ImageImageImage

Game 39: Celtics @ Sixers - 7pm

Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Sixerscan, Foshan, sixers hoops

Kobblehead
RealGM
Posts: 39,993
And1: 19,080
Joined: Apr 15, 2010
 

Re: Game 39: Celtics @ Sixers - 7pm 

Post#161 » by Kobblehead » Fri Jan 10, 2020 5:10 am

XtremeDunkz wrote:Pelle is cool, but I am curious what KOQ did to land in the dog house. I never thought he played bad. Especially compared to the trash tier backup bigs we trotted out last year.

Hot take, I'd rather bring back Greg Monroe to play over Pelle and O'Quinn.
76thBearCub
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,586
And1: 2,713
Joined: Dec 06, 2011
     

Re: Game 39: Celtics @ Sixers - 7pm 

Post#162 » by 76thBearCub » Fri Jan 10, 2020 5:40 am

The term sleeping giants applies to this team in a multitude of ways.

Sent from my LML212VL using RealGM mobile app
brannigan73
Rookie
Posts: 1,054
And1: 600
Joined: Apr 28, 2011

Re: Game 39: Celtics @ Sixers - 7pm 

Post#163 » by brannigan73 » Fri Jan 10, 2020 6:09 am

The way Horford and Richardson played tonight was really encouraging. Richardson is a really good player when he constantly attacks and looks for his shot and doesnt hesitate. Al is just much more comfortable playing center. I know they are missing Embiid but if they could win one out of these next two road games then they come home and play 3 games and then have the Knicks on the road.
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 61,183
And1: 23,416
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: Game 39: Celtics @ Sixers - 7pm 

Post#164 » by 76ciology » Fri Jan 10, 2020 7:01 am

P.S. great call by Brett to put Pelle, instead of KOQ, against Kanter. The Josh Rich-Burke backcourt was also a heck of a curve ball.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
phillynative
General Manager
Posts: 8,771
And1: 2,713
Joined: Dec 13, 2014

Re: Game 39: Celtics @ Sixers - 7pm 

Post#165 » by phillynative » Fri Jan 10, 2020 8:23 am

Kobblehead wrote:
XtremeDunkz wrote:Pelle is cool, but I am curious what KOQ did to land in the dog house. I never thought he played bad. Especially compared to the trash tier backup bigs we trotted out last year.

Hot take, I'd rather bring back Greg Monroe to play over Pelle and O'Quinn.


Why?
the_process
RealGM
Posts: 26,384
And1: 8,703
Joined: May 01, 2010

Re: Game 39: Celtics @ Sixers - 7pm 

Post#166 » by the_process » Fri Jan 10, 2020 9:37 am

HotelVitale wrote:
ProcessDoctor wrote:
HotelVitale wrote:Fun game, and good to see folks here are enjoying it this time. Although there are more posts trashing the Celts instead of praising us--why so hard to just take hats off to our talented starters showing off what they do? Harris was Harris, Horford Horford, Simmons Simmons, Richardson the good version of himself. Gotta talented team.
Bro it’s Philly. Look back at the thread, at least a third of the comments are complaints.


Eh, doesn't feel like Philly this year. Feels like people who don't want to commit to a girlfriend because they're scared she might break their heart. We're probably not going to win a title but the point is that we're good enough to beat anyone when we're on, and that gives us a chance. Not sure what else people want out of a sports team.


Almost right. It's like messing with the neighbor girl who you know is a slut. If you commit, it's certain to break your heart so you keep it light and are even kind of mean about it.

That being said, with all these national media stories coming out now about how the Sixers aren't good enough, they need to make a move and they need a closer, wouldn't Ben Simmons look great on his own team, what about Simmons to GSW, OMZG WHAT ARE THEY GOING TO DO WITHOUT JO, if they play well without Jo it's bad and if they play bad without Jo it's bad... I can't take it. I'm now back the other way. I still think they should aim to upgrade Scott and Ennis. But not at any cost higher than the OKC "1st". If that means no deals, then no deals. Let's just ride this one out and see where they are in the summer.
Ferry Avenue
Starter
Posts: 2,139
And1: 825
Joined: May 08, 2019
     

Re: Game 39: Celtics @ Sixers - 7pm 

Post#167 » by Ferry Avenue » Fri Jan 10, 2020 10:00 am

youngcrev wrote:Fun game. Good to some guys actually moving around on offense rather than the stagnant, guys taking turns posting up.

That was indeed the difference I saw. Perhaps when the human ball and chain known as Joel Embiid is out, the team moves better.
ExplosionsInDaSky
RealGM
Posts: 20,047
And1: 4,460
Joined: Mar 17, 2004

Re: Game 39: Celtics @ Sixers - 7pm 

Post#168 » by ExplosionsInDaSky » Fri Jan 10, 2020 12:57 pm

I retract any trade Horford statement I made this past week. He was a completely different player last night. He looked like his former all star self, he played with confidence and charisma, and he played to win the game. The signing still doesn't make any sense because Horford IS a center through and through, but i'm so glad we have him right now with Embiid being out. Hell of an insurance policy for Embiid. I just hope he can keep it going when Embiid does come back.
Overall, I thought we played outstanding! We're a different team defensively when Thybulle is in the game. I thought Brett handled the rotations very well last night too. Not once did I have a complaint about how guys were used. Great win!
Kobblehead
RealGM
Posts: 39,993
And1: 19,080
Joined: Apr 15, 2010
 

Re: Game 39: Celtics @ Sixers - 7pm 

Post#169 » by Kobblehead » Fri Jan 10, 2020 1:12 pm

phillynative wrote:
Kobblehead wrote:
XtremeDunkz wrote:Pelle is cool, but I am curious what KOQ did to land in the dog house. I never thought he played bad. Especially compared to the trash tier backup bigs we trotted out last year.

Hot take, I'd rather bring back Greg Monroe to play over Pelle and O'Quinn.


Why?

I thought he gave us quality minutes at the end of last year and in the playoffs. With Joel likely to miss an extended period, I'd like a proven, productive big like him as an option on gamedays as opposed to a skinny shotblock specialist. O'Quinn apparently isn't even an option because Brett doesn't like him.
Kova
Veteran
Posts: 2,516
And1: 710
Joined: Jan 02, 2009
Location: Croatia
     

Re: Game 39: Celtics @ Sixers - 7pm 

Post#170 » by Kova » Fri Jan 10, 2020 1:29 pm

One of the, if not THE most impressive win we had this season. Yes, even more impressive than the Bucks game.

It had an L written all over it. No Embiid, mid of crisis, soul searching and we were already 2-0 in the matchups against Boston.

When we were down 15, I thought they would embarrass us in front of the home fans. I thought we are getting blown out. But somehow we managed to pull back, stop the bleeding, bring more energy, more focus, became assertive and just broke them down to pieces.

I have to give huge credit to the team and coaches for this one. You can rarely turn around a game against a stable team like Boston and turn -15, to a +9 win. That is huge! I'm very pleasantly surprised.
Sixerscan
Senior Mod - 76ers
Senior Mod - 76ers
Posts: 33,670
And1: 16,042
Joined: Jan 25, 2005

Re: Game 39: Celtics @ Sixers - 7pm 

Post#171 » by Sixerscan » Fri Jan 10, 2020 1:41 pm

Sixerscan wrote:
mithrandir17 wrote:Pelle is only on a two way contract right? Anyone knows when will his 45 day stint with the sixers expire? With embiid out, he might be valuable on some match ups like this one.


Assuming Basketball-Reference's page is right he has 13 DNPs (as opposed to inactive) plus 9 games played so he still has 23 days.


Nah, he only has a few days left apparently according to Pompey:

Pelle had six points on 3-for-3 shooting to go with four rebounds and two blocks in 12 minutes, 38 seconds. He has only five days left toward the maximum number of days (45) an NBA team is allowed to bring up a player on a two-way contract.
Ferry Avenue
Starter
Posts: 2,139
And1: 825
Joined: May 08, 2019
     

Re: Game 39: Celtics @ Sixers - 7pm 

Post#172 » by Ferry Avenue » Fri Jan 10, 2020 1:44 pm

ExplosionsInDaSky wrote:I retract any trade Horford statement I made this past week. He was a completely different player last night. He looked like his former all star self, he played with confidence and charisma, and he played to win the game. The signing still doesn't make any sense because Horford IS a center through and through, but i'm so glad we have him right now with Embiid being out. Hell of an insurance policy for Embiid. I just hope he can keep it going when Embiid does come back.
Overall, I thought we played outstanding! We're a different team defensively when Thybulle is in the game. I thought Brett handled the rotations very well last night too. Not once did I have a complaint about how guys were used. Great win!

Going forward I would keep Scott coming off the bench like usual, and use a starting lineup of Simmons, Thybulle, Richardson, Harris, and Horford. Put Harris back at the 4 where he belongs and insert Thybulle instead of Scott.
mithrandir17
Veteran
Posts: 2,860
And1: 1,609
Joined: Jan 30, 2017
 

Re: Game 39: Celtics @ Sixers - 7pm 

Post#173 » by mithrandir17 » Fri Jan 10, 2020 1:46 pm

Sixerscan wrote:
Sixerscan wrote:
mithrandir17 wrote:Pelle is only on a two way contract right? Anyone knows when will his 45 day stint with the sixers expire? With embiid out, he might be valuable on some match ups like this one.


Assuming Basketball-Reference's page is right he has 13 DNPs (as opposed to inactive) plus 9 games played so he still has 23 days.


Nah, he only has a few days left apparently according to Pompey:

Pelle had six points on 3-for-3 shooting to go with four rebounds and two blocks in 12 minutes, 38 seconds. He has only five days left toward the maximum number of days (45) an NBA team is allowed to bring up a player on a two-way contract.

Yeah, I think the days in between games or practice days still count towards the 45 days. So I guess O'Quinn will be the backup C after five days. Maybe that's why O'Quinn is just quiet because he knows the guy that is playing in front of him will be gone in a few days.
Ferry Avenue
Starter
Posts: 2,139
And1: 825
Joined: May 08, 2019
     

Re: Game 39: Celtics @ Sixers - 7pm 

Post#174 » by Ferry Avenue » Fri Jan 10, 2020 1:47 pm

Kova wrote:One of the, if not THE most impressive win we had this season. Yes, even more impressive than the Bucks game.

It had an L written all over it. No Embiid, mid of crisis, soul searching and we were already 2-0 in the matchups against Boston.

When we were down 15, I thought they would embarrass us in front of the home fans. I thought we are getting blown out. But somehow we managed to pull back, stop the bleeding, bring more energy, more focus, became assertive and just broke them down to pieces.

I have to give huge credit to the team and coaches for this one. You can rarely turn around a game against a stable team like Boston and turn -15, to a +9 win. That is huge! I'm very pleasantly surprised.

Indeed very interesting how the team showed that kind of resolve without Embiid. I think you have to start wondering if he isn't a physical and emotional ball and chain on the team. He often plays sluggishly and often appears that way emotionally as well, and when your team runs through a player like that, it's difficult for it not to affect the whole team's intensity.
Wilfried
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,165
And1: 1,899
Joined: May 24, 2007

Re: Game 39: Celtics @ Sixers - 7pm 

Post#175 » by Wilfried » Fri Jan 10, 2020 1:48 pm

Ferry Avenue wrote:
ExplosionsInDaSky wrote:I retract any trade Horford statement I made this past week. He was a completely different player last night. He looked like his former all star self, he played with confidence and charisma, and he played to win the game. The signing still doesn't make any sense because Horford IS a center through and through, but i'm so glad we have him right now with Embiid being out. Hell of an insurance policy for Embiid. I just hope he can keep it going when Embiid does come back.
Overall, I thought we played outstanding! We're a different team defensively when Thybulle is in the game. I thought Brett handled the rotations very well last night too. Not once did I have a complaint about how guys were used. Great win!

Going forward I would keep Scott coming of the bench like usual, and use a starting lineup of Simmons, Thybulle, Richardson, Harris, and Horford. Put Harris back at the 4 where he belongs and insert Thybulle instead of Scott.


Except Harris is much better at the 3

Pelle gives us something we actually lack and that's athleticism.
I hoped Zhaire Smith could give us a boost there too but that's not the case up till now. But we need some young, athletic legs to run and jump. Pelle, Zhaire and Matysse are probably the only one capable
Ferry Avenue
Starter
Posts: 2,139
And1: 825
Joined: May 08, 2019
     

Re: Game 39: Celtics @ Sixers - 7pm 

Post#176 » by Ferry Avenue » Fri Jan 10, 2020 1:49 pm

Wilfried wrote:
Ferry Avenue wrote:
ExplosionsInDaSky wrote:I retract any trade Horford statement I made this past week. He was a completely different player last night. He looked like his former all star self, he played with confidence and charisma, and he played to win the game. The signing still doesn't make any sense because Horford IS a center through and through, but i'm so glad we have him right now with Embiid being out. Hell of an insurance policy for Embiid. I just hope he can keep it going when Embiid does come back.
Overall, I thought we played outstanding! We're a different team defensively when Thybulle is in the game. I thought Brett handled the rotations very well last night too. Not once did I have a complaint about how guys were used. Great win!

Going forward I would keep Scott coming of the bench like usual, and use a starting lineup of Simmons, Thybulle, Richardson, Harris, and Horford. Put Harris back at the 4 where he belongs and insert Thybulle instead of Scott.


Except Harris is much better at the 3

Pelle gives us something we actually lack and that's athleticism.
I hoped Zhaire Smith could give us a boost there too but that's not the case up till now. But we need some young, athletic legs to run and jump. Pelle, Zhaire and Matysse are probably the only one capable

What makes you say Harris is better at the 3?

I definitely like Pelle as a backup 5.
Wilfried
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,165
And1: 1,899
Joined: May 24, 2007

Re: Game 39: Celtics @ Sixers - 7pm 

Post#177 » by Wilfried » Fri Jan 10, 2020 1:54 pm

Ferry Avenue wrote:
Wilfried wrote:
Ferry Avenue wrote:Going forward I would keep Scott coming of the bench like usual, and use a starting lineup of Simmons, Thybulle, Richardson, Harris, and Horford. Put Harris back at the 4 where he belongs and insert Thybulle instead of Scott.


Except Harris is much better at the 3

Pelle gives us something we actually lack and that's athleticism.
I hoped Zhaire Smith could give us a boost there too but that's not the case up till now. But we need some young, athletic legs to run and jump. Pelle, Zhaire and Matysse are probably the only one capable

What makes you say Harris is better at the 3?

I definitely like Pelle as a backup 5.


The advanced stats from this season (as a 3) compared to those of last season (when he was our 4). Especially on D

Pelle is a nice high energy guy to have, we really need someone like that at the guard too (Matysse tries his best)
Eyeamok
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,506
And1: 3,419
Joined: Mar 02, 2006

Re: Game 39: Celtics @ Sixers - 7pm 

Post#178 » by Eyeamok » Fri Jan 10, 2020 3:21 pm

Great win last night. Now really impress me. Go into Dallas and win there. Ben take it personally that you are not going to make the all star team. Defend the hell out of Luka, hit some two point shots and cap it off with a 3 pointer. Have people talking about you instead of Luka....well at least for that game.
The Accession of Paul Reed is upon us !

You want it to be one way....but it's the other way.

Marlo
youngcrev
RealGM
Posts: 27,448
And1: 8,446
Joined: Jun 12, 2005
Location: Philadelphia(ish)
   

Re: Game 39: Celtics @ Sixers - 7pm 

Post#179 » by youngcrev » Fri Jan 10, 2020 3:34 pm

Wilfried wrote:
Ferry Avenue wrote:
Wilfried wrote:
Except Harris is much better at the 3

Pelle gives us something we actually lack and that's athleticism.
I hoped Zhaire Smith could give us a boost there too but that's not the case up till now. But we need some young, athletic legs to run and jump. Pelle, Zhaire and Matysse are probably the only one capable

What makes you say Harris is better at the 3?

I definitely like Pelle as a backup 5.


The advanced stats from this season (as a 3) compared to those of last season (when he was our 4). Especially on D

Pelle is a nice high energy guy to have, we really need someone like that at the guard too (Matysse tries his best)


He's still playing more minutes at the 4 than the 3 this year. And his production is a lot better at the 4 spot.

http://www.82games.com/1920/19PHI11.HTM#bypos

I think he's just playing better defense in general this year, don't think it has to do with which spot he's in. Just way more effort on that end.
Sixerscan
Senior Mod - 76ers
Senior Mod - 76ers
Posts: 33,670
And1: 16,042
Joined: Jan 25, 2005

Re: Game 39: Celtics @ Sixers - 7pm 

Post#180 » by Sixerscan » Fri Jan 10, 2020 3:47 pm

Sort of a weird game defensively from a box score stand point. Did a pretty bad job limiting their 3s, let them take 36, and they made a lot of them. But the defense inside the arc and not fouling was so good that it balanced it out.

Return to Philadelphia 76ers