ImageImageImage

Welcome Shake Milton

Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan

smittybanton
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,766
And1: 398
Joined: Jul 30, 2016

Re: Welcome Shake Milton 

Post#41 » by smittybanton » Wed Jun 27, 2018 11:25 pm

Kobblehead wrote:Shake is more a kick of the tires pick. I'd imagine they love what he brings by way of shooting, defense, basketball IQ and measurements, but they question if he can make it athletically.

I don't think knowledge of his availability would have changed their decision to go with Shamet at #26.


Shamet is not uber athletic either. There was no way to know that Milton would've been available. So I'm not claiming they made a mistake. That's the way drafts go. But in hindsight, I'll bet they would've done something different at #26 if you could somehow know you're getting Milton much, much later.

I don't blame them for not taking Robert Williams even though we need a backup five better than Richaun Holmes. But if you KNOW that you can get essentially the same player as Shamet in the 50s, then either Williams, Jacob Evans or Keita Bates Diop looks a little more attractive.
LloydFree
RealGM
Posts: 15,840
And1: 11,657
Joined: Aug 20, 2012
Location: Somewhere near the Jersey Turnpike, between exit 4 and 15E

Re: Welcome Shake Milton 

Post#42 » by LloydFree » Wed Jun 27, 2018 11:32 pm

smittybanton wrote:
LloydFree wrote:
smittybanton wrote:I don't think the Sixers thought Shake would fall to the #50s, and I wonder whether we would've done something different at #26 if we knew we could get Milton at #54.

I don't think what they did at #26 had anything to do with not believing Shake would fall to #54. They could have taken Shake at #38, but they preferred future 2nds. They didn't value him.


Not what I'm saying. My question is whether they would've done something different had they known they could get Shake at 54? It's rhetorical. No one could have known at #26.

OK. I got you. Personally, I would have selected Robert Williams at #26, regardless. Then picked a shooter at #38. But this is where I think Brett the coach, got in the way of Brett the GM. I think he over-drafted Shamet a bit, because he was the best in-motion, long-range shooter, in the draft. He saw him as a plug and play, in his system.
Fischella wrote:I think none of you guys that are pro-Embiid no how basketball works today.. is way easier to win it all with Omer Asik than Olajuwon.
Actually if you ask me which Center I want for my perfect championship caliber team, I will chose Asik hands down
Kobblehead
RealGM
Posts: 40,844
And1: 20,003
Joined: Apr 15, 2010
 

Re: Welcome Shake Milton 

Post#43 » by Kobblehead » Wed Jun 27, 2018 11:51 pm

smittybanton wrote:Shamet is not uber athletic either. There was no way to know that Milton would've been available. So I'm not claiming they made a mistake. That's the way drafts go. But in hindsight, I'll bet they would've done something different at #26 if you could somehow know you're getting Milton much, much later.


Shamet is a fine athlete. He definitely has requisite positional athleticism.

I still don't think Brett would have done anything different. I bet he had great inclination that Milton would be available deep into the 2nd round because I'd imagine all GMs were concerned about his athletic shortcomings.
Kobblehead
RealGM
Posts: 40,844
And1: 20,003
Joined: Apr 15, 2010
 

Re: Welcome Shake Milton 

Post#44 » by Kobblehead » Wed Jun 27, 2018 11:54 pm

I think Shake Milton is the type of dude that might not even be athletic enough to play in the NBA. But if he can compete athletically, at this level, he'd have starter's upside given his IQ, shooting skill, length and defensive instincts. I view him kinda like an all-or-nothing guy.

Shamet's 1 way game doesn't give him great optimism as a starter, but he has a way higher probability of sticking in the league as a rotation player given his sufficient degree of athleticism.
PhilasFinest
RealGM
Posts: 14,640
And1: 3,581
Joined: Mar 13, 2007
     

Re: Welcome Shake Milton 

Post#45 » by PhilasFinest » Thu Jun 28, 2018 3:44 am

Can Milton fill the early Spur George Hill role for us?

If so, that would be excellent.
SparksFly87 wrote:Towns got boat feet and gets off the ground very slow with a lack of explosiveness . He is a rich mans Henry Sims to me. No thanks .
MR28
Starter
Posts: 2,370
And1: 1,553
Joined: Jun 22, 2016
       

Re: Welcome Shake Milton 

Post#46 » by MR28 » Sun Jul 1, 2018 12:38 pm

Read on Twitter
CoreyGallagher
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,137
And1: 12,928
Joined: Feb 02, 2012
Contact:

Re: Welcome Shake Milton 

Post#47 » by CoreyGallagher » Sun Jul 1, 2018 12:59 pm

Well, that explains why he fell then. Need at least one rookie to redshirt for us.
CoreyGallagher wrote:I hope the Cavs don't take Embiid because then we'll take Embiid.
mithrandir17
Veteran
Posts: 2,908
And1: 1,678
Joined: Jan 30, 2017
 

Re: Welcome Shake Milton 

Post#48 » by mithrandir17 » Sun Jul 1, 2018 3:41 pm

I can already see Shake winning the ROY award next year and sixers haters will whine about how he is not a true rookie too
thenbaman
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,951
And1: 537
Joined: Dec 01, 2008
 

Re: Welcome Shake Milton 

Post#49 » by thenbaman » Sun Jul 1, 2018 4:33 pm

what a shocker
Kobblehead
RealGM
Posts: 40,844
And1: 20,003
Joined: Apr 15, 2010
 

Re: Welcome Shake Milton 

Post#50 » by Kobblehead » Wed Aug 1, 2018 3:56 pm

So Shake officially signed a two-way contract.
ankle420breaker
General Manager
Posts: 9,051
And1: 2,092
Joined: Sep 21, 2005
Location: South Jersey

Re: RE: Re: Welcome Shake Milton 

Post#51 » by ankle420breaker » Wed Aug 1, 2018 4:47 pm

Kobblehead wrote:So Shake officially signed a two-way contract.
Exactly what I was hoping we'd do with him. Nice upside prospect to have develop in Deleware and get the occasional call up. We'll see if he can make a case to break into the 15 man roster by next year.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
User avatar
Lovetron Joe
Rookie
Posts: 1,157
And1: 488
Joined: Dec 26, 2014
       

Re: Welcome Shake Milton 

Post#52 » by Lovetron Joe » Wed Aug 1, 2018 9:17 pm

thenbaman wrote:what a shocker


He played for SMU, not Wichita State.
Chris76
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,969
And1: 318
Joined: May 06, 2017
   

Re: RE: Re: Welcome Shake Milton 

Post#53 » by Chris76 » Wed Aug 1, 2018 11:51 pm

ankle420breaker wrote:
Kobblehead wrote:So Shake officially signed a two-way contract.
Exactly what I was hoping we'd do with him. Nice upside prospect to have develop in Deleware and get the occasional call up. We'll see if he can make a case to break into the 15 man roster by next year.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk


Shake, Shamet, Korkmaz, and Zhaire give us some long skinny shooters to develop. It could pay off greatly in the future.
User avatar
51X3RF4N
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,159
And1: 935
Joined: Feb 14, 2008
       

Re: Welcome Shake Milton 

Post#54 » by 51X3RF4N » Tue Dec 4, 2018 1:01 pm

Anyone know if this kid is any good at defense? Is there a reason, other than his status as a Rookie and injury he sustained earlier in the offseason, that he isn't being plugged into the lineup as another shooter/scoring wing?
Your Future Sixers

C- Embiid/?
PF- ?/?
SF- ?/?
SG- ?/?
PG- ?/?
Sixerscan
Senior Mod - 76ers
Senior Mod - 76ers
Posts: 33,946
And1: 16,328
Joined: Jan 25, 2005

Re: Welcome Shake Milton 

Post#55 » by Sixerscan » Tue Dec 4, 2018 1:16 pm

51X3RF4N wrote:Anyone know if this kid is any good at defense? Is there a reason, other than his status as a Rookie and injury he sustained earlier in the offseason, that he isn't being plugged into the lineup as another shooter/scoring wing?


Well for one he’s on a 2 way deal so he only gets 45 days up with the team.

Can we really expect him to be much better than Korkmaz right now? Korkmaz probably isn’t even long for the rotation assuming we get a buyout guy.
youngcrev
RealGM
Posts: 28,785
And1: 9,699
Joined: Jun 12, 2005
Location: Philadelphia(ish)
   

Re: Welcome Shake Milton 

Post#56 » by youngcrev » Tue Dec 4, 2018 3:35 pm

Sixerscan wrote:
51X3RF4N wrote:Anyone know if this kid is any good at defense? Is there a reason, other than his status as a Rookie and injury he sustained earlier in the offseason, that he isn't being plugged into the lineup as another shooter/scoring wing?


Well for one he’s on a 2 way deal so he only gets 45 days up with the team.

Can we really expect him to be much better than Korkmaz right now? Korkmaz probably isn’t even long for the rotation assuming we get a buyout guy.


Assuming they eventually make some moves to get some depth in here, it doesn't seem like the worst time to burn through some of those days.
User avatar
51X3RF4N
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,159
And1: 935
Joined: Feb 14, 2008
       

Re: Welcome Shake Milton 

Post#57 » by 51X3RF4N » Tue Dec 4, 2018 8:41 pm

Sixerscan wrote:
51X3RF4N wrote:Anyone know if this kid is any good at defense? Is there a reason, other than his status as a Rookie and injury he sustained earlier in the offseason, that he isn't being plugged into the lineup as another shooter/scoring wing?


Well for one he’s on a 2 way deal so he only gets 45 days up with the team.

Can we really expect him to be much better than Korkmaz right now? Korkmaz probably isn’t even long for the rotation assuming we get a buyout guy.
Well I meant defensively, is he any good? That's the only reason I could see not bringing him up to get some burn. He's a sharpshooting 6'6 wing. Can he defend PGs and SGs? If so, he should be in the rotation already.
Your Future Sixers

C- Embiid/?
PF- ?/?
SF- ?/?
SG- ?/?
PG- ?/?
LloydFree
RealGM
Posts: 15,840
And1: 11,657
Joined: Aug 20, 2012
Location: Somewhere near the Jersey Turnpike, between exit 4 and 15E

Re: Welcome Shake Milton 

Post#58 » by LloydFree » Tue Dec 4, 2018 9:02 pm

youngcrev wrote:
Sixerscan wrote:
51X3RF4N wrote:Anyone know if this kid is any good at defense? Is there a reason, other than his status as a Rookie and injury he sustained earlier in the offseason, that he isn't being plugged into the lineup as another shooter/scoring wing?


Well for one he’s on a 2 way deal so he only gets 45 days up with the team.

Can we really expect him to be much better than Korkmaz right now? Korkmaz probably isn’t even long for the rotation assuming we get a buyout guy.


Assuming they eventually make some moves to get some depth in here, it doesn't seem like the worst time to burn through some of those days.

But they don't want to "burn through his days". That's the point of having a 2-way player. They don't want to have to make a decision on him for a full minimum contract until they absolutely have to do that. Either way, that doesn't impact whether he gets time on the court. If he's dressed and with the team, his days add to his 45, whether he plays or not.
Fischella wrote:I think none of you guys that are pro-Embiid no how basketball works today.. is way easier to win it all with Omer Asik than Olajuwon.
Actually if you ask me which Center I want for my perfect championship caliber team, I will chose Asik hands down
youngcrev
RealGM
Posts: 28,785
And1: 9,699
Joined: Jun 12, 2005
Location: Philadelphia(ish)
   

Re: Welcome Shake Milton 

Post#59 » by youngcrev » Tue Dec 4, 2018 11:37 pm

LloydFree wrote:
youngcrev wrote:
Sixerscan wrote:
Well for one he’s on a 2 way deal so he only gets 45 days up with the team.

Can we really expect him to be much better than Korkmaz right now? Korkmaz probably isn’t even long for the rotation assuming we get a buyout guy.


Assuming they eventually make some moves to get some depth in here, it doesn't seem like the worst time to burn through some of those days.

But they don't want to "burn through his days". That's the point of having a 2-way player. They don't want to have to make a decision on him for a full minimum contract until they absolutely have to do that. Either way, that doesn't impact whether he gets time on the court. If he's dressed and with the team, his days add to his 45, whether he plays or not.


Huh? I'm saying they could potentially use him right now because of how thin they are, not burn through them as in waste them. They've got like 9 healthy players on the roster. And we're assuming at some point they will make a move or two to improve the depth, which would mean less of an opportunity for him to play.
Negrodamus
RealGM
Posts: 26,641
And1: 17,250
Joined: Aug 05, 2004

Re: Welcome Shake Milton 

Post#60 » by Negrodamus » Sun Dec 30, 2018 1:00 pm



Shake is getting much better around the rim compared to college.

Return to Philadelphia 76ers