ImageImageImage

Fantasy Trade Thread

Moderators: BullyKing, HartfordWhalers, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan

the_process
RealGM
Posts: 29,283
And1: 10,387
Joined: May 01, 2010

Re: Fantasy Trade Thread 

Post#421 » by the_process » Thu Nov 9, 2017 3:37 pm

skones wrote:
the_process wrote:
skones wrote:If you guys are in the thick of things come December, what would you think about dealing bit parts for George Hill?

17-18: 20M
18-19: 19M
19-20: 18M (Only 1M Guaranteed)


Let me rephrase. Why are you curious if Philadelphia would be interested in trading for Sacramento’s PG?


I think there's room for Milwaukee to bolster their front line with Koufos, Philly to get a good fit piece in Hill to play off Embiid and Simmons while playing mentor to Fultz for a season and a half while he matures, and Sacramento to go full in on the tank while getting a flyer piece in a guy like Okafor. Obviously if you think Hill's play this season is a reflection of actual player production as opposed to a product of his environment, it's a no go, but if you think he's George Hill of last year in a better situation, I hardly find his caliber of player as some sort of slap in the face addition.


So what’s your proposal? I don’t see anything going out from Milwaukee there.
BullyKing
Forum Mod - 76ers
Forum Mod - 76ers
Posts: 13,441
And1: 14,114
Joined: Jan 16, 2014

Re: Fantasy Trade Thread 

Post#422 » by BullyKing » Thu Nov 9, 2017 3:44 pm

skones wrote:
BullyKing wrote:
skones wrote:
Milwaukee has no need for Hill with Bledsoe in the fold and I think he's a good stop gap fit for Philly. It's not about being "stuck" with anyone. What I'm mostly "shocked" about is how "obviously" perturbed at the mere suggestion you are. Obviously a highly offensive question.


You shouldn't be surprised that people react negatively when you ask if they would be interested in a player, they explain that they're saving their cap space for next season (which should be obvious to just about anyone that saw what the Sixers have done since the end of last season) and then respond by saying they're not a legitimate free agent destination.

But fine, I'll play along. Hill is making $20 million this season. All of the Sixers remaining cap space will be spent on Covington in six days. So how are the Sixers matching Hill's salary? Okafor is 5, where's the other 15 million coming from?


I'm a Milwaukee fan, and I don't respond negatively to that ever, because I'm realistic about where my franchise currently sits on the totem pole. I'm just really not interested in discussing with you any further.


So I'll take that as you had not thought through the need to match salaries and have no answer. And I also think this is a huge cop-out on your part. Just two years ago Milwaukee landed what was thought to be a free agent coup at the time in Monroe so if it was realistic two years ago for Milwaukee to land a max free agent then Philly is certainly high enough on your totem poll to do likewise.
NYSixersFan wrote:
the plan is to get as good as quickly as possible....I fully believe we could have been a borderline playoff team last year by adding young veterans....using or draft picks and cap space.....can I specifically tell you who? no.
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

Re: Fantasy Trade Thread 

Post#423 » by skones » Thu Nov 9, 2017 3:47 pm

BullyKing wrote:
skones wrote:
BullyKing wrote:
You shouldn't be surprised that people react negatively when you ask if they would be interested in a player, they explain that they're saving their cap space for next season (which should be obvious to just about anyone that saw what the Sixers have done since the end of last season) and then respond by saying they're not a legitimate free agent destination.

But fine, I'll play along. Hill is making $20 million this season. All of the Sixers remaining cap space will be spent on Covington in six days. So how are the Sixers matching Hill's salary? Okafor is 5, where's the other 15 million coming from?


I'm a Milwaukee fan, and I don't respond negatively to that ever, because I'm realistic about where my franchise currently sits on the totem pole. I'm just really not interested in discussing with you any further.


So I'll take that as you had not thought through the need to match salaries and have no answer. And I also think this is a huge cop-out on your part. Just two years ago Milwaukee landed what was thought to be a free agent coup at the time in Monroe so if it was realistic two years ago for Milwaukee to land a max free agent then Philly is certainly high enough on your totem poll to do likewise.


Greg Monroe is very different than a legitimate star. In fact, Greg Monroe, at the time, is the same caliber player of George Hill, so you're not making some sort of grandiose point here.
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

Re: Fantasy Trade Thread 

Post#424 » by skones » Thu Nov 9, 2017 3:48 pm

the_process wrote:
skones wrote:
the_process wrote:
Let me rephrase. Why are you curious if Philadelphia would be interested in trading for Sacramento’s PG?


I think there's room for Milwaukee to bolster their front line with Koufos, Philly to get a good fit piece in Hill to play off Embiid and Simmons while playing mentor to Fultz for a season and a half while he matures, and Sacramento to go full in on the tank while getting a flyer piece in a guy like Okafor. Obviously if you think Hill's play this season is a reflection of actual player production as opposed to a product of his environment, it's a no go, but if you think he's George Hill of last year in a better situation, I hardly find his caliber of player as some sort of slap in the face addition.


So what’s your proposal? I don’t see anything going out from Milwaukee there.


Milwaukee Sends Snell for Koufos
Sacramento Sends Hill and Koufos for Bayless, Snell, Jah
Philly Sends Bayless and Jah for Hill
BullyKing
Forum Mod - 76ers
Forum Mod - 76ers
Posts: 13,441
And1: 14,114
Joined: Jan 16, 2014

Re: Fantasy Trade Thread 

Post#425 » by BullyKing » Thu Nov 9, 2017 3:52 pm

skones wrote:
BullyKing wrote:
skones wrote:
I'm a Milwaukee fan, and I don't respond negatively to that ever, because I'm realistic about where my franchise currently sits on the totem pole. I'm just really not interested in discussing with you any further.


So I'll take that as you had not thought through the need to match salaries and have no answer. And I also think this is a huge cop-out on your part. Just two years ago Milwaukee landed what was thought to be a free agent coup at the time in Monroe so if it was realistic two years ago for Milwaukee to land a max free agent then Philly is certainly high enough on your totem poll to do likewise.


Greg Monroe is very different than a legitimate star. In fact, Greg Monroe, at the time, is the same caliber player of George Hill, so you're not making some sort of grandiose point here.


Revisionist history

https://www.si.com/nba/2015/07/02/greg-monroe-milwaukee-bucks-free-agency-grades

Reports differ as to what Monroe was offered by which teams, though the final verdict is clear: A big-name, big-money free agent shrugged off New York and Los Angeles to sign with an up-and-coming team in Milwaukee
NYSixersFan wrote:
the plan is to get as good as quickly as possible....I fully believe we could have been a borderline playoff team last year by adding young veterans....using or draft picks and cap space.....can I specifically tell you who? no.
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

Re: Fantasy Trade Thread 

Post#426 » by skones » Thu Nov 9, 2017 3:57 pm

BullyKing wrote:
skones wrote:
BullyKing wrote:
So I'll take that as you had not thought through the need to match salaries and have no answer. And I also think this is a huge cop-out on your part. Just two years ago Milwaukee landed what was thought to be a free agent coup at the time in Monroe so if it was realistic two years ago for Milwaukee to land a max free agent then Philly is certainly high enough on your totem poll to do likewise.


Greg Monroe is very different than a legitimate star. In fact, Greg Monroe, at the time, is the same caliber player of George Hill, so you're not making some sort of grandiose point here.


Revisionist history

https://www.si.com/nba/2015/07/02/greg-monroe-milwaukee-bucks-free-agency-grades

Reports differ as to what Monroe was offered by which teams, though the final verdict is clear: A big-name, big-money free agent shrugged off New York and Los Angeles to sign with an up-and-coming team in Milwaukee


It's not revisionist history. Name and dollars involved in 2015 doesn't make a case for anyone thinking he was some bonafide all-star caliber player. People act like shrugging off NY and LA was a big deal. It's not. Those teams were garbage. That's why they were shrugged off. This misconception that markets make teams some sort of free agency destination is so off base. That's not how the NBA works.
the_process
RealGM
Posts: 29,283
And1: 10,387
Joined: May 01, 2010

Re: Fantasy Trade Thread 

Post#427 » by the_process » Thu Nov 9, 2017 4:11 pm

skones wrote:
the_process wrote:
skones wrote:
I think there's room for Milwaukee to bolster their front line with Koufos, Philly to get a good fit piece in Hill to play off Embiid and Simmons while playing mentor to Fultz for a season and a half while he matures, and Sacramento to go full in on the tank while getting a flyer piece in a guy like Okafor. Obviously if you think Hill's play this season is a reflection of actual player production as opposed to a product of his environment, it's a no go, but if you think he's George Hill of last year in a better situation, I hardly find his caliber of player as some sort of slap in the face addition.


So what’s your proposal? I don’t see anything going out from Milwaukee there.


Milwaukee Sends Snell for Koufos
Sacramento Sends Hill and Koufos for Bayless, Snell, Jah
Philly Sends Bayless and Jah for Hill


Snell is like one of the only shooters you guys have, though. But if you’re okay with dealing him, maybe SAC does Koufos for Snell straight up? SAC doesn't need a replacement C, they have a bunch of big bodies. ZBo, Skal, Freak’s dad, WCS, and Harry Giles. But if Sacto’s motivation here is simply to move Hill’s $$$, then the Sixers aren’t the best place. Yes, in a vacuum Hill>Bayless. But it’s not a vacuum. One makes 9M and the other makes 20M. The opportunity cost is far too high to pull the trigger.
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

Re: Fantasy Trade Thread 

Post#428 » by skones » Thu Nov 9, 2017 4:24 pm

the_process wrote:
skones wrote:
the_process wrote:
So what’s your proposal? I don’t see anything going out from Milwaukee there.


Milwaukee Sends Snell for Koufos
Sacramento Sends Hill and Koufos for Bayless, Snell, Jah
Philly Sends Bayless and Jah for Hill


Snell is like one of the only shooters you guys have, though. But if you’re okay with dealing him, maybe SAC does Koufos for Snell straight up? SAC doesn't need a replacement C, they have a bunch of big bodies. ZBo, Skal, Freak’s dad, WCS, and Harry Giles. But if Sacto’s motivation here is simply to move Hill’s $$$, then the Sixers aren’t the best place. Yes, in a vacuum Hill>Bayless. But it’s not a vacuum. One makes 9M and the other makes 20M. The opportunity cost is far too high to pull the trigger.


Sacramento needs all the flyer talent they can get their hands on. Nobody is watching Skal, Papagiannis, and WCS right now thinking, "Oh, we're definitely set for the future."

As far as the money involved, my line of thinking was more or less Hill >>>> Bayless (I guess you guys haven't really seen Bayless play for an extended period of time, he's a super super frustrating player that many of us in Milwaukee grew to loathe), and you're looking at a difference of 5M this year and 10M next for a pretty clear substantial upgrade. On top of that, Hill's trade prospects will be ideal with that NGd third year during the 2018 offseason/season. He can be treated as an expiring deal during next season, or as a guy who's around to help for two years at a team's discretion. I don't think 10M is "too high" an opportunity cost, but if it's not your bag, it's not your bag.
the_process
RealGM
Posts: 29,283
And1: 10,387
Joined: May 01, 2010

Re: Fantasy Trade Thread 

Post#429 » by the_process » Thu Nov 9, 2017 4:37 pm

skones wrote:
the_process wrote:
skones wrote:
Milwaukee Sends Snell for Koufos
Sacramento Sends Hill and Koufos for Bayless, Snell, Jah
Philly Sends Bayless and Jah for Hill


Snell is like one of the only shooters you guys have, though. But if you’re okay with dealing him, maybe SAC does Koufos for Snell straight up? SAC doesn't need a replacement C, they have a bunch of big bodies. ZBo, Skal, Freak’s dad, WCS, and Harry Giles. But if Sacto’s motivation here is simply to move Hill’s $$$, then the Sixers aren’t the best place. Yes, in a vacuum Hill>Bayless. But it’s not a vacuum. One makes 9M and the other makes 20M. The opportunity cost is far too high to pull the trigger.


Sacramento needs all the flyer talent they can get their hands on. Nobody is watching Skal, Papagiannis, and WCS right now thinking, "Oh, we're definitely set for the future."

As far as the money involved, my line of thinking was more or less Hill >>>> Bayless(I guess you guys haven't really seen Bayless play for an extended period of time, he's a super super frustrating player that many of us in Milwaukee grew to loathe), and you're looking at a difference of 5M this year and 10M next for a pretty clear substantial upgrade. On top of that, Hill's trade prospects will be ideal with that NGd third year during the 2018 offseason/season. He can be treated as an expiring deal during next season, or as a guy who's around to help for two years at a team's discretion. I don't think 10M is "too high" an opportunity cost, but if it's not your bag, it's not your bag.


If that’s the case, why would Sacto want to dump Hill’s money and take on Bayless’? They should be fine with Snell for Koufos and keeping Hill; and if they also want to take a flier on some other young guys at the same time, I don’t think any Sixer fans would object to Jah and Stauskas for VC (plus it would be really funny sending Sauce back to Sacto).
the_process
RealGM
Posts: 29,283
And1: 10,387
Joined: May 01, 2010

Re: Fantasy Trade Thread 

Post#430 » by the_process » Thu Nov 9, 2017 4:40 pm

Jah and Sauce Castillo to Sacramento for Vince Carter.
Negrodamus
RealGM
Posts: 26,538
And1: 17,102
Joined: Aug 05, 2004

Re: Fantasy Trade Thread 

Post#431 » by Negrodamus » Thu Nov 9, 2017 8:52 pm

Jah for Kyle Singler, Dakari Johnson, the rights to PJ Dozier, and a second rounder.
KrazySixersD
General Manager
Posts: 9,779
And1: 1,008
Joined: Jul 16, 2008

Re: Fantasy Trade Thread 

Post#432 » by KrazySixersD » Fri Nov 10, 2017 6:28 pm

let me first say I have no idea if this has merit or not, but a friend of mine who is a magic fan claims that one of their insiders said the following:

sixers and magic have discussed okafor and anderson for Hezonja... not sure at all if true, and not sure why we would have to also add anderson in it..

but take it as u will
User avatar
ProcessDoctor
RealGM
Posts: 11,566
And1: 6,336
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
   

Re: Fantasy Trade Thread 

Post#433 » by ProcessDoctor » Fri Nov 10, 2017 6:57 pm

KrazySixersD wrote:let me first say I have no idea if this has merit or not, but a friend of mine who is a magic fan claims that one of their insiders said the following:

sixers and magic have discussed okafor and anderson for Hezonja... not sure at all if true, and not sure why we would have to also add anderson in it..

but take it as u will


Hmm...interesting. The challenge with bringing Mario over is that he's in the same contract situation as OK4. Not sure if I wanna use any money on him next summer.
2025-2026 Philadelphia 76ers:

Maxey/McCain/Lowry
Grimes/Edgecombe/Gordon
Oubre/Edwards
George/Watford/Barlow
Embiid/Bona/Drummond/Broome
Kobblehead
RealGM
Posts: 40,844
And1: 20,001
Joined: Apr 15, 2010
 

Re: Fantasy Trade Thread 

Post#434 » by Kobblehead » Fri Nov 10, 2017 8:57 pm

I like Justin on the roster as a deep reserve, but I suppose he won't be necessary next year with Luwawu and Korkmaz (hopefully) taking the next step and a couple of incoming rookie contract players from the 2018 draft that might be at the G and F positions.
the_process
RealGM
Posts: 29,283
And1: 10,387
Joined: May 01, 2010

Re: Fantasy Trade Thread 

Post#435 » by the_process » Sat Nov 11, 2017 3:27 pm

KrazySixersD wrote:let me first say I have no idea if this has merit or not, but a friend of mine who is a magic fan claims that one of their insiders said the following:

sixers and magic have discussed okafor and anderson for Hezonja... not sure at all if true, and not sure why we would have to also add anderson in it..

but take it as u will


Make the Magic take Sauce instead of Anderson if we’re just giving away freebies.
Ericb5
RealGM
Posts: 10,303
And1: 3,377
Joined: Jan 08, 2014
       

Re: Fantasy Trade Thread 

Post#436 » by Ericb5 » Sat Nov 11, 2017 6:14 pm

the_process wrote:
KrazySixersD wrote:let me first say I have no idea if this has merit or not, but a friend of mine who is a magic fan claims that one of their insiders said the following:

sixers and magic have discussed okafor and anderson for Hezonja... not sure at all if true, and not sure why we would have to also add anderson in it..

but take it as u will


Make the Magic take Sauce instead of Anderson if we’re just giving away freebies.


That would be pretty funny if Okafor and Noel turned into a second round pick and a severely discounted Hezonja.

The number one negative that has to be pinned on Bryan since he has been here is that he blew the value of those two guys. Hinkie would have traded one of them at the draft, and the other one sometime either later that summer or early the following season. Bryan would have NEVER been able to trade MCW for what Hinkie got for him.

The Fultz trade is too early to grade so I’m not counting that for or against Bryan yet.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
smittybanton
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,766
And1: 398
Joined: Jul 30, 2016

Re: Fantasy Trade Thread 

Post#437 » by smittybanton » Sat Nov 11, 2017 7:52 pm

KrazySixersD wrote:let me first say I have no idea if this has merit or not, but a friend of mine who is a magic fan claims that one of their insiders said the following:

sixers and magic have discussed okafor and anderson for Hezonja... not sure at all if true, and not sure why we would have to also add anderson in it..

but take it as u will


That'd be appropriate, considering I was on LB back then, and the vast majority of dudes there claiming to be down with "analytics" wanted Mario Hezonja badly.

I'd take it. Although I still don't see any 'grit'. Korkmaz is a better bet. Playing them together on the wings in the second unit along with TLC could be interesting though.
spikeslovechild
RealGM
Posts: 12,843
And1: 6,198
Joined: Dec 16, 2013
Location: Right here waiting for you

Re: Fantasy Trade Thread 

Post#438 » by spikeslovechild » Sun Nov 12, 2017 2:40 pm

sixers238 wrote:
KrazySixersD wrote:let me first say I have no idea if this has merit or not, but a friend of mine who is a magic fan claims that one of their insiders said the following:

sixers and magic have discussed okafor and anderson for Hezonja... not sure at all if true, and not sure why we would have to also add anderson in it..

but take it as u will


Hmm...interesting. The challenge with bringing Mario over is that he's in the same contract situation as OK4. Not sure if I wanna use any money on him next summer.


First of all I'm not making that deal without picks. Two, why would ORL want Okafor they have Vuc and Biyombo.
LloydFree
RealGM
Posts: 15,839
And1: 11,656
Joined: Aug 20, 2012
Location: Somewhere near the Jersey Turnpike, between exit 4 and 15E

Re: Fantasy Trade Thread 

Post#439 » by LloydFree » Sun Nov 12, 2017 4:09 pm

Negrodamus wrote:Jah for Kyle Singler, Dakari Johnson, the rights to PJ Dozier, and a second rounder.

Embiid's eyes would probably light up with the chance to smash Dakari in practice. He was Embiid's teammate at Montverde when they used to laugh at him about his play.
Fischella wrote:I think none of you guys that are pro-Embiid no how basketball works today.. is way easier to win it all with Omer Asik than Olajuwon.
Actually if you ask me which Center I want for my perfect championship caliber team, I will chose Asik hands down
LloydFree
RealGM
Posts: 15,839
And1: 11,656
Joined: Aug 20, 2012
Location: Somewhere near the Jersey Turnpike, between exit 4 and 15E

Re: Fantasy Trade Thread 

Post#440 » by LloydFree » Sun Nov 12, 2017 4:51 pm

Rumored the Cavs are interested in Greg Monroe.
Cavs-Suns-76ers:

Cavs out: Shumpert, Frye and a 2nd.
Cavs In: Greg Monroe

Suns out: Greg Monroe
Suns In: Okafor and Jeryd Bayless

76ers out: Okafor and Bayless
76ers In: Shumpert, Frye and Cavs 2nd.

The 76ers upgrade the defensive versatility of their starting guards without adding much salary, moving Bayless for Shumpert. Strengthens the starting lineups defensive upside potential.
Fischella wrote:I think none of you guys that are pro-Embiid no how basketball works today.. is way easier to win it all with Omer Asik than Olajuwon.
Actually if you ask me which Center I want for my perfect championship caliber team, I will chose Asik hands down

Return to Philadelphia 76ers