stormi wrote:DCasey91 wrote:I just don’t buy Fox as the second option (Murray isn’t either but you get a package and good depth with him). I’m not an advocate for dvying up the numbers between players and I could be wrong but the depth on defense is abysmal now. It’s soon to be done Green and Thybulle that’s it.
That’s not to say keep Ben either as I wanted him traded before the season started.
Is there any chance for Harris to moved along and we acquire Barnes too?
Fox, Barnes, Bagley
Ben, Harris
Type of deal. Would give us exp and most likely would be a better fit with Embiid. He’s having a career year to boot.
Fox
Green
Barnes
Niang
Embiid
Or go the Spurs route:
Murray
White
Green
Harris
Embiid
Don’t know I like team two more for some reason. Backcourt compliments each other, we have Vassell/Thybulle off the bench, can now move Milton/Korkmaz for picks. Bench like this:
Curry
Vassell
Thybulle
Niang
Drummond
That’s a nice looking team imo
I get where you're coming from, but are you prioritizing the composition of our current roster over attempting to find the pieces to win in the next three years?
By that I mean wouldn't you rather have Fox and Embiid and look to find those versatile defenders to surround them with, as opposed to saying we already have Seth who's a weak defender we can't stomach another one in Fox.
And I don't even think Fox is a poor defender.
I would be on board with a Fox provided the albatross contract of Harris is gone with it. It’s a nice 2 for one deal that I agree with.
Composition for me is ultra important because our flexibility is bunk. Yes it’s obvious we need a secondary option that is clear but that second option is a smallish list for me personally which one that doesn’t include Fox. Brown yes.
For the team of five we can afford to have one bad defender and hide him that’s it. Fox is a negative defender has been throughout his career and nothing I’ve seen would change my opinion on him. His BPM/On/Off for his career, isn’t crash hot either.
I alluded to smaller a DLO when the athleticism fades because winning impact isn’t all that high.
What about a mix and getting Murray for Harris + Brown for Ben? That would be the dream scenario imo.
Celtics are stubborn but Ben actually works on that team.
Then we have:
Murray
Green
Brown
Embiid
As the 4/5 done. Also Green could also be on the go who knows. That’s a top ten offense/defense or at least the nucleus of one. Roles are defined with two way capability.
That’s exactly what I’m looking at. I don’t think it’s going to be one move, it’s a multiple move pivot with each one having its positives and negatives.
It’s a small sample size as the season has just begun, is Fox just going through the motions and Murray running hot? Who knows but I do rate Murray over on defense/playmaking something we need not just scoring.
It’s funny but Levert, Fox, Murray aren’t dissimilar from one another. All have career -200 TS and -200 FG add
Fox is inflation on his usage between the three (the highest) . All three can be injury prone. At least I know from Murray what separates himself is that he’s very good on ball security and playmaking while being basically an All NBA defender level for a guard.