Beal should be on top.
Lavine
DeAaron Fox
Package of SGA and picks
Package of Coby White and Lavine.
Package of Sexton and Garland.
Package of DLo and Anthony Edwards.
Package of Terry Rozier and atleast 4 first round picks.
Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan
76ciology wrote:Spoiler:
Beal should be on top.
Lavine
DeAaron Fox
Package of SGA and picks
Package of Coby White and Lavine.
Package of Sexton and Garland.
Package of DLo and Anthony Edwards.
Package of Terry Rozier and atleast 4 first round picks.
Tomjas wrote:76ciology wrote:Spoiler:
Beal should be on top.
Lavine
DeAaron Fox
Package of SGA and picks
Package of Coby White and Lavine.
Package of Sexton and Garland.
Package of DLo and Anthony Edwards.
Package of Terry Rozier and atleast 4 first round picks.
Most of those are awful
Portland should blow it up
CJ & stuff
76ciology wrote:Tomjas wrote:76ciology wrote:Spoiler:
Beal should be on top.
Lavine
DeAaron Fox
Package of SGA and picks
Package of Coby White and Lavine.
Package of Sexton and Garland.
Package of DLo and Anthony Edwards.
Package of Terry Rozier and atleast 4 first round picks.
Most of those are awful
Portland should blow it up
CJ & stuff
That is why I dont think i wont get over it if we dont trade for Harden.
Actually those trades would be good in a year or two. Just as we thought Donovan Mitchell and Jamal Murray were inferior to Ben before.
Tomjas wrote:76ciology wrote:Tomjas wrote:
Most of those are awful
Portland should blow it up
CJ & stuff
That is why I dont think i wont get over it if we dont trade for Harden.
Actually those trades would be good in a year or two. Just as we thought Donovan Mitchell and Jamal Murray were inferior to Ben before.
Mitchell & Murray are still inferior
Harden is a one season thing unless you think that he’s going to be happy in Philly long term
BIG CHANCE that it’s Jimmy 2 with the only upside being that we can trade him
76ciology wrote:Tomjas wrote:76ciology wrote:
That is why I dont think i wont get over it if we dont trade for Harden.
Actually those trades would be good in a year or two. Just as we thought Donovan Mitchell and Jamal Murray were inferior to Ben before.
Mitchell & Murray are still inferior
Harden is a one season thing unless you think that he’s going to be happy in Philly long term
BIG CHANCE that it’s Jimmy 2 with the only upside being that we can trade him
I respect your opinion.
I’ll just say if we have Murray or Mitchell, we wouldn’t have threads of over 100 pages saying how we need a go to guy or a perimeter playmaker. May even not need to trade for Harden.
76ciology wrote:Tomjas wrote:76ciology wrote:
That is why I dont think i wont get over it if we dont trade for Harden.
Actually those trades would be good in a year or two. Just as we thought Donovan Mitchell and Jamal Murray were inferior to Ben before.
Mitchell & Murray are still inferior
Harden is a one season thing unless you think that he’s going to be happy in Philly long term
BIG CHANCE that it’s Jimmy 2 with the only upside being that we can trade him
I respect your opinion.
I’ll just say if we have Murray or Mitchell, we wouldn’t have threads of over 100 pages saying how we need a go to guy or a perimeter playmaker. May even not need to trade for Harden.
youngcrev wrote:There's maybe like 4 players I wouldn't deal Harris for straight up if it was on the table
the_process wrote:youngcrev wrote:There's maybe like 4 players I wouldn't deal Harris for straight up if it was on the table
IDK. 4 might be high. The only big money (25M+) I would reject out of hand is Westbrook, and that’s solely because I hate his game. Anyone else, I’d be willing to negotiate.
youngcrev wrote:There's maybe like 4 players I wouldn't deal Harris for straight up if it was on the table
Fischella wrote:I think none of you guys that are pro-Embiid no how basketball works today.. is way easier to win it all with Omer Asik than Olajuwon.
Actually if you ask me which Center I want for my perfect championship caliber team, I will chose Asik hands down
PhillyPhilly wrote:To the people who are obsessed with moving Harris...can you tell me who replaces his 20ppg please? And then can you tell me who line-ups in the PF and SF positions? Or do you just want to deal him to make yourself feel better because you hated the original trade?
youngcrev wrote:PhillyPhilly wrote:To the people who are obsessed with moving Harris...can you tell me who replaces his 20ppg please? And then can you tell me who line-ups in the PF and SF positions? Or do you just want to deal him to make yourself feel better because you hated the original trade?
If you unpair the contract they gave him from the trade, I didn't hate it (though it was an overpay). The contract is the issue. So when you look at it all together, you basically gave up 2 1sts and a max salary slot to shell out a massive contract to an above average starter...
As for replacing his 20 ppg, other guys would get more shots, and you'd be getting another player back... I don't think it's all that complicated.
Now relax, Shahara.
Kobblehead wrote:As long as the player doesn't have a longer length on his deal, I don't think there's a single trade I wouldn't make for Harris.
PhillyPhilly wrote:Kobblehead wrote:As long as the player doesn't have a longer length on his deal, I don't think there's a single trade I wouldn't make for Harris.
And that's why you're on this forum and have no position in an nba front office.
the_process wrote:Harris back to DET is a solid idea. They have to be hating that Jerami contract already. They should be added to the list of potential trade partners. They might even have the assets for Ben depending on where their pick falls.