HotelVitale wrote:DCasey91 wrote:HotelVitale wrote:
There was more or less just one full calendar year of catastrophic moves the FO made, BC and B-B share the blame. Fultz trade, Butler trade then walking, Tobias trade then max, Horford signing, Zhaire Smith trade. Blew pretty much all of our considerable assets and left us capped out without a second star, and ready to be f’d when Simmons fell apart. We walked out of that series of moves minus 5 1st rd picks (and a cheap Covington who was worth at least one more) and with Tobias on a giant contract. And Seth curry and Danny Green for a minute too I guess (yay!).
I’m not a huge Morey guy but I think he’s competent and that he and most GMs probably wouldn’t have done any of those moves, let alone all of them. So I don’t think it makes sense to sideswipe the ‘FO’ as a whole. Process was well set up, Morey’s made the roster make more sense. But that year was just a brutal stretch and we’re walking through the wreckage now. Gotta be both lucky and good to field a champ team and we were both pretty unlucky and pretty crap after the Process set the table.
100% agree well said. The only caveat I’d add is we ourselves made the luck as worse as possible. The biggest head scratcher to me wasn’t the Fultz/Simmons debacle it was the Bridges scenario. We needed a wing and a PG and it was the worst possible time to double down on a project. The timeline made no sense then as it does now. Yeah Ben made Shai look redundant in the sense that the FO was sticking to the wrong gun which was proven to be wrong but that’s happened before but Bridges? Didn’t understand it then still don’t now. Ready made and ready to go with a pro game, homegrown the whole works.
Tin foil but whatever I seriously think there’s some sour things going on away from the public eye. There’s still sour grapes in the org imho.
At the very least we’d be 2/5 on the starting positions long term instead of 1/5.
Well my counter to that would be that I was actually working at Villanova at the time and watched a lot of Bridges, and I loved him as a college player but didn’t think he was a guaranteed solid starter in the NBA—let alone what he was on PHX (probably the best 3D guy ever), let alone what he’s become this year. I think it’s just a hindsight take to think that everyone could’ve penciled him in as a major cog in the machine at draft time; to my eyes he was a really good but flawed 3D prospect, and those guys fail or disappoint a lot.
I also think we got a terrific return—the issue is just that we drafted a rough prospect with one pick and then traded the other in the Tobias deal. Zhaire Smith and 30% of the right to max Tobias Harris is an awful return for a prospect like Bridges, even if two picks in the teens for a #10 isn’t bad.
It’s funny because I followed that draft very closely as a byproduct of Luka. Luka was a clear number one and it wasn’t Euroleague play that didn’t surprise me it was actually Eurocup when Slovenia won with an in form Dragic. Zingis was the player of the tourney but Luka was clearly the most talented one there even back then lol. Thought he’d be a bigger Hayward but cleared that easy
Fwiw I had Carter Jr over Bagley as he always seemed to have a more transferable game when they played together it’s the same thing with Bridges and it’s my number one thing I look when envisioning prospects on their role at the next level. The polish, the feel, the transferability. Bridge’s shooting that season was legit and consistent the whole time.
Did I think he could average 15+? No but scoring is inflated to the max in the NBA. But I really thought he was plug in and play and was an easy fit on any team.
The thing that soured me the most was how it was handled on draft day. Even Mikal was shocked.
In reality pick 16 is pretty spot on for the range on Zhaire but it wasn’t what we needed at the time.