ImageImageImage

Markelle Fultz Discussion

Moderators: BullyKing, HartfordWhalers, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan

User avatar
JojoSlimbiid
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,317
And1: 2,239
Joined: Dec 03, 2016
   

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#741 » by JojoSlimbiid » Mon Jul 17, 2017 9:09 pm

Sixerscan wrote:Davis won a national championship...


I could of sworn he was injured for that game. He wasn't, he just had a bad offensive game.
eagereyez
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,991
And1: 4,462
Joined: May 05, 2012
   

Re: RE: Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#742 » by eagereyez » Mon Jul 17, 2017 9:18 pm

JojoSlimbiid wrote:
eagereyez wrote:It warms my heart to see the Prokafor **** teammate excuse being re-used. Transformative talent shouldn't be able to beat down on the elite basketball programs of WSU and TCU, got it.


What kind of garbage is this?

I'm still hoping for answer as to what exactly AD and KAT did in college to warrant being labeled transformative outside of not winning a national championship with the most talented rosters in college basketball. I'll wait.

Not even gonna get into the fact that they really haven't done much in the league outside of put up good stats. Wouldn't say N.O or Minny are transformed but I'll save that topic for another day.

Davis and KAT played defense. They were elite two-way players. They would immediately improve UW's defense by a few standard deviations, whereas Fultz was very much a contributor to UW being one of the worst defenses in D1 basketball.
User avatar
cksdayoff
RealGM
Posts: 13,331
And1: 3,639
Joined: Jun 21, 2010

Re: RE: Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#743 » by cksdayoff » Mon Jul 17, 2017 9:39 pm

eagereyez wrote:
JojoSlimbiid wrote:
eagereyez wrote:It warms my heart to see the Prokafor **** teammate excuse being re-used. Transformative talent shouldn't be able to beat down on the elite basketball programs of WSU and TCU, got it.


What kind of garbage is this?

I'm still hoping for answer as to what exactly AD and KAT did in college to warrant being labeled transformative outside of not winning a national championship with the most talented rosters in college basketball. I'll wait.

Not even gonna get into the fact that they really haven't done much in the league outside of put up good stats. Wouldn't say N.O or Minny are transformed but I'll save that topic for another day.

Davis and KAT played defense. They were elite two-way players. They would immediately improve UW's defense by a few standard deviations, whereas Fultz was very much a contributor to UW being one of the worst defenses in D1 basketball.


Davis and KAT would probably always be the tallest players on the court, that would help them a lot, but then again Fultz got double teamed as soon as he touched the ball on a consistent basis. So Davis and KAT with no spacing on the floor, getting doubled, having to rely on Crisp to get them entry passes. I dunno about KAT, but Davis probably gets UW more wins. doubt they get a tournament birth tho
#failforfultz
User avatar
PhilBlackson
RealGM
Posts: 31,788
And1: 46,534
Joined: May 02, 2017
Location: No Wastemans Land
     

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#744 » by PhilBlackson » Mon Jul 17, 2017 10:31 pm

JojoSlimbiid wrote:Yeah he's definitely not an AD or KAT. He didn't go to Kentucky and not win championships with a bunch of other 5* recruits.


I don't care if they won championships or not, KAT and Davis are superior players to Fultz, there's no shame in admitting that.
>>>THENOTORIOUSBI3<<< :guitar: *INGRAM*ALLSTARSEASON* JaKobe Starter
Image
Names of who OG will be better than Shaedon: DelAbbott, ThaCynic, pingpongrac, Los_29, OakleyDokley
LordCovington33
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,383
And1: 5,223
Joined: Nov 15, 2016
   

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#745 » by LordCovington33 » Mon Jul 17, 2017 10:49 pm

LloydFree wrote:
dkj5061 wrote:
LloydFree wrote:I don't think so. The 76ers will be winning this season whether he plays well or not, so he won't have that much scrutiny. The team winning will save him that aggravation.


Not that I disagree with you about the team taking a big step up in wins, but this feels like you're kinda covering yourself from being wrong/protecting against Fultz being great. For example, if Fultz is playing amazing, are you going to think that his play still has no impact on the (hopefully) team's success?


I'm not covering myself. I hope he does contribute to the teams success in the season. All I've ever said is that Fultz wasn't one of the top 3 players in this draft, and trading up to get a lesser talent was stupid. I've said previously, I think Fultz has a ceiling of CJ McCollum, IMO. CJ McCollum is a very good player. That means I believe Fultz can be a very good player. I just wouldn't have picked Fultz in the top 3. I've been very consistent with that. Fultz could very well contribute to the success of this team and still not be as good as other players in this draft, and still not be worth (2) Top 5 picks. I don't need to cover myself for that.

If Fultz becomes a superstar, you and unbreakable are certainly going to have egg on your faces. Plenty of signature worthy quotes in the above comment alone. :roll:
LordCovington33
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,383
And1: 5,223
Joined: Nov 15, 2016
   

Re: RE: Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#746 » by LordCovington33 » Mon Jul 17, 2017 10:52 pm

Davis and KAT would probably always be the tallest players on the court, that would help them a lot, but then again Fultz got double teamed as soon as he touched the ball on a consistent basis. So Davis and KAT with no spacing on the floor, getting doubled, having to rely on Crisp to get them entry passes. I dunno about KAT, but Davis probably gets UW more wins. doubt they get a tournament birth tho


Embiid, Simmons and Fultz all require double teaming. Beautiful days ahead. I am so excited about the season ahead.
Negrodamus
RealGM
Posts: 26,522
And1: 17,080
Joined: Aug 05, 2004

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#747 » by Negrodamus » Mon Jul 17, 2017 10:59 pm

JojoSlimbiid wrote:
eagereyez wrote:It warms my heart to see the Prokafor **** teammate excuse being re-used. Transformative talent shouldn't be able to beat down on the elite basketball programs of WSU and TCU, got it.


What kind of garbage is this?

I'm still hoping for answer as to what exactly AD and KAT did in college to warrant being labeled transformative outside of not winning a national championship with the most talented rosters in college basketball. I'll wait.

Not even gonna get into the fact that they really haven't done much in the league outside of put up good stats. Wouldn't say N.O or Minny are transformed but I'll save that topic for another day.


If my memory serves me, he swept the SEC award (DPOY, POY, Freshman of the year) and won POY in the NCAA. Oh, yea, he also won a national championship. He also broke the single season freshman block record which is 4th all time regardless of class.
LloydFree
RealGM
Posts: 15,839
And1: 11,656
Joined: Aug 20, 2012
Location: Somewhere near the Jersey Turnpike, between exit 4 and 15E

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#748 » by LloydFree » Mon Jul 17, 2017 11:33 pm

simmbiid wrote:
LloydFree wrote:
dkj5061 wrote:
Not that I disagree with you about the team taking a big step up in wins, but this feels like you're kinda covering yourself from being wrong/protecting against Fultz being great. For example, if Fultz is playing amazing, are you going to think that his play still has no impact on the (hopefully) team's success?


I'm not covering myself. I hope he does contribute to the teams success in the season. All I've ever said is that Fultz wasn't one of the top 3 players in this draft, and trading up to get a lesser talent was stupid. I've said previously, I think Fultz has a ceiling of CJ McCollum, IMO. CJ McCollum is a very good player. That means I believe Fultz can be a very good player. I just wouldn't have picked Fultz in the top 3. I've been very consistent with that. Fultz could very well contribute to the success of this team and still not be as good as other players in this draft, and still not be worth (2) Top 5 picks. I don't need to cover myself for that.

If Fultz becomes a superstar, you and unbreakable are certainly going to have egg on your faces. Plenty of signature worthy quotes in the above comment alone. :roll:

Everybody on this board has a sig-worthy quote related to the past 4 drafts. Exum, Julius Randle, Mudiay and Okafor covers just about every body.
Fischella wrote:I think none of you guys that are pro-Embiid no how basketball works today.. is way easier to win it all with Omer Asik than Olajuwon.
Actually if you ask me which Center I want for my perfect championship caliber team, I will chose Asik hands down
Unbreakable99
General Manager
Posts: 8,752
And1: 3,993
Joined: Jul 04, 2014

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#749 » by Unbreakable99 » Tue Jul 18, 2017 12:06 am

simmbiid wrote:
LloydFree wrote:
dkj5061 wrote:
Not that I disagree with you about the team taking a big step up in wins, but this feels like you're kinda covering yourself from being wrong/protecting against Fultz being great. For example, if Fultz is playing amazing, are you going to think that his play still has no impact on the (hopefully) team's success?


I'm not covering myself. I hope he does contribute to the teams success in the season. All I've ever said is that Fultz wasn't one of the top 3 players in this draft, and trading up to get a lesser talent was stupid. I've said previously, I think Fultz has a ceiling of CJ McCollum, IMO. CJ McCollum is a very good player. That means I believe Fultz can be a very good player. I just wouldn't have picked Fultz in the top 3. I've been very consistent with that. Fultz could very well contribute to the success of this team and still not be as good as other players in this draft, and still not be worth (2) Top 5 picks. I don't need to cover myself for that.

If Fultz becomes a superstar, you and unbreakable are certainly going to have egg on your faces. Plenty of signature worthy quotes in the above comment alone. :roll:


I'd happily accept getting egg on my face if Fultz turns into a superstar. It might not seem like it but I'm pulling for him like hell to be the best player in this class and the NBA. I wish for one day for Laker fans saying damn we should have tried to trade up even harder for Fultz. I want Ainge to say why did I trade the top pick.
User avatar
Arsenal
RealGM
Posts: 17,070
And1: 11,964
Joined: Jun 05, 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
 

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#750 » by Arsenal » Tue Jul 18, 2017 12:09 am

Not sure why the anti-Fultz **** is going on here on the Sixers board. The guy put up huge numbers and shot extremely well in the summer league games he played in before the minor ankle injury. Just the Lonzo hype I guess with Fultz being out of sight out of mind.
LongLiveHinkie
RealGM
Posts: 14,263
And1: 3,963
Joined: May 04, 2005

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#751 » by LongLiveHinkie » Tue Jul 18, 2017 12:25 am

Arsenal wrote:Not sure why the anti-Fultz circlejerk is going on here on the Sixers board. The guy put up huge numbers and shot extremely well in the summer league games he played in before the minor ankle injury. Just the Lonzo hype I guess with Fultz being out of sight out of mind.


It's a vocal minority and contrarians who think they sound intelligent by going against the grain. There's some in every crowd.

It's like if you visit Rome with a group of friends and when you get there it's like "Ok, so we're ready to visit the colosseum and The Vatican, right? And one of your friends is like "Actually[as he takes his glasses off a furrows his brow] I heard there's this really cool golf course around here where Mussolini once hit a hole in one, I think that's that is the much more interest spot to visit." And everyone is like dude STFU, we're going to the colosseum.
LordCovington33
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,383
And1: 5,223
Joined: Nov 15, 2016
   

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#752 » by LordCovington33 » Tue Jul 18, 2017 12:32 am

I'd happily accept getting egg on my face if Fultz turns into a superstar. It might not seem like it but I'm pulling for him like hell to be the best player in this class and the NBA. I wish for one day for Laker fans saying damn we should have tried to trade up even harder for Fultz. I want Ainge to say why did I trade the top pick.


I don't give a toss what their fans think, as long as they don't come here and force feed us their crap.
Ericb5
RealGM
Posts: 10,303
And1: 3,377
Joined: Jan 08, 2014
       

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#753 » by Ericb5 » Tue Jul 18, 2017 1:27 am

Negrodamus wrote:My expectation for Fultz is McCollum. If he doesn't get to that level, as the first overall pick, I'll be disappointed. I think his length, athleticism, and size combo gives him a higher ceiling than McCollum.


McCollum is a fair projection for Fultz in the general sense.

He has more talent than McCollum, and can be better, but he needs to be at least as good as him for the deal to be worth it, and I expect that he will be.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
LloydFree
RealGM
Posts: 15,839
And1: 11,656
Joined: Aug 20, 2012
Location: Somewhere near the Jersey Turnpike, between exit 4 and 15E

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#754 » by LloydFree » Tue Jul 18, 2017 1:48 am

Ericb5 wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:My expectation for Fultz is McCollum. If he doesn't get to that level, as the first overall pick, I'll be disappointed. I think his length, athleticism, and size combo gives him a higher ceiling than McCollum.


McCollum is a fair projection for Fultz in the general sense.

He has more talent than McCollum, and can be better, but he needs to be at least as good as him for the deal to be worth it, and I expect that he will be.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I wouldn't trade 2 top 5 picks for McCollum either.
Fischella wrote:I think none of you guys that are pro-Embiid no how basketball works today.. is way easier to win it all with Omer Asik than Olajuwon.
Actually if you ask me which Center I want for my perfect championship caliber team, I will chose Asik hands down
mithrandir17
Veteran
Posts: 2,907
And1: 1,675
Joined: Jan 30, 2017
 

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#755 » by mithrandir17 » Tue Jul 18, 2017 2:10 am

LloydFree wrote:
Ericb5 wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:My expectation for Fultz is McCollum. If he doesn't get to that level, as the first overall pick, I'll be disappointed. I think his length, athleticism, and size combo gives him a higher ceiling than McCollum.


McCollum is a fair projection for Fultz in the general sense.

He has more talent than McCollum, and can be better, but he needs to be at least as good as him for the deal to be worth it, and I expect that he will be.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I wouldn't trade 2 top 5 picks for McCollum either.

Well, it was a pick swap and probably a late lotto pick in 2019. We did not trade 2 top 5 picks for Fultz.
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 65,909
And1: 26,885
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#756 » by 76ciology » Tue Jul 18, 2017 2:16 am

Ericb5 wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:My expectation for Fultz is McCollum. If he doesn't get to that level, as the first overall pick, I'll be disappointed. I think his length, athleticism, and size combo gives him a higher ceiling than McCollum.


McCollum is a fair projection for Fultz in the general sense.

He has more talent than McCollum, and can be better, but he needs to be at least as good as him for the deal to be worth it, and I expect that he will be.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


More athletic than McCullom, higher upside on defense, better on ISO and better playmaker. Fultz is just a better all around player with higher upside

Only thing they're similar are they are similarly sized perimeter scoring combo guard. Maybe you can also add a younger Eric Gordon? Pushing it further maybe SG version of Kyrie Irving and SG version of Steph Curry?
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
Ericb5
RealGM
Posts: 10,303
And1: 3,377
Joined: Jan 08, 2014
       

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#757 » by Ericb5 » Tue Jul 18, 2017 2:17 am

LloydFree wrote:
Ericb5 wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:My expectation for Fultz is McCollum. If he doesn't get to that level, as the first overall pick, I'll be disappointed. I think his length, athleticism, and size combo gives him a higher ceiling than McCollum.


McCollum is a fair projection for Fultz in the general sense.

He has more talent than McCollum, and can be better, but he needs to be at least as good as him for the deal to be worth it, and I expect that he will be.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I wouldn't trade 2 top 5 picks for McCollum either.


Either would I if that is what we knew we gave up and what we knew we got.

I'm not far away from your opinion on this deal. I liked Ball and Jackson both better than Fultz.

I am hoping we are giving up less than a second top five pick, and I think that Fultz is a stone perfect fit on this team, so I am giving him fit points too.

I think this team mostly goes where Embiid and Simmons take it anyway, so better fit with those guys is more meaningful to our success than talent in a vacuum.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
eagereyez
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,991
And1: 4,462
Joined: May 05, 2012
   

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#758 » by eagereyez » Tue Jul 18, 2017 2:20 am

mithrandir17 wrote:
LloydFree wrote:
Ericb5 wrote:
McCollum is a fair projection for Fultz in the general sense.

He has more talent than McCollum, and can be better, but he needs to be at least as good as him for the deal to be worth it, and I expect that he will be.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I wouldn't trade 2 top 5 picks for McCollum either.

Well, it was a pick swap and probably a late lotto pick in 2019. We did not trade 2 top 5 picks for Fultz.

I hope you're right.
LordCovington33
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,383
And1: 5,223
Joined: Nov 15, 2016
   

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#759 » by LordCovington33 » Tue Jul 18, 2017 2:22 am

LloydFree wrote:
Ericb5 wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:My expectation for Fultz is McCollum. If he doesn't get to that level, as the first overall pick, I'll be disappointed. I think his length, athleticism, and size combo gives him a higher ceiling than McCollum.


McCollum is a fair projection for Fultz in the general sense.

He has more talent than McCollum, and can be better, but he needs to be at least as good as him for the deal to be worth it, and I expect that he will be.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I wouldn't trade 2 top 5 picks for McCollum either.

:meditate:
Lakers are expected to finish 6th last according to vegas, so a top 5 pick is not guaranteed. Plus, we have no idea how Sac will perform a year from now.
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 65,909
And1: 26,885
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#760 » by 76ciology » Tue Jul 18, 2017 2:22 am

^

Image

We are consolidating our assets to mold us into a winning. Josh Jackson and Porter won't lead us futher than what Fultz addition is to our team relative to what we have. They'll just put us on an endless rebuilding cycle.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.

Return to Philadelphia 76ers