ImageImageImage

Markelle Fultz Discussion

Moderators: BullyKing, HartfordWhalers, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan

Negrodamus
RealGM
Posts: 26,525
And1: 17,080
Joined: Aug 05, 2004

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#941 » by Negrodamus » Sat Aug 5, 2017 2:15 am

cksdayoff wrote:
Read on Twitter


this is from a lakers beat writer, which is funny. only problem i have with those projections are the win totals. sixers are winning 40+ games barring health


If he puts up those numbers, we're in the playoffs.
LloydFree
RealGM
Posts: 15,839
And1: 11,656
Joined: Aug 20, 2012
Location: Somewhere near the Jersey Turnpike, between exit 4 and 15E

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#942 » by LloydFree » Sat Aug 5, 2017 2:30 am

Negrodamus wrote:
cksdayoff wrote:
Read on Twitter


this is from a lakers beat writer, which is funny. only problem i have with those projections are the win totals. sixers are winning 40+ games barring health


If he puts up those numbers, we're in the playoffs.

We'll get to the playoffs whether Fultz gets those numbers or not. A healthy Embiid will drag this team to the playoffs, and if he isn't healthy they wont go, period.

Fultz won't get anywhere near 18 Points per game. He won't get the minutes. Bradley Beal, who is a comparable talent, who started on a young team, scored 13 a game. CJ McCollum didn't score over 18 ppg until he was a 24 year old NBA veteran. I'd expect Fultz to score 13 per game.
Fischella wrote:I think none of you guys that are pro-Embiid no how basketball works today.. is way easier to win it all with Omer Asik than Olajuwon.
Actually if you ask me which Center I want for my perfect championship caliber team, I will chose Asik hands down
Negrodamus
RealGM
Posts: 26,525
And1: 17,080
Joined: Aug 05, 2004

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#943 » by Negrodamus » Sat Aug 5, 2017 2:51 am

LloydFree wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:
cksdayoff wrote:
Read on Twitter


this is from a lakers beat writer, which is funny. only problem i have with those projections are the win totals. sixers are winning 40+ games barring health


If he puts up those numbers, we're in the playoffs.

We'll get to the playoffs whether Fultz gets those numbers or not. A healthy Embiid will drag this team to the playoffs, and if he isn't healthy they wont go, period.

Fultz won't get anywhere near 18 Points per game. He won't get the minutes. Bradley Beal, who is a comparable talent, who started on a young team, scored 13 a game. CJ McCollum didn't score over 18 ppg until he was a 24 year old NBA veteran. I'd expect Fultz to score 13 per game.


So if Embiid gets injured mid season and Fultz + Simmons put up some big numbers (like the numbers mentioned above), there's zero chance they go? It's either Embiid carries them or nothing? Seems a little hyperbolic.
LloydFree
RealGM
Posts: 15,839
And1: 11,656
Joined: Aug 20, 2012
Location: Somewhere near the Jersey Turnpike, between exit 4 and 15E

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#944 » by LloydFree » Sat Aug 5, 2017 3:00 am

Negrodamus wrote:
LloydFree wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:
If he puts up those numbers, we're in the playoffs.

We'll get to the playoffs whether Fultz gets those numbers or not. A healthy Embiid will drag this team to the playoffs, and if he isn't healthy they wont go, period.

Fultz won't get anywhere near 18 Points per game. He won't get the minutes. Bradley Beal, who is a comparable talent, who started on a young team, scored 13 a game. CJ McCollum didn't score over 18 ppg until he was a 24 year old NBA veteran. I'd expect Fultz to score 13 per game.


So if Embiid gets injured mid season and Fultz + Simmons put up some big numbers (like the numbers mentioned above), there's zero chance they go? It's either Embiid carries them or nothing? Seems a little hyperbolic.

It may sound hyperbolic, but that's how I see it. Fultz isn't old enough or good enough to affect the 76ers playoff chances this year. Without Embiid, Simmons isn't enough, and I think Simmons will be great. But Simmons, Redick, Fultz, Covington and Holmes isn't a playoff team. Even in the East.
Fischella wrote:I think none of you guys that are pro-Embiid no how basketball works today.. is way easier to win it all with Omer Asik than Olajuwon.
Actually if you ask me which Center I want for my perfect championship caliber team, I will chose Asik hands down
bedjawII
Pro Prospect
Posts: 775
And1: 160
Joined: Jun 22, 2014
 

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#945 » by bedjawII » Sat Aug 5, 2017 10:53 am

Simmons25 wrote:
eyeatoma wrote:
Unbreakable99 wrote:
Scout 2 said he reminds him of DWade :o


A lot of NBA experts have said that...


Have to say I knew nothing of Fultz... never followed him as I didn't see any Washington games as I thought we had zero chance at the #1 pick... but even I only had to watch 5 minutes of highlights to immediately say he reminded me of Dwayne Wade and that was before hearing any NBA expert say the same thing.

So it surprises me more to see some people say he doesn't remind them of Wade. Not saying he will be as a good a player but the way he moves, shoots, attacks the basket and creates his own shot is like a clone of Wade.


It's not some. It's one. The same guy who claims he has below average handles and athleticism.
LloydFree
RealGM
Posts: 15,839
And1: 11,656
Joined: Aug 20, 2012
Location: Somewhere near the Jersey Turnpike, between exit 4 and 15E

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#946 » by LloydFree » Sat Aug 5, 2017 11:22 am

bedjawII wrote:
Simmons25 wrote:
eyeatoma wrote:
A lot of NBA experts have said that...


Have to say I knew nothing of Fultz... never followed him as I didn't see any Washington games as I thought we had zero chance at the #1 pick... but even I only had to watch 5 minutes of highlights to immediately say he reminded me of Dwayne Wade and that was before hearing any NBA expert say the same thing.

So it surprises me more to see some people say he doesn't remind them of Wade. Not saying he will be as a good a player but the way he moves, shoots, attacks the basket and creates his own shot is like a clone of Wade.


It's not some. It's one. The same guy who claims he has below average handles and athleticism.

I said he has a below average handle for a starting NBA point guard and he's not a great athlete. If you are going to mock, get it right.
Fischella wrote:I think none of you guys that are pro-Embiid no how basketball works today.. is way easier to win it all with Omer Asik than Olajuwon.
Actually if you ask me which Center I want for my perfect championship caliber team, I will chose Asik hands down
Mrcrockpots
Junior
Posts: 460
And1: 172
Joined: Jun 30, 2017
       

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#947 » by Mrcrockpots » Sat Aug 5, 2017 12:09 pm

I'm not saying Fultz will be Wade (he's not as athletic), but the comparisons are legit in one major way. Finishing at the rim. Fultz has that same skill that Wade has in terms of using his handle to get into the paint and having the length/explosion and body control to create and finish at the rim. Fultz is going to make a TON of plays just by getting fed the ball on the perimeter. Not only can he shoot 40% from 3, but he is going to be elite at getting to the paint via pump fake and spin moves.

If Simmons doesn't get Embiid the ball in the pick and roll, then Fultz will just by the shear pressure he'll put on rotating defenses with his shooting and elite moves on offense. It's legit scary how many points Embiid could possibly get in our offense with Simmons being the primary creator and then having an elite secondary guy that can create but also do all the things you need from an elite 2 guard (high efficiency catch and shoot %s, weakside defense, create on all 3 levels, run in transition, finish in transition, run off screens, interrupt passing lanes with his length).

This season needs to freaking start already.
User avatar
Misteclipse
Junior
Posts: 478
And1: 375
Joined: Oct 07, 2009

Re: RE: Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#948 » by Misteclipse » Sat Aug 5, 2017 1:56 pm

LloydFree wrote:
eyeatoma wrote:Great article on Fultz providing analysis from different scouts... Looks like he should be fine... :-)

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2725182-nba-scouts-bullish-on-markelle-fultzs-rookie-year-impact-hes-ready-day-1

Scout #2 is a hack.

And you're a crybaby. Who cares?

Don't do this. Disagree with the post without taking personal shots. - BullyKing

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
Ericb5
RealGM
Posts: 10,303
And1: 3,377
Joined: Jan 08, 2014
       

Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#949 » by Ericb5 » Sat Aug 5, 2017 2:33 pm

Negrodamus wrote:
LloydFree wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:
If he puts up those numbers, we're in the playoffs.

We'll get to the playoffs whether Fultz gets those numbers or not. A healthy Embiid will drag this team to the playoffs, and if he isn't healthy they wont go, period.

Fultz won't get anywhere near 18 Points per game. He won't get the minutes. Bradley Beal, who is a comparable talent, who started on a young team, scored 13 a game. CJ McCollum didn't score over 18 ppg until he was a 24 year old NBA veteran. I'd expect Fultz to score 13 per game.


So if Embiid gets injured mid season and Fultz + Simmons put up some big numbers (like the numbers mentioned above), there's zero chance they go? It's either Embiid carries them or nothing? Seems a little hyperbolic.


Embiid is the only player that can get us to the playoffs. Simmons and Fultz are going to be great rookies, but healthy Embiid is an all NBA player.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Unbreakable99
General Manager
Posts: 8,752
And1: 3,993
Joined: Jul 04, 2014

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#950 » by Unbreakable99 » Sat Aug 5, 2017 6:53 pm

Simmons25 wrote:
eyeatoma wrote:
Unbreakable99 wrote:
Scout 2 said he reminds him of DWade :o


A lot of NBA experts have said that...


Have to say I knew nothing of Fultz... never followed him as I didn't see any Washington games as I thought we had zero chance at the #1 pick... but even I only had to watch 5 minutes of highlights to immediately say he reminded me of Dwayne Wade and that was before hearing any NBA expert say the same thing.

So it surprises me more to see some people say he doesn't remind them of Wade. Not saying he will be as a good a player but the way he moves, shoots, attacks the basket and creates his own shot is like a clone of Wade.


I don't think Fultz and Wade play similar games. Wade is a better athlete and get to his spots better than Fultz can. Wade has never been a guy to shoot 3s. His game is about 20ft on in. Fultz has more range than Wade. Fultz should be a better 3 point shooter and take many more 3s than Wade ever took. Wade also lived at the foul line. Will Fultz? I'm not so sure. He's still an average NBA athlete. In Summer League Fultz didn't get close to the rim attacking. He had to settle for floaters and 5-8 foot shots unlike when Wade can get to the rim much better. Wade and Fultz are nothing alike in terms of the way they play. The only thing Fultz does that Wade does is make acrobatic shots. Fultz has shown the ability to take and make some tough shots. But will it translate to the NBA where players are longer and faster? We'll see.
Negrodamus
RealGM
Posts: 26,525
And1: 17,080
Joined: Aug 05, 2004

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#951 » by Negrodamus » Sat Aug 5, 2017 7:59 pm

LloydFree wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:
LloydFree wrote:We'll get to the playoffs whether Fultz gets those numbers or not. A healthy Embiid will drag this team to the playoffs, and if he isn't healthy they wont go, period.

Fultz won't get anywhere near 18 Points per game. He won't get the minutes. Bradley Beal, who is a comparable talent, who started on a young team, scored 13 a game. CJ McCollum didn't score over 18 ppg until he was a 24 year old NBA veteran. I'd expect Fultz to score 13 per game.


So if Embiid gets injured mid season and Fultz + Simmons put up some big numbers (like the numbers mentioned above), there's zero chance they go? It's either Embiid carries them or nothing? Seems a little hyperbolic.

It may sound hyperbolic, but that's how I see it. Fultz isn't old enough or good enough to affect the 76ers playoff chances this year. Without Embiid, Simmons isn't enough, and I think Simmons will be great. But Simmons, Redick, Fultz, Covington and Holmes isn't a playoff team. Even in the East.


Hopefully we won't have to worry about this. I do think it would be troublesome if a team based around Fultz, Simmons, Covington, Reddick, Holmes, with Saric, McConnell, Stauskas, Amir Johnson coming off the bench couldn't make a serious run at making the playoffs. That's 2 number one picks surrounded by veterans and a pretty decent bench in an absolutely horrible East.

Fultz and/Simmons would probably have to bust hard for that to happen.
mattd13
Senior
Posts: 597
And1: 119
Joined: Dec 15, 2014
       

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#952 » by mattd13 » Sat Aug 5, 2017 8:10 pm

I think with the style of play they will use he should score. he must be committed to run a lot then he can benefit from a running team. with his length he should be able to finish well. off coarse it all depends on embiid staying on the court. I see ben starting a lot of breaks with jj and fultz getting the benefit.
LloydFree
RealGM
Posts: 15,839
And1: 11,656
Joined: Aug 20, 2012
Location: Somewhere near the Jersey Turnpike, between exit 4 and 15E

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#953 » by LloydFree » Sat Aug 5, 2017 9:44 pm

Negrodamus wrote:
LloydFree wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:
So if Embiid gets injured mid season and Fultz + Simmons put up some big numbers (like the numbers mentioned above), there's zero chance they go? It's either Embiid carries them or nothing? Seems a little hyperbolic.

It may sound hyperbolic, but that's how I see it. Fultz isn't old enough or good enough to affect the 76ers playoff chances this year. Without Embiid, Simmons isn't enough, and I think Simmons will be great. But Simmons, Redick, Fultz, Covington and Holmes isn't a playoff team. Even in the East.


Hopefully we won't have to worry about this. I do think it would be troublesome if a team based around Fultz, Simmons, Covington, Reddick, Holmes, with Saric, McConnell, Stauskas, Amir Johnson coming off the bench couldn't make a serious run at making the playoffs. That's 2 number one picks surrounded by veterans and a pretty decent bench in an absolutely horrible East.

Fultz and/Simmons would probably have to bust hard for that to happen.

I don't think they have to bust hard at all to miss the playoffs. They're both Rookies. The Wizards with a veteran John Wall and rookie Bradley Beal were one of the worst teams in the NBA. The Simmons and Fultz duo would be near that combo. The rest of the team... you have to have way more confidence in their ability than they deserve, to call that a playoff roster. Covington and Redick are legitimate NBA starters. The rest of them are average NBA bench players that many other teams have. The thing that makes this team a playoff contender is Embiid. It was proven last year with his on/off numbers. You're giving too much credit to the rest of the roster.

Take Embiid off the team, we're no better than the 2012/13 Wizards, who went 29-53. Wall, Beal, Ariza vs Simmons, Fultz, Covington
Fischella wrote:I think none of you guys that are pro-Embiid no how basketball works today.. is way easier to win it all with Omer Asik than Olajuwon.
Actually if you ask me which Center I want for my perfect championship caliber team, I will chose Asik hands down
Chris76
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,969
And1: 318
Joined: May 06, 2017
   

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#954 » by Chris76 » Sat Aug 5, 2017 10:00 pm

LloydFree wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:
LloydFree wrote:It may sound hyperbolic, but that's how I see it. Fultz isn't old enough or good enough to affect the 76ers playoff chances this year. Without Embiid, Simmons isn't enough, and I think Simmons will be great. But Simmons, Redick, Fultz, Covington and Holmes isn't a playoff team. Even in the East.


Hopefully we won't have to worry about this. I do think it would be troublesome if a team based around Fultz, Simmons, Covington, Reddick, Holmes, with Saric, McConnell, Stauskas, Amir Johnson coming off the bench couldn't make a serious run at making the playoffs. That's 2 number one picks surrounded by veterans and a pretty decent bench in an absolutely horrible East.

Fultz and/Simmons would probably have to bust hard for that to happen.

I don't think they have to bust hard at all to miss the playoffs. They're both Rookies. The Wizards with a veteran John Wall and rookie Bradley Beal we're one of the worst teams in the NBA. The Simmons and Fultz would be near that combo. The rest of the team... you have to have way more confidence in their ability than they deserve, to call that a playoff roster. Covington and Redick are legitimate NBA starters. The rest of them are the average NBA bench players that many other teams have. The thing that makes this team a playoff contender is Embiid. It was proven last year with his on/off numbers. You're giving too much credit to the rest of the roster.

Take Embiid off the team, we're no better than the 2012/13 Wizards, who went 29-53. Wall, Beal, Ariza vs Simmons, Fultz, Covington


Fultz
Redick
Covington
Simmons
Okafor

This team wins more than 29 games, last year we won 28 games. Anyway, add Embiid and your talking playoffs.
Negrodamus
RealGM
Posts: 26,525
And1: 17,080
Joined: Aug 05, 2004

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#955 » by Negrodamus » Sun Aug 6, 2017 12:22 am

LloydFree wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:
LloydFree wrote:It may sound hyperbolic, but that's how I see it. Fultz isn't old enough or good enough to affect the 76ers playoff chances this year. Without Embiid, Simmons isn't enough, and I think Simmons will be great. But Simmons, Redick, Fultz, Covington and Holmes isn't a playoff team. Even in the East.


Hopefully we won't have to worry about this. I do think it would be troublesome if a team based around Fultz, Simmons, Covington, Reddick, Holmes, with Saric, McConnell, Stauskas, Amir Johnson coming off the bench couldn't make a serious run at making the playoffs. That's 2 number one picks surrounded by veterans and a pretty decent bench in an absolutely horrible East.

Fultz and/Simmons would probably have to bust hard for that to happen.

I don't think they have to bust hard at all to miss the playoffs. They're both Rookies. The Wizards with a veteran John Wall and rookie Bradley Beal were one of the worst teams in the NBA. The Simmons and Fultz duo would be near that combo. The rest of the team... you have to have way more confidence in their ability than they deserve, to call that a playoff roster. Covington and Redick are legitimate NBA starters. The rest of them are average NBA bench players that many other teams have. The thing that makes this team a playoff contender is Embiid. It was proven last year with his on/off numbers. You're giving too much credit to the rest of the roster.

Take Embiid off the team, we're no better than the 2012/13 Wizards, who went 29-53. Wall, Beal, Ariza vs Simmons, Fultz, Covington


I don't think I have more confidence than they deserve. I think you're overrating the EC playoffs.
Negrodamus
RealGM
Posts: 26,525
And1: 17,080
Joined: Aug 05, 2004

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#956 » by Negrodamus » Sun Aug 6, 2017 12:23 am

Chris76 wrote:
LloydFree wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:
Hopefully we won't have to worry about this. I do think it would be troublesome if a team based around Fultz, Simmons, Covington, Reddick, Holmes, with Saric, McConnell, Stauskas, Amir Johnson coming off the bench couldn't make a serious run at making the playoffs. That's 2 number one picks surrounded by veterans and a pretty decent bench in an absolutely horrible East.

Fultz and/Simmons would probably have to bust hard for that to happen.

I don't think they have to bust hard at all to miss the playoffs. They're both Rookies. The Wizards with a veteran John Wall and rookie Bradley Beal we're one of the worst teams in the NBA. The Simmons and Fultz would be near that combo. The rest of the team... you have to have way more confidence in their ability than they deserve, to call that a playoff roster. Covington and Redick are legitimate NBA starters. The rest of them are the average NBA bench players that many other teams have. The thing that makes this team a playoff contender is Embiid. It was proven last year with his on/off numbers. You're giving too much credit to the rest of the roster.

Take Embiid off the team, we're no better than the 2012/13 Wizards, who went 29-53. Wall, Beal, Ariza vs Simmons, Fultz, Covington


Fultz
Redick
Covington
Simmons
Okafor

This team wins more than 29 games, last year we won 28 games. Anyway, add Embiid and your talking playoffs.


I think Lloyd and I can both agree that Okafor would not be the one worthy of that final starting spot. That's for sure.
User avatar
Mik317
RealGM
Posts: 41,285
And1: 19,916
Joined: May 31, 2005
Location: In Spain...without the S
       

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#957 » by Mik317 » Sun Aug 6, 2017 12:28 am

the hatred some seem to have for Fultz is amazing. **** are secretly hoping for one of their own players to bust all so they can go I told you so...sad.
#NeverGonnaBeGood
Mrcrockpots
Junior
Posts: 460
And1: 172
Joined: Jun 30, 2017
       

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#958 » by Mrcrockpots » Sun Aug 6, 2017 12:40 am

That's how I feel as well. I just hope the majority of Sixers fans let these guys go through their growing pains. A bad year from Fultz doesn't mean he's a bust. Although I'm sure some on this board will be falling over chairs to tell you they were right.
Chris76
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,969
And1: 318
Joined: May 06, 2017
   

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#959 » by Chris76 » Sun Aug 6, 2017 1:39 am

Negrodamus wrote:
Chris76 wrote:
LloydFree wrote:I don't think they have to bust hard at all to miss the playoffs. They're both Rookies. The Wizards with a veteran John Wall and rookie Bradley Beal we're one of the worst teams in the NBA. The Simmons and Fultz would be near that combo. The rest of the team... you have to have way more confidence in their ability than they deserve, to call that a playoff roster. Covington and Redick are legitimate NBA starters. The rest of them are the average NBA bench players that many other teams have. The thing that makes this team a playoff contender is Embiid. It was proven last year with his on/off numbers. You're giving too much credit to the rest of the roster.

Take Embiid off the team, we're no better than the 2012/13 Wizards, who went 29-53. Wall, Beal, Ariza vs Simmons, Fultz, Covington


Fultz
Redick
Covington
Simmons
Okafor

This team wins more than 29 games, last year we won 28 games. Anyway, add Embiid and your talking playoffs.


I think Lloyd and I can both agree that Okafor would not be the one worthy of that final starting spot. That's for sure.


Simmons is a great rebounder and passer, he would set Okafor up for layups. Okafor would average 20 pts or more finishing Simmons' assists. Okafor is a very good scoring big. Holmes is a very good player, but he is not a starting center. Anyway, Okafor with the starters is still a very good team, maybe 40 wins.

Fultz............Sergio
Redick..........Stauskus
Covington......Covington
Simmons........Saric
Okafor...........Holmes

The guard upgrade gets you 10 to 15 more wins than last year.
LloydFree
RealGM
Posts: 15,839
And1: 11,656
Joined: Aug 20, 2012
Location: Somewhere near the Jersey Turnpike, between exit 4 and 15E

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion 

Post#960 » by LloydFree » Sun Aug 6, 2017 2:04 am

Negrodamus wrote:
LloydFree wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:
Hopefully we won't have to worry about this. I do think it would be troublesome if a team based around Fultz, Simmons, Covington, Reddick, Holmes, with Saric, McConnell, Stauskas, Amir Johnson coming off the bench couldn't make a serious run at making the playoffs. That's 2 number one picks surrounded by veterans and a pretty decent bench in an absolutely horrible East.

Fultz and/Simmons would probably have to bust hard for that to happen.

I don't think they have to bust hard at all to miss the playoffs. They're both Rookies. The Wizards with a veteran John Wall and rookie Bradley Beal were one of the worst teams in the NBA. The Simmons and Fultz duo would be near that combo. The rest of the team... you have to have way more confidence in their ability than they deserve, to call that a playoff roster. Covington and Redick are legitimate NBA starters. The rest of them are average NBA bench players that many other teams have. The thing that makes this team a playoff contender is Embiid. It was proven last year with his on/off numbers. You're giving too much credit to the rest of the roster.

Take Embiid off the team, we're no better than the 2012/13 Wizards, who went 29-53. Wall, Beal, Ariza vs Simmons, Fultz, Covington


I don't think I have more confidence than they deserve. I think you're overrating the EC playoffs.

Could be. I think there are 7 teams in the East that would be significantly better than an Embiid-less 76er team. But looking over Detoit's bleh, unbalanced, roster and the Knicks with no current NBA level PG, maybe they could figure out a way to win enough to get the 8th seed.
Fischella wrote:I think none of you guys that are pro-Embiid no how basketball works today.. is way easier to win it all with Omer Asik than Olajuwon.
Actually if you ask me which Center I want for my perfect championship caliber team, I will chose Asik hands down

Return to Philadelphia 76ers