agiaco wrote:Who else is feeling sick about our future after all this recent talk? Drafting Vucevic, getting Aminu is so underwhelming.
hoping it's just talk.
Moderators: BullyKing, HartfordWhalers, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan
agiaco wrote:Who else is feeling sick about our future after all this recent talk? Drafting Vucevic, getting Aminu is so underwhelming.
51X3RF4N wrote:I'm feeling sick to think wouldn't trade Iggy after all this posturing. I like the guy as a player, but he doesn't want to be here, he isn't worth his contract, and we've talked about trading him all along.
To not do so now would be a big disappointment to me. Especially when you COULD get an expiring, a young asset (albeit a likely bust), and potentially the #37 pick without giving up more than Speights in addition.
IDK, I just want a change and a rebuild, but I doubt I'll get it.
Skates wrote:It's a simple reality that Philadelphia is not a place where NBA players think about playing.
I am old enough to remember the Dr. J years fondly...and all of the empty seats at playoff games during many of those years.
Philly is viewed by most as a football/hockey town and the Phillies were an intermittent draw before they got the new stadium. It does not have the glitz associated with the New York/Chicago/LA/Miami markets, it doesn't have the tax advantages that places in Florida and Texas do. Most players today don't know much of the city's older basketball tradition and we have notoriously hostile/passionate fans and not the friendliest media around. It is not a nice, sunny sunbelt or west coast city.
Boston has the aura of being the Celtics that will likely last forever. The Sixers' aura is long tarnished. NBA players simply don't view this city as a FA haven, you are absolutely fooling yourself if you think that. Brand came here in a year when few teams had cap space, he needed to cash in and his choices were stay in Clipperland, Philly and GS. Going forward lots more teams are being careful about cap space and have better weather, taxes, bigger media and endoresement possibilities, a winning atmosphere, etc.
The Phillies started their current run by overpaying Thome to come here, in the max salary environment of the NBA the Sixers can't do that unless they want to overpay lesser talent. With the salaries the same wherever you go, the other factors become huge. To a hockey player, Philly is manna from heaven, to an NBA player it is the pits. It's not crap, it is the truth.
The Knicks don't have much of a winning tradition of late, but they have MSG, huge endorsement possibilities and the NY mojo. Miami and Orlando have great weather, no state income tax and in Miami, great night life. Chicago even had a hard time getting FA's interested in going there after the Jordan era, now that they have Rose they can draw guys like Boozer, etc. Look where the big name FA's went or forced trades to, NY and Miami. LA will be rebuilding in a couple of years and so will Boston. Those are NBA FA destinations, Philly most decidedly is not unless we are the only ones with money that year.
Put a 50+ win team on the floor for four or five years and the team becomes gradually more attractive. Add a superstar by trade or draft and others will wnat to join them. Don't do that and at best you get second tier guys like Brand, not the LeBron, Wade, etc class.
I am old enough to remember the Dr. J years fondly...and all of the empty seats at playoff games during many of those years.
agiaco wrote:51X3RF4N wrote:I'm feeling sick to think wouldn't trade Iggy after all this posturing. I like the guy as a player, but he doesn't want to be here, he isn't worth his contract, and we've talked about trading him all along.
To not do so now would be a big disappointment to me. Especially when you COULD get an expiring, a young asset (albeit a likely bust), and potentially the #37 pick without giving up more than Speights in addition.
IDK, I just want a change and a rebuild, but I doubt I'll get it.
I'm just confused as to why people want to make a change for the sake of change even if they admit all that we would get in return is an expiring contract, a likely bust and a worthless pick #37. At least the Ellis deal brings you some talent imo.
agiaco wrote:I'm just confused as to why people want to make a change for the sake of change
ExplosionsInDaSky wrote:I realize Biedrins has a horrible contract but why not take a chance on him? He looked like he was gonna be solid a couple of years ago. Not sure what happened. Dude can't shoot free throws and he has the dumbest damn hairstyle in the NBA but he is a big body than can rebound with force and isn't a bad post defender. On top of that he's still fairly young and a change of scenery might do him good. At the same time we get our scorer in Ellis along with a center...WTF??? Thats getting two needs for Iguodala in one shot plus our 16th pick will be there as well.
Redlight wrote:Andris Biedrins is a HACKSAW.
Westbrook36 wrote:Williams way above the rest.
Ellis 2nd, Kaman 3rd
Odom not in the convo.
SparksFly87 wrote:Towns got boat feet and gets off the ground very slow with a lack of explosiveness . He is a rich mans Henry Sims to me. No thanks .
freshie2 wrote:Assuming all rumors have some merit...would you prefer (as the main piece of a trade):
Ellis
Kaman
D. Williams
Odom
freshie2 wrote:Assuming all rumors have some merit...would you prefer (as the main piece of a trade):
Ellis
Kaman
D. Williams
Odom