Kobblehead wrote:DCasey91 wrote:Kobblehead wrote:That doesn't change the fact that Simmons is a terrible playoff player on a $30m+ contract that teams will keep hacking and sending to the line, ruining any flow and offensive momentum we ever have. Simmons has to go, I thought we realized this.
It doesn’t change the fact that Harris has a horrible contract can’t get to the line and is not a great scorer and can’t be good enough to be the second option.
He’s getting paid closer to 40$ mill.
Mr.Harris really does get a free pass somehow.
The biggest problem has always been his contract.
Destroys any type of cap or asset flexibility on the team.
Who cares if Harris isn't great or is overpaid? He's still better and more impactful than Ben. We can have a conversation about moving Harris once we cut the deadweight that is Simmons. Ben is way worse than Tobias. And his contract is way worse. And he's way less playable in the playoffs.
1. Harris is not more impactful then Ben. Two sides to play offense/defense. Ben has been solid on both sides, look what happened when he didn’t play. Our team perimeter defense and team facilitating was null in-void. Ben rocks a pretty good Ortg, and Drtg.
Harris has been bog average on both sides.
2. Harris @ 40 mill... or CJ + 21 mil saved.
3. Everybody hates Ben fine. Look at his contract. It’s top 30 or higher. At minimum it’s neutral to positive, age and environment factored in. Solo or functioning backcourt. Boom value restored overnight. He was runner up for DPOY for ffs.
Package Ben for a star, not Brogdon and a non top ten pick that’s silly stuff. Have a look at what Brogdon really is (bad durability, bad defender) and you’d say auto no too and move on.
4. Harris wasn’t on the table for a superstar... Ben was.
NO BRAIN energy to figure out which will be better for us in the long run.