to argue and i just want to know your opinion.
What’s the set-up you think that would be realistically perfect with our team?
Meaning what? Roster build around those 2?
I think you want a primary perimeter option that can run PnR at a high level and shoot off ball, and then a bunch of quick trigger 3 point guys.
If Markelle would have panned out, I think you'd be in a damn near optimal situation right now.
If Jimmy was a more willing shooter you would have had a pretty ideal build last year too (just needed a bench).
Simmons and Embiid give you a foundation for a great defense. Ben gives you transition offense, Jo gives you post offense. Just need perimeter guys that can help them in the half court.
Yeah. The Sixers are so close to championship level, yet so far away. I’ve never been a Brett fan, and think a good GM and coach could build around Joel and Ben fairly quick.
I think Shake and Thybulle are both good fits and solid rotation guys.
I loved the Josh Richardson trade, but Joel and Ben can’t survive with a streaky perimeter shooter like that. Was never a big fan of the Hortford trade, but rather than use a pick to dump him, we may be able to utilize him while we ride out the remainder of the contract. Tobias almost seems untradeable to me.
I’m not sure who would be available as a guard to pair with Shake, but someone like a Kemba would probably make a huge difference in our offense. Most of the guys that come to mind are unattainable all-stars.
Shake's the guy I'm most interested to watch in the playoffs. Does he step up in the limelight and look like that guy we saw on the west coast trip? If so, maybe he can be that guy you want as your PnR/Shooter. If he wilts, I think you go back to looking at him like a bench piece. With Matisse, I think there's a clear cut idea of what he'll be for you in the future as a role player provided he can become a little more consistent with the jumper. Things are a bit more murky with Shake in terms of what level role he'll be able to play offensively and whether he'll be able to hold up defensively in a playoff series.
I'd sure feel a lot more comfortable going into these playoffs right now if they weren't so reliant on those 2.
As for Richardson, Horford and Harris, I think individually none of them is that bad of a fit (well, Horford's at least fine if he's only on with one of Ben and Jo), it's more just a bad fit as a collective, and guys being forced into roles they can't handle. Like, if you had all of those guys or 2 of the 3, and also had that primary playmaker and a shooter, things would actually make sense. It's part of why i don't think you need to completely blow this thing up. I'm on the same page with Kevin O'Connor with CP3 as being a gettable piece that could shift things into place.






