Sixerscan wrote:Davis won a national championship...
I could of sworn he was injured for that game. He wasn't, he just had a bad offensive game.
Moderators: BullyKing, HartfordWhalers, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan
Sixerscan wrote:Davis won a national championship...
JojoSlimbiid wrote:eagereyez wrote:It warms my heart to see the Prokafor **** teammate excuse being re-used. Transformative talent shouldn't be able to beat down on the elite basketball programs of WSU and TCU, got it.
What kind of garbage is this?
I'm still hoping for answer as to what exactly AD and KAT did in college to warrant being labeled transformative outside of not winning a national championship with the most talented rosters in college basketball. I'll wait.
Not even gonna get into the fact that they really haven't done much in the league outside of put up good stats. Wouldn't say N.O or Minny are transformed but I'll save that topic for another day.
eagereyez wrote:JojoSlimbiid wrote:eagereyez wrote:It warms my heart to see the Prokafor **** teammate excuse being re-used. Transformative talent shouldn't be able to beat down on the elite basketball programs of WSU and TCU, got it.
What kind of garbage is this?
I'm still hoping for answer as to what exactly AD and KAT did in college to warrant being labeled transformative outside of not winning a national championship with the most talented rosters in college basketball. I'll wait.
Not even gonna get into the fact that they really haven't done much in the league outside of put up good stats. Wouldn't say N.O or Minny are transformed but I'll save that topic for another day.
Davis and KAT played defense. They were elite two-way players. They would immediately improve UW's defense by a few standard deviations, whereas Fultz was very much a contributor to UW being one of the worst defenses in D1 basketball.
JojoSlimbiid wrote:Yeah he's definitely not an AD or KAT. He didn't go to Kentucky and not win championships with a bunch of other 5* recruits.
LloydFree wrote:dkj5061 wrote:LloydFree wrote:I don't think so. The 76ers will be winning this season whether he plays well or not, so he won't have that much scrutiny. The team winning will save him that aggravation.
Not that I disagree with you about the team taking a big step up in wins, but this feels like you're kinda covering yourself from being wrong/protecting against Fultz being great. For example, if Fultz is playing amazing, are you going to think that his play still has no impact on the (hopefully) team's success?
I'm not covering myself. I hope he does contribute to the teams success in the season. All I've ever said is that Fultz wasn't one of the top 3 players in this draft, and trading up to get a lesser talent was stupid. I've said previously, I think Fultz has a ceiling of CJ McCollum, IMO. CJ McCollum is a very good player. That means I believe Fultz can be a very good player. I just wouldn't have picked Fultz in the top 3. I've been very consistent with that. Fultz could very well contribute to the success of this team and still not be as good as other players in this draft, and still not be worth (2) Top 5 picks. I don't need to cover myself for that.
Davis and KAT would probably always be the tallest players on the court, that would help them a lot, but then again Fultz got double teamed as soon as he touched the ball on a consistent basis. So Davis and KAT with no spacing on the floor, getting doubled, having to rely on Crisp to get them entry passes. I dunno about KAT, but Davis probably gets UW more wins. doubt they get a tournament birth tho
JojoSlimbiid wrote:eagereyez wrote:It warms my heart to see the Prokafor **** teammate excuse being re-used. Transformative talent shouldn't be able to beat down on the elite basketball programs of WSU and TCU, got it.
What kind of garbage is this?
I'm still hoping for answer as to what exactly AD and KAT did in college to warrant being labeled transformative outside of not winning a national championship with the most talented rosters in college basketball. I'll wait.
Not even gonna get into the fact that they really haven't done much in the league outside of put up good stats. Wouldn't say N.O or Minny are transformed but I'll save that topic for another day.
simmbiid wrote:LloydFree wrote:dkj5061 wrote:
Not that I disagree with you about the team taking a big step up in wins, but this feels like you're kinda covering yourself from being wrong/protecting against Fultz being great. For example, if Fultz is playing amazing, are you going to think that his play still has no impact on the (hopefully) team's success?
I'm not covering myself. I hope he does contribute to the teams success in the season. All I've ever said is that Fultz wasn't one of the top 3 players in this draft, and trading up to get a lesser talent was stupid. I've said previously, I think Fultz has a ceiling of CJ McCollum, IMO. CJ McCollum is a very good player. That means I believe Fultz can be a very good player. I just wouldn't have picked Fultz in the top 3. I've been very consistent with that. Fultz could very well contribute to the success of this team and still not be as good as other players in this draft, and still not be worth (2) Top 5 picks. I don't need to cover myself for that.
If Fultz becomes a superstar, you and unbreakable are certainly going to have egg on your faces. Plenty of signature worthy quotes in the above comment alone.
Fischella wrote:I think none of you guys that are pro-Embiid no how basketball works today.. is way easier to win it all with Omer Asik than Olajuwon.
Actually if you ask me which Center I want for my perfect championship caliber team, I will chose Asik hands down
simmbiid wrote:LloydFree wrote:dkj5061 wrote:
Not that I disagree with you about the team taking a big step up in wins, but this feels like you're kinda covering yourself from being wrong/protecting against Fultz being great. For example, if Fultz is playing amazing, are you going to think that his play still has no impact on the (hopefully) team's success?
I'm not covering myself. I hope he does contribute to the teams success in the season. All I've ever said is that Fultz wasn't one of the top 3 players in this draft, and trading up to get a lesser talent was stupid. I've said previously, I think Fultz has a ceiling of CJ McCollum, IMO. CJ McCollum is a very good player. That means I believe Fultz can be a very good player. I just wouldn't have picked Fultz in the top 3. I've been very consistent with that. Fultz could very well contribute to the success of this team and still not be as good as other players in this draft, and still not be worth (2) Top 5 picks. I don't need to cover myself for that.
If Fultz becomes a superstar, you and unbreakable are certainly going to have egg on your faces. Plenty of signature worthy quotes in the above comment alone.
Arsenal wrote:Not sure why the anti-Fultz circlejerk is going on here on the Sixers board. The guy put up huge numbers and shot extremely well in the summer league games he played in before the minor ankle injury. Just the Lonzo hype I guess with Fultz being out of sight out of mind.
I'd happily accept getting egg on my face if Fultz turns into a superstar. It might not seem like it but I'm pulling for him like hell to be the best player in this class and the NBA. I wish for one day for Laker fans saying damn we should have tried to trade up even harder for Fultz. I want Ainge to say why did I trade the top pick.
Negrodamus wrote:My expectation for Fultz is McCollum. If he doesn't get to that level, as the first overall pick, I'll be disappointed. I think his length, athleticism, and size combo gives him a higher ceiling than McCollum.
Ericb5 wrote:Negrodamus wrote:My expectation for Fultz is McCollum. If he doesn't get to that level, as the first overall pick, I'll be disappointed. I think his length, athleticism, and size combo gives him a higher ceiling than McCollum.
McCollum is a fair projection for Fultz in the general sense.
He has more talent than McCollum, and can be better, but he needs to be at least as good as him for the deal to be worth it, and I expect that he will be.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fischella wrote:I think none of you guys that are pro-Embiid no how basketball works today.. is way easier to win it all with Omer Asik than Olajuwon.
Actually if you ask me which Center I want for my perfect championship caliber team, I will chose Asik hands down
LloydFree wrote:Ericb5 wrote:Negrodamus wrote:My expectation for Fultz is McCollum. If he doesn't get to that level, as the first overall pick, I'll be disappointed. I think his length, athleticism, and size combo gives him a higher ceiling than McCollum.
McCollum is a fair projection for Fultz in the general sense.
He has more talent than McCollum, and can be better, but he needs to be at least as good as him for the deal to be worth it, and I expect that he will be.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I wouldn't trade 2 top 5 picks for McCollum either.
Ericb5 wrote:Negrodamus wrote:My expectation for Fultz is McCollum. If he doesn't get to that level, as the first overall pick, I'll be disappointed. I think his length, athleticism, and size combo gives him a higher ceiling than McCollum.
McCollum is a fair projection for Fultz in the general sense.
He has more talent than McCollum, and can be better, but he needs to be at least as good as him for the deal to be worth it, and I expect that he will be.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
LloydFree wrote:Ericb5 wrote:Negrodamus wrote:My expectation for Fultz is McCollum. If he doesn't get to that level, as the first overall pick, I'll be disappointed. I think his length, athleticism, and size combo gives him a higher ceiling than McCollum.
McCollum is a fair projection for Fultz in the general sense.
He has more talent than McCollum, and can be better, but he needs to be at least as good as him for the deal to be worth it, and I expect that he will be.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I wouldn't trade 2 top 5 picks for McCollum either.
mithrandir17 wrote:LloydFree wrote:Ericb5 wrote:
McCollum is a fair projection for Fultz in the general sense.
He has more talent than McCollum, and can be better, but he needs to be at least as good as him for the deal to be worth it, and I expect that he will be.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I wouldn't trade 2 top 5 picks for McCollum either.
Well, it was a pick swap and probably a late lotto pick in 2019. We did not trade 2 top 5 picks for Fultz.
LloydFree wrote:Ericb5 wrote:Negrodamus wrote:My expectation for Fultz is McCollum. If he doesn't get to that level, as the first overall pick, I'll be disappointed. I think his length, athleticism, and size combo gives him a higher ceiling than McCollum.
McCollum is a fair projection for Fultz in the general sense.
He has more talent than McCollum, and can be better, but he needs to be at least as good as him for the deal to be worth it, and I expect that he will be.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I wouldn't trade 2 top 5 picks for McCollum either.