RealGM

The following choices have been made by other fan forums...

1 BOS Markelle Fultz
2 LAL Lonzo Ball
3 PHI
4 PHO
5 SAC
6 ORL
7 MIN
8 NYK
9 DAL
10 SAC
11 CHA
12 DET
13 DEN
14 MIA

Gotta go with Jackson, but Tatum and Isaac are def in the mix.

I predict it will go something like(without any trades)

1. Boston Markelle Fultz
2. Lakers Lonzo Ball
3. Sixers Josh Jackson
4. Suns Jayson Tatum
5. Sacramento De'Aaron Fox
6. Orlando Dennis Smith Jr.
7. Minnesota Jonathan Isaac
8. New York Frank Ntilinka
9. Dallas Malik Monk
10. Sacramento Justin Jackson(based on need)

Philly should take an extremely long look at Malik Monk

sixers238 wrote:Gotta go with Jackson, but Tatum and Isaac are def in the mix.

Ditto. Jackson is the leader but there are arguments for Isaac and Tatum.

Fans around the league are kind of shook about us landing Josh Jackson, I've noticed.

Embiid/Simmons/Jackson

Each one of those guys is a potential championship Big 3 piece. All three of them together is a daunting sight.

Kobblehead wrote:Fans around the league are kind of shook about us landing Josh Jackson, I've noticed.

Embiid/Simmons/Jackson

Each one of those guys is a potential championship Big 3 piece. All three of them together is a daunting sight.

Anything worth going to read?

Kobblehead wrote:Fans around the league are kind of shook about us landing Josh Jackson, I've noticed.

Embiid/Simmons/Jackson

Each one of those guys is a potential championship Big 3 piece. All three of them together is a daunting sight.

Most of the people who run mock drafts don't see that because I mainly see Tatum or Fox or Monk at 3. I know whatever they say means nothing in the grand scheme of things but it's surprising to me that I don't see more of them saying Jackson will come to Philly.

DoItALL9 wrote:Philly should take an extremely long look at Malik Monk

Not with a top ten pick they shouldn't.

I've noticed there are a lot of other fan bases who think the Sixers aren't taking Jackson because of the lack of shooting between he and Ben.

MR28 wrote:Anything worth going to read?

I have no posts/threads specifically noted. Just comments I've read in passing. There's a contingency on each the Celtics, Lakers and Suns boards that acknowledge Jackson as the best player in this draft and are annoyed about us potentially having Embiid, Simmons and him together, going forward.

That's what free agency and trades are for.

the_process wrote:

DoItALL9 wrote:Philly should take an extremely long look at Malik Monk

Not with a top ten pick they shouldn't.

So you don't think he's worthy a top ten pick? So who's your preference?

Kobblehead wrote:

MR28 wrote:Anything worth going to read?

I have no posts/threads specifically noted. Just comments I've read in passing. There's a contingency on each the Celtics, Lakers and Suns boards that acknowledge Jackson as the best player in this draft and are annoyed about us potentially having Embiid, Simmons and him together, going forward.

Can you link it so I can read it?

DoItALL9 wrote:

the_process wrote:

DoItALL9 wrote:Philly should take an extremely long look at Malik Monk

Not with a top ten pick they shouldn't.

So you don't think he's worthy a top ten pick? So who's your preference?

At 3 if they keep that pick? Josh Jackson.

the_process wrote:

DoItALL9 wrote:

the_process wrote:
Not with a top ten pick they shouldn't.

So you don't think he's worthy a top ten pick? So who's your preference?

At 3 if they keep that pick? Josh Jackson.

You don't think Monk should be a top ten pick?

DoItALL9 wrote:

the_process wrote:

DoItALL9 wrote:So you don't think he's worthy a top ten pick? So who's your preference?

At 3 if they keep that pick? Josh Jackson.

You don't think Monk should be a top ten pick?

No, I don't. A one dimensional shooter is not a top 10 pick IMO. Aim higher.

the_process wrote:

DoItALL9 wrote:

the_process wrote:
At 3 if they keep that pick? Josh Jackson.

You don't think Monk should be a top ten pick?

No, I don't. A one dimensional shooter is not a top 10 pick IMO. Aim higher.

Devin Booker had a similar scouting report from many a couple years ago.

DoItALL9 wrote:

the_process wrote:

DoItALL9 wrote:You don't think Monk should be a top ten pick?

No, I don't. A one dimensional shooter is not a top 10 pick IMO. Aim higher.

Devin Booker had a similar scouting report from many a couple years ago.

And he might be the most overrated player in the league.

DoItALL9 wrote:

the_process wrote:

DoItALL9 wrote:You don't think Monk should be a top ten pick?

No, I don't. A one dimensional shooter is not a top 10 pick IMO. Aim higher.

Devin Booker had a similar scouting report from many a couple years ago.

If Monk was 6'6" I think he'd be a bit higher regarded.