kriss73 wrote:Am I the only one thinking that we lack a guard/forward capable to be lockdown 1vs1 defender?
I don't think so. I feel like many on here have belabored this point, myself included, over the past few weeks.
Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Sixerscan, Foshan, sixers hoops
kriss73 wrote:Am I the only one thinking that we lack a guard/forward capable to be lockdown 1vs1 defender?
Oh fine I didn't read the whole topic. It was mostly a rethoric question.Negrodamus wrote:kriss73 wrote:Am I the only one thinking that we lack a guard/forward capable to be lockdown 1vs1 defender?
I don't think so. I feel like many on here have belabored this point, myself included, over the past few weeks.
Adam Silver wrote:"Gross incompetence is acceptable; strategic gaming of a flawed system is not."
LakersDynasty14 wrote:Lonzo Ball is literally on a Hall of Fame trajectory at this point. This thread is so full of fail.
shakes0 wrote:I hope they put Simmons on Trae. He'll foul him out by the 3rd quarter. plus Simmons can't stay in front of Trae. No one can.
PLO wrote:The Stepien's Sixers board is worth a read.
the_process wrote:PLO wrote:The Stepien's Sixers board is worth a read.
The Stepien has Doncic too high and Jackson too low.
LakersDynasty14 wrote:Lonzo Ball is literally on a Hall of Fame trajectory at this point. This thread is so full of fail.
shakes0 wrote:I hope they put Simmons on Trae. He'll foul him out by the 3rd quarter. plus Simmons can't stay in front of Trae. No one can.
Mik317 wrote:1 on 1 defenders are a bit...overrated. To truly defend folks, its a team effort. What we need is guys capable of at the very least staying in front of folks and contesting shots. We have a lot of t-rexes that get major minutes that hurts at times. JJ and Marco try their best but they are often traffic cones at the end of the day. As much as he perplexes me, this is what makes Roco great. He has the length to bother shots and can switch on to multiple guys. Simmons has this ability as well. ideally we replace Dario or JJ with another guy with a similar skillset to have less times some poor sap is in the blender against a HOF.
but these are also the type of sacrifices you often have to make when it comes to shooters. Klay is special for that reason lol. Having it both ways is the holy grail of sorts
PLO wrote:the_process wrote:PLO wrote:The Stepien's Sixers board is worth a read.
The Stepien has Doncic too high and Jackson too low.
It is a Sixers board so understandable to have the best wing at the top of our board.
the_process wrote:PLO wrote:the_process wrote:
The Stepien has Doncic too high and Jackson too low.
It is a Sixers board so understandable to have the best wing at the top of our board.
Yes, and Doncic is a Euro; which means BC would trade Embiid plus all the picks to get him.
LakersDynasty14 wrote:Lonzo Ball is literally on a Hall of Fame trajectory at this point. This thread is so full of fail.
shakes0 wrote:I hope they put Simmons on Trae. He'll foul him out by the 3rd quarter. plus Simmons can't stay in front of Trae. No one can.
PLO wrote:the_process wrote:PLO wrote:
It is a Sixers board so understandable to have the best wing at the top of our board.
Yes, and Doncic is a Euro; which means BC would trade Embiid plus all the picks to get him.
Perhaps a tad over-dramatic there pal, lol.
I can tell you one thing, you have a Doncic playing for us in game two we have another genuine playmaker on the floor, and a guy who can hit tough shots in big moments. That's the type of player that wins us that game against the Heat. I also think he'll actually be a better defender in his first few years in the league compared to a Mikal Bridges because at this stage he's a lot stronger physically than the older Mikal. Although its true Mikal's defensive upside is a lot higher.
We have one percent chance of getting him though, so its a bit of a pipedream.
Negrodamus wrote:Mik317 wrote:1 on 1 defenders are a bit...overrated. To truly defend folks, its a team effort. What we need is guys capable of at the very least staying in front of folks and contesting shots. We have a lot of t-rexes that get major minutes that hurts at times. JJ and Marco try their best but they are often traffic cones at the end of the day. As much as he perplexes me, this is what makes Roco great. He has the length to bother shots and can switch on to multiple guys. Simmons has this ability as well. ideally we replace Dario or JJ with another guy with a similar skillset to have less times some poor sap is in the blender against a HOF.
but these are also the type of sacrifices you often have to make when it comes to shooters. Klay is special for that reason lol. Having it both ways is the holy grail of sorts
I agree, but I do think 1v1 eventually comes into the fold. If we look at our current situation, teams are using Belinelli to exploit. We pretty much switch everything and are left with his piss poor 1v1 defense against a star. Having a player with length and strength to switch and at least bother the (pardon recency bias) Wades, LeBrons, etc while being able to hit from the outside is going to be important for us moving forward.
LakersDynasty14 wrote:Lonzo Ball is literally on a Hall of Fame trajectory at this point. This thread is so full of fail.
shakes0 wrote:I hope they put Simmons on Trae. He'll foul him out by the 3rd quarter. plus Simmons can't stay in front of Trae. No one can.
the_process wrote:PLO wrote:the_process wrote:
Yes, and Doncic is a Euro; which means BC would trade Embiid plus all the picks to get him.
Perhaps a tad over-dramatic there pal, lol.
I can tell you one thing, you have a Doncic playing for us in game two we have another genuine playmaker on the floor, and a guy who can hit tough shots in big moments. That's the type of player that wins us that game against the Heat. I also think he'll actually be a better defender in his first few years in the league compared to a Mikal Bridges because at this stage he's a lot stronger physically than the older Mikal. Although its true Mikal's defensive upside is a lot higher.
We have one percent chance of getting him though, so its a bit of a pipedream.
Yes. I thought that was obvious enough as to not bother with the green font. And yes, the Sixers probably aren’t going to be in his range.
But as to Doncic, I don’t see any of what you’re talking about as a player. I wouldn’t take him in the top 5.
LakersDynasty14 wrote:Lonzo Ball is literally on a Hall of Fame trajectory at this point. This thread is so full of fail.
shakes0 wrote:I hope they put Simmons on Trae. He'll foul him out by the 3rd quarter. plus Simmons can't stay in front of Trae. No one can.
PLO wrote:Negrodamus wrote:Mik317 wrote:1 on 1 defenders are a bit...overrated. To truly defend folks, its a team effort. What we need is guys capable of at the very least staying in front of folks and contesting shots. We have a lot of t-rexes that get major minutes that hurts at times. JJ and Marco try their best but they are often traffic cones at the end of the day. As much as he perplexes me, this is what makes Roco great. He has the length to bother shots and can switch on to multiple guys. Simmons has this ability as well. ideally we replace Dario or JJ with another guy with a similar skillset to have less times some poor sap is in the blender against a HOF.
but these are also the type of sacrifices you often have to make when it comes to shooters. Klay is special for that reason lol. Having it both ways is the holy grail of sorts
I agree, but I do think 1v1 eventually comes into the fold. If we look at our current situation, teams are using Belinelli to exploit. We pretty much switch everything and are left with his piss poor 1v1 defense against a star. Having a player with length and strength to switch and at least bother the (pardon recency bias) Wades, LeBrons, etc while being able to hit from the outside is going to be important for us moving forward.
Wade shredded us but we didn't really have an attacker who could do the same to him on the other end. Despite his steal of Saric at the end of the game, 36 year old Wade is a very bad defender - we just didn't have the personnel who could attack him on the other end outside of Simmons, and Wade was shielded from him by their defensive setups.
the_process wrote:PLO wrote:the_process wrote:
Yes, and Doncic is a Euro; which means BC would trade Embiid plus all the picks to get him.
Perhaps a tad over-dramatic there pal, lol.
I can tell you one thing, you have a Doncic playing for us in game two we have another genuine playmaker on the floor, and a guy who can hit tough shots in big moments. That's the type of player that wins us that game against the Heat. I also think he'll actually be a better defender in his first few years in the league compared to a Mikal Bridges because at this stage he's a lot stronger physically than the older Mikal. Although its true Mikal's defensive upside is a lot higher.
We have one percent chance of getting him though, so its a bit of a pipedream.
Yes. I thought that was obvious enough as to not bother with the green font. And yes, the Sixers probably aren’t going to be in his range.
But as to Doncic, I don’t see any of what you’re talking about as a player. I wouldn’t take him in the top 5.
Fischella wrote:I think none of you guys that are pro-Embiid no how basketball works today.. is way easier to win it all with Omer Asik than Olajuwon.
Actually if you ask me which Center I want for my perfect championship caliber team, I will chose Asik hands down
PLO wrote:the_process wrote:PLO wrote:
Perhaps a tad over-dramatic there pal, lol.
I can tell you one thing, you have a Doncic playing for us in game two we have another genuine playmaker on the floor, and a guy who can hit tough shots in big moments. That's the type of player that wins us that game against the Heat. I also think he'll actually be a better defender in his first few years in the league compared to a Mikal Bridges because at this stage he's a lot stronger physically than the older Mikal. Although its true Mikal's defensive upside is a lot higher.
We have one percent chance of getting him though, so its a bit of a pipedream.
Yes. I thought that was obvious enough as to not bother with the green font. And yes, the Sixers probably aren’t going to be in his range.
But as to Doncic, I don’t see any of what you’re talking about as a player. I wouldn’t take him in the top 5.
I have Doncic one by a decent margin, but its all moot anyway given we have a slim to none chance at him.
ivysixer2000 wrote:PLO wrote:the_process wrote:
Yes. I thought that was obvious enough as to not bother with the green font. And yes, the Sixers probably aren’t going to be in his range.
But as to Doncic, I don’t see any of what you’re talking about as a player. I wouldn’t take him in the top 5.
I have Doncic one by a decent margin, but its all moot anyway given we have a slim to none chance at him.
Never know, we could end up at 6, with the ability to move up a couple of spots if Doncic falls a bit. All this arguing over picks yet they both will probably end up around 10, kinda funny actually.
I still see this being a wing heavy draft after the big men that are going at the top, which is good for us. There will be someone who makes a difference on the wing later in this draft, just a matter of if we are the ones that pick him or not. I would be disappointed if we don't come away with at least 3 wings in this draft.
LakersDynasty14 wrote:Lonzo Ball is literally on a Hall of Fame trajectory at this point. This thread is so full of fail.
shakes0 wrote:I hope they put Simmons on Trae. He'll foul him out by the 3rd quarter. plus Simmons can't stay in front of Trae. No one can.
LakersDynasty14 wrote:Lonzo Ball is literally on a Hall of Fame trajectory at this point. This thread is so full of fail.
shakes0 wrote:I hope they put Simmons on Trae. He'll foul him out by the 3rd quarter. plus Simmons can't stay in front of Trae. No one can.
Negrodamus wrote:Speaking of CJ McCollum (in another thread), I'm beginning to feel a bit like Allonzo Trier is the next McCollum. Probably the most efficient scorer in the country with identical length, height, etc as McCollum. He also played for a much better conference than Lehigh. He also looks a bit more athletic. I'd consider strongly taking him with our second pick.