FireMorey wrote:No I don't know he's a loser. I'm against the whole winner/loser talking points when it comes to sports, I think it's stupid and illogical. We pick and choose which wins matter and which don't. Dude has won so many games in this league, but they don't count, only the playoff losses count. It makes no sense.
Just like last year scoring 40 points in the playoffs for the Sixers twice, including two super clutch shots... those don't count, just the game 7. It's all so stupid. All playoff games count the same. You don't get to game 7's unless you win previous games in the series.
These are just baseless narratives sports fans have blindly come to accept because they have agendas against players and want to trash them. But they don't stand up to scrutiny.
100% agree on the overblown narrative bull in the NBA. Harden is a top-40, maybe even top-30 NBA player of all-time, and internet dweebs and the media so easily label him as a choker and loser. Like what the hell are we actually saying?
LeBron was a "loser" until he joined Miami. Giannis has lost several bad series, but he's untouchable because he snuck in one chip.
I don't think the overall culture of how fans and the media define NBA players will change anytime soon but it's nice to hear a perspective not so engrained in it.
Outside of the very tip-top of all-time greats (i.e. top-15ish), every star needs breaks to go their way to "break through", whether thats injury luck, shot luck, favorable opponent/matchup/bracket. There's a great amount of luck involved in winning whether people want to admit it or not.
Edit: last point. If Embiid wins a chip here, with the rest of his resume, he creeps into the top-30 all-time as well. He wins 2, and he's already in Hakeem/Durant territory.