76ciology wrote:I dont know why people say Ben-Fox trade makes sense..
Haliburton and Mitchell aren’t good fit for Ben.
Bagley and Ben are redundant.
Pretty sure that they want Ben & Fox
Meanwhile, Bagley can’t even get a game
Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan
76ciology wrote:I dont know why people say Ben-Fox trade makes sense..
Haliburton and Mitchell aren’t good fit for Ben.
Bagley and Ben are redundant.
Tomjas wrote:76ciology wrote:I dont know why people say Ben-Fox trade makes sense..
Haliburton and Mitchell aren’t good fit for Ben.
Bagley and Ben are redundant.
Pretty sure that they want Ben & Fox
Meanwhile, Bagley can’t even get a game
76ciology wrote:Tomjas wrote:76ciology wrote:I dont know why people say Ben-Fox trade makes sense..
Haliburton and Mitchell aren’t good fit for Ben.
Bagley and Ben are redundant.
Pretty sure that they want Ben & Fox
Meanwhile, Bagley can’t even get a game
Ben and Fox aren’t also good fits. If im the Kings, I can’t see how Ben is a better fit than Haliburton to Fox.
Hell… I dont even see how Ben is a better fit than Hield or Barbes to Fox.
76ciology wrote:In my humble opinion, the most likely destination for Ben are the Wolves and Blazers. Only these two teams would kill to get Ben.
The only reason why Kings and Spurs are suddenly in the spotlight is.. fans are getting hyped with Dejounte Murray’s play with Spurs CLEARLY inflating his numbers while the fans also think Fox is a buy low opportunity. Which I believe in reality, our FO wouldnt even consider Murray and Kings FO wouldnt even consider trading Fox for Ben.
BoogieTime wrote:Fox would be a huge gamble, and he has been terrible this year
My position has always been the same, I'd prefer to keep Hali AND Mitchell to Fox.
He's talented but a low motor player who needs inspiring. He doesn't impose any will on games.
As a Kings fan I have equal questions about Simmons game though, especially seeing the Sixers perform without him.
Still, if I'm the Sixers I'd take the sure thing, even if its less talented, in an improved Murray package
76ciology wrote:Here’s something to think about..
We OBVIOUSLY want a top tier scorer like Dame and Harden.
Why?
Because we need a guy who can take over the game when Biid is out or not feeling it. Or just to help Biid to create shots in crunch time.
What if we just get a guy who can do that but in low volume of possessions instead? That would be more realistic to acquire.
Like if u look at Manu Ginobili, he probably wont be that good if he’s playing for the Rockets playing PnR like James Harden. But Manu can be great with his role with the Spurs, playing off the bench and helping TD and the rest of the guys down the stretch.
For instance.. why not just go for a guy like Jordan Clarkson (i know he’s not available) or Anfernee Simons instead?
We’re playing well without a ball dominant PG anyway. Why not build with that? Then down the stretch, opponents wouldnt know how will kill them such as what weve seen in the Bulls game. Kork scoring like Reggie Miller in his prime, Maxey too fast for the defender to chase off an Embiid screen for him to take elbow shots or drive to the basket, Tobi doing his thing whatever that is then we have this guy who can do some high PPP on ISO on low volume.
For example..
cole anthony 1.2ppp
Jordan clarkson 1.2ppp
Anfernee simons 1.17ppp
Dinwiddie 1.09ppp
Jalen Brunson 1.00 ppp
*add picks to make up the difference in value
Wilfried wrote:I really can't see what De'Aaron Fox would bring to the team, that Tyrese Maxey isn't or can't and what would justify the 28 million per year differential in salary.
DCasey91 wrote:76ciology who is Fox guarding?
Both Maxey and Curry for that matter can’t start. We are not championship level on defense and our offense still needs a 2.
Worst case is this:
We are stuck with Harris for the duration
And we are stuck with Fox putting up 23/6 on poor splits in playoffs being a net negative
So essentially two/thirds of our biggest contracts brings in zero return to our team. We are then stuck in same position as before. 2 max contracts who aren’t worth paying top dollar.
I don’t know how people think Fox works with Embiid. He simply doesn’t or I can’t see it.
Murray by definition allows Curry to start. Cheaper contract too and does more for us. Fox by definition forces Maxey and Curry out of the starting team and the bench is finally fine and doesn’t need anymore excess.
Legit Maxey is heading towards Fox anyway on his own trajectory. No overlaps please
Simons on the otherhand is a CJ 2.0 or close to it for us. At minimum he’s a better Milton because he can bomb all day and has no conscious and his trigger is KORKGOD lightning quick.
Dude stroked 8/8 in 15mins last season and the Blazers have given him a raw setting have a look at the pecking order as I mentioned last season when I wanted him for Thybulle (now Milton instead). I reckon 20% of his receives is literally 8 secs left on the shot clock when CJ/Dame soaks it all up then passes to him and says to the kid well we can’t score have a go. Exactly what Tobias does lol
He set a NBA record of 13 made 3’s in a row off the bench.
So it’s like this:
Curry/Simons/Korkmaz as our nuke PG/SG/Wing. Doc finds which one is hotter than the sun and ride them until they cool off. Law of averages will tell you one will go off. All of them can sink 5 made threes in a flash. Instead of “score creating” it’s a missile system Ala Klay getting hot. We’ve seen our irrational of a nuke shooter KORKGOD is and Seth is a consistent Nuke just add one more to the table.
Stretch 3/4 bomba Niang + Gallo for example and that gives us endless threats to stretch the opponents defense way beyond its perimeters.
Heat dominated with a less dominant center. Did you see how much gravity Embiid brought vs the Bulls? he’s never had that much space in his life.
Why? Because you can’t leave any of the 4 others alone or pay the highest consequence.
I’m adamant Murray is a better fit then Fox, and Simons is better for us than Milton.

76ciology wrote:I dont know why people say Ben-Fox trade makes sense..
Haliburton and Mitchell aren’t good fit for Ben.
Bagley and Ben are redundant.