Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan
Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
- Mik317
- RealGM
- Posts: 41,299
- And1: 19,930
- Joined: May 31, 2005
- Location: In Spain...without the S
-
Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
Chris Sheridan got kicked off of ESPN for being a hack.
He pretty recently wrote and article that more or less hinted he'd like to **** Glen Taylor's wife.
Dude is a hasbeen at best right now. If you wish to die on that hill then by all means have fun.
He pretty recently wrote and article that more or less hinted he'd like to **** Glen Taylor's wife.
Dude is a hasbeen at best right now. If you wish to die on that hill then by all means have fun.
#NeverGonnaBeGood
Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
-
- Senior Mod - 76ers
- Posts: 33,946
- And1: 16,327
- Joined: Jan 25, 2005
Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
Hey, any idea if Chris Sheridan or Rob Tornoe get paid for writing articles? Are they incentivized to drive traffic to a website by having controversial opinions? Or does that only matter when the media person is pro Hinkie? Please advise.
Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
- Chamberlainship
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,684
- And1: 213
- Joined: Jun 12, 2012
Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
HartfordWhalers wrote:Chamberlainship wrote:HartfordWhalers wrote:
If it hurts to hear, I'm sorry.
You don't have to apologize. Just stop with the "you've got a problem that's a lot deeper than basketball." Seems like that is projecting some insecurity there. We're arguing about how to guage the popularity of a sixer GM who resigned. Let's keep that in perspective.
No, at this point you are defending that Chris Sheridan is a legitimate respected NBA analyst because you want it to be so to suit an agenda. Its a horrible tangential position. Trying to obscure from that is missing the point. You have jumped the train. Which is funny with all the comments about 'cults'.
You don't like Sheridan. I can find others. When Hinkie's letter hit, it seemed like the whole world was looking away in embarrassment for him. He didn't seem like Mr. Popularity that day. Now there are a lot of people who like him. But I think some of them may be a little red in the face about how he left and have some angst about that.
At this point we've been arguing for two days about whether Hinkie was popular and how to guage that. I think I'm going to let it go. this argument has degenerated. But I don't concede that ive "jumped the train" . . . (Is that a Boston saying?)
You're welcome to have the last word and use an ellipsis or eye role to suggest I'm an idiot.
No to Jeff Teague btw.
Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
- Stanford
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 53,620
- And1: 18,867
- Joined: Feb 07, 2005
- Location: Parts Unknown
-
Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
This 'Hinkie cult' narrative requires a pretty significant lack of awareness. Articles (if this can even be called an article) like this don't take into account just how **** dumb being devoted to a sports franchise is in the first place. Grown men routinely paint the entirety of their exposed flesh in team colors as a way of affecting the outcome of a game they're not participating in. If the team loses, their day/week/month is ruined. If the team wins, they celebrate as if they had something to do with it.
Team fandom is **** stupid. Just ask someone who doesn't like sports. They think we're all nuts.
Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
-
- Senior Mod - 76ers
- Posts: 33,946
- And1: 16,327
- Joined: Jan 25, 2005
Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
Stanford wrote:
This 'Hinkie cult' narrative requires a pretty significant lack of awareness. Articles (if this can even be called an article) like this don't take into account just how **** dumb being devoted to a sports franchise is in the first place. Grown men routinely paint the entirety of their exposed flesh in team colors as a way of affecting the outcome of a game they're not participating in. If the team loses, their day/week/month is ruined. If the team wins, they celebrate as if they had something to do with it.
Team fandom is **** stupid. Just ask someone who doesn't like sports. They think we're all nuts.
It's especially funny coming from someone who has a job covering sports. His livelihood is literally based on people caring too much about this crap when they are not doing other things with their lives.
Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,752
- And1: 3,993
- Joined: Jul 04, 2014
Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
Chamberlainship wrote:Unbreakable99 wrote:Chamberlainship wrote:
I don't understand this comment. I'm not sure what analysts have good reps in your opinion. Is there a philly.com poll I should look at to establish an analyst's popularity? What makes ESPN insider dude such an authority? Nevermind. It isn't worth the time.
You lost. Give it up man.
In who's opinion?
Just about everyone's. You're clearly on the wrong side here. Seriously, stop fighting a losing battle. Quit while you're behind.
Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
-
- Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 47,322
- And1: 20,917
- Joined: Apr 07, 2010
-
Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
Chamberlainship wrote:(Is that a Boston saying?)
This is your what third totally off topic comment about Boston? At this point I cannot help but think less of your (lack of) arguments based upon your inability to not be so easily distracted.
So far we have thousands of fans cheering for Hinke, we have polls on philly.com, tom moore's reporting and Derek Bodner all saying the same thing, and we have well respected national NBA pundits saying Philly downgraded.
On the other hand, there is Chris Sheridan, and look, a Boston logo...
Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,337
- And1: 278
- Joined: Mar 12, 2009
-
Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
HartfordWhalers wrote:Chamberlainship wrote:(Is that a Boston saying?)
This is your what third totally off topic comment about Boston? At this point I cannot help but think less of your (lack of) arguments based upon your inability to not be so easily distracted.
So far we have thousands of fans cheering for Hinke, we have polls on philly.com, tom moore's reporting and Derek Bodner all saying the same thing, and we have well respected national NBA pundits saying Philly downgraded.
On the other hand, there is Chris Sheridan, and look, a Boston logo...
Off topic here a bit but I just realised your Boston Logo, Are you not a Sixers Fan anymore?
Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
- bondom34
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 66,716
- And1: 50,290
- Joined: Mar 01, 2013
Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
Wait, people read Sheridan seriously? I thought people read him like he wrote everything in a white Stephen A. Smith voice.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
- 76ciology
- RealGM
- Posts: 65,948
- And1: 26,915
- Joined: Jun 06, 2002
Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
- Hoops23
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,845
- And1: 1,301
- Joined: Jan 15, 2003
- Location: City of Angels
-
Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
problem with the Noel for Teague deal is, the latter is a unrestricted free agent and Philly cant end up nothing for Noel or whom ever you trade for. Usually free agents wants to play for a winning team.

Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,930
- And1: 705
- Joined: Dec 30, 2013
Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
It's definitely all a hoax. Sam is still in charge.
“This may be one of the best jobs in basketball right now,” Colangelo said at a press conference introducing him as the new GM of the 76ers after Sam Hinkie resigned.
Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
- 76ciology
- RealGM
- Posts: 65,948
- And1: 26,915
- Joined: Jun 06, 2002
Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
Agnostifarian wrote:It's definitely all a hoax. Sam is still in charge.
Same sentiment. But don't let them know.

There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
-
- Forum Mod - 76ers
- Posts: 13,441
- And1: 14,114
- Joined: Jan 16, 2014
Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
Chamberlainship wrote:HartfordWhalers wrote:Chamberlainship wrote:
You don't have to apologize. Just stop with the "you've got a problem that's a lot deeper than basketball." Seems like that is projecting some insecurity there. We're arguing about how to guage the popularity of a sixer GM who resigned. Let's keep that in perspective.
No, at this point you are defending that Chris Sheridan is a legitimate respected NBA analyst because you want it to be so to suit an agenda. Its a horrible tangential position. Trying to obscure from that is missing the point. You have jumped the train. Which is funny with all the comments about 'cults'.
You're welcome to have the last word and use an ellipsis or eye role to suggest I'm an idiot.
If that's the point of the last word, your own words have had that covered for a while now.
NYSixersFan wrote:
the plan is to get as good as quickly as possible....I fully believe we could have been a borderline playoff team last year by adding young veterans....using or draft picks and cap space.....can I specifically tell you who? no.
Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
-
- Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 47,322
- And1: 20,917
- Joined: Apr 07, 2010
-
Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
76ciology wrote:Agnostifarian wrote:It's definitely all a hoax. Sam is still in charge.
Same sentiment. But don't let them know.
I strongly assume that Hinkie's contract goes until June 30th, and while he may no longer work for the team, the team can block him from doing anything with another team.
Wouldn't surprise me to hear talk of him going back to Houston or another team once July 1st hits, but it should be quiet until then.
Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,909
- And1: 492
- Joined: Sep 22, 2005
-
Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
Chamberlainship wrote:Does Okafor for Schroder really seem signature-worthy when we're rumored to be evaluating trading Noel+ for Teague?
But, I am flattered nonetheless. Thanks for the mentions.
Yes. As are the cesspool of quotes in this thread from you lol...and i hate to break it to ya buddy, but just about every poster here has given you legitimate rebuttals to your revisionist and contrarian views. No offense, but i'm glad you (and most ppl here) arent CEOs of a b-ball organization.
Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,752
- And1: 3,993
- Joined: Jul 04, 2014
Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
Oh Barkley. He would do the trade?
[tweet]https://twitter.com/coreyseidmancsn/status/739920867358973953[/tweet]

[tweet]https://twitter.com/coreyseidmancsn/status/739920867358973953[/tweet]
Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
-
- Junior
- Posts: 266
- And1: 80
- Joined: Mar 27, 2015
-
Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
Aussiepiston1 wrote:Sportfan73 wrote:http://www.peachtreehoops.com/2016/6/4/11856520/jeff-teague-trade-kicker-salary-cap-atlanta-hawks?_ga=1.42595047.377536139.1439804783
Would you trade noel for Teague on a 26, 18, 18 ,18 deal? Teague at 18 with the cap going up looks great for next summer
I still think Atlanta would have to throw in the 21st pick plus Minnesota's protected pick which someone said they owned for Noel and Covington. Plus it would have to wait until draft day to see whether or not the player we like is there at #21 or we get a better offer for Noel (#6 from NOH or Brandon Knight and #13 from Phoenix)
Either way there has to be more involved unless Junior has a crystal ball and Teague turns into the next Kyle Lowry and Noel into Robin Lopez
The Minnesota pick is 1-14 protected in 18', 19' and 20'. No big deal since the Wolves should be pretty good.
Re: Re: Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,920
- And1: 1,320
- Joined: Jun 18, 2015
-
Re: Re: Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
Unbreakable99 wrote:Oh Barkley. He would do the trade?![]()
[tweet]https://twitter.com/coreyseidmancsn/status/739920867358973953[/tweet]
If I could get Teague at 26,18,18,18
26 being a restructure of this year. Along with Atlanta 2017 top 3 protected and 21 for Noel and 26 I might just do it.
Re: Re: Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,511
- And1: 446
- Joined: Jun 28, 2010
Re: Re: Re: Jeff Teague for Nerlens Noel discussed, not imminent
Sportfan73 wrote:Unbreakable99 wrote:Oh Barkley. He would do the trade?![]()
[tweet]https://twitter.com/coreyseidmancsn/status/739920867358973953[/tweet]
If I could get Teague at 26,18,18,18
26 being a restructure of this year. Along with Atlanta 2017 top 3 protected and 21 for Noel and 26 I might just do it.
As I understand the CBA rules, that structure - 26, 18, 18, 18 - cannot be done. Yearly salary can only increase a maximum of X% per year. I think X = 7.5%. Conversely yearly salary can decrease a maximum of X% per year.
I'm fuzzy on X = 7.5%, but I know for sure it isn't 30%+ which is the decrease from 26 to 18.
I've always wondered why more contracts weren't front loaded and then I discovered this rule.